E-Assessment An Awarding Body Perspective
Download
Report
Transcript E-Assessment An Awarding Body Perspective
Professor Daniel Khan OBE
Chief Executive
OCN London
“Assessment is a central feature of teaching and the
curriculum. It powerfully frames how students learn and
what students achieve. It is one of the most significant
influences on students’ experience of higher education
and all that they gain from it.
The reason for an explicit focus on improving assessment
practice is the huge impact it has on the quality of
learning.”
Boud & Associates (2010) Assessment 2020: Seven
propositions for assessment reform in higher education
“Information is at the heart of quality assurance.
Assessment management systems can, if used
effectively, give a full overview of assessment
and enable information to flow through an
institution to improve consistency and fairness.”
Peter Findlay, Assistant Director,
Quality Assurance Agency
Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback refers to
practices that provide some, or all, of the following
benefits:
Greater variety and authenticity in the design of
assessments
Improved learner engagement, for example, through
interactive formative assessments with adaptive
feedback
Choice in the timing and location of assessments
Capture of wider skills and attributes not easily
assessed by other means, eg through simulations,
e-portfolios and interactive games
Efficient submission, marking, moderation and
data storage processes
Consistent, accurate results with opportunities to
combine human and computer marking
Immediate feedback
Increased opportunities for learners to act on
feedback, e.g. by reflection in e-portfolios
Innovative approaches based a round use of
creative media and online peer and self
assessment
Accurate, timely and accessible evidence on the
effectiveness of curriculum design and delivery
Pachler et al. A project report for JISC (2009)
Colleges and Training Providers’ requirements
Efficiency of operations
Cost reduction
Student demand
Flexibility of Assessment Models
Investment costs
Credibility and integrity of qualifications
Culture change for staff
Challenge for vocational skills
Global working
International skills benchmarking
Poverty reduction for developing countries through
internationally recognised skills
Income diversification
Flexibility of delivery in workplace
Whether, and how, to measure student
participation in on-line discussion and activities
How to measure individual performances within
group assignments
Authentication of student work
Preventing and detecting plagiarism
Issues of security
Connecting the assessment to the teaching and
learning intent and strategies
The Australian National Training Authority.
Kendle et al (2000) have proposed 10 criteria to
guide the design and development of effective
qualitative e-assessment tasks:
Assessment tasks should be open-ended
Tasks should have a clear purpose and outcome
Tasks should be authentic in nature
There should be an emphasis on process over
product
Collaboration and communication should
incorporated in tasks
Students should have varying degrees of choice in
the assessment tasks
Tasks should be linked to unit or course objectives
Feedback mechanisms should be included in the
task design
Tasks should encourage the appropriate
discriminatory use of online resources
Tasks should enable students to examine and
present many viewpoints
Engages students with the assessment criteria
Supports personalised learning
Ensures feedback leads to improvement
Focuses on student development
Stimulates dialogue
Considers staff and student effort
“Nothing that we do to, or for, our students is more
important than our assessment of their work and the
feedback we give them on it. The results of our
assessment influence our students for the rest of
their lives and careers – fine if we get it right, but
unthinkable if we get it wrong.”
Race, Brown & Smith (2005) 500 Tips on
Assessment