Transcript Document

Lewiston Porter PEC StandardsBased
Report Card
Grades K-3
Report Card Committee Members: Heidi
Kazulak, Suzanne Hedemann, Lisa Winslow,
Kelly Millville, Rebecca Orsi, Alice Destino, Darcy
Allender, Tina Rodriguez, Josh Suita, Michelle
Riehler
History of the Committee’s Work
A 10 member committee made up of grade
levels K-3 teachers and a special area teacher
convened in 2013 approximately 80 hours to:
• Study the research
• Collect & review documents from other
districts
• Identify the PRIORITY standards in each
academic area
• Prepare for implementation year scheduled
for 2013-2014
WHY THE CHANGE?
 To respond to the Common Core State Standards




and instructional shifts
To more accurately and effectively communicate
student progress to parents, students and to staff in
other grades
To be clear and specific about the academic and
pro-social standards of public education: what all
students need to know, shared responsibility of
education, student driven learning
To reduce paperwork and move to three reporting
cycles during the school year so young children
have time to master each standard
To implement meaningful formative assessments
and probes to align with student outcomes and
learning expectations
What is a Standards-Based
Report Card?
 Assesses student performance against a specific and
observable set of skills;
 Measures each student against the identified grade
level; “end of year” standard
 Does not measure how the student performs
compared to the other students.
 Allows teachers to identify standards “not yet
attempted” based on instructional pace.
How were the Academic Standards Selected?
Essential Standards representing what
ALL students should know and be able
to do were identified using the Common
Core State Standards and
Developmental Continuums:
In each academic area
At a specific grade level
Comparison: English Language
Arts & Literacy - Reading
NEW
OLD
 Asks and answers questions using
 Uses comprehension strategies

 Spells correctly in daily work
 Listens for information and
understands
 Stays on topic during class
discussions



evidence from text
Knows and applies grade level
phonics and word analysis skills in
decoding words
Effectively participates in
discussions within a group
Presents information with
appropriate facts and relevant
descriptive details
Student sustains attention and
perseveres throughout tasks
Literacy - Writing
OLD
NEW
 Organizes ideas with
 Produces writing in which the
beginning, middle, end
 Writes in complete sentences
using details
 Stays on topic
development and organization
are appropriate for the task.
 Writes to communicate ideas
and information effectively.
 Uses note taking when
gathering information from
print/digital resources.
 Student sustains attention
and perseveres throughout
tasks
Mathematical Content
OLD
New
 Recognizes place value
 Uses problem solving strategies  Uses place value understanding
to solve operations
 Understands and uses math
 Applies strategies to solve
vocabulary and symbols
problems
 Uses and communicates
mathematical thinking clearly
 Student sustains attention and
perseveres throughout tasks
New Grading Key: A Numeric System
Key for Performance Levels
4
Exemplary
Student consistently and independently demonstrates an advanced understanding and ability to apply grade
level concepts, skills and processes.
3
Proficient
Student consistently and independently demonstrates an understanding and ability to apply concepts, skills
and processes.
2
Developing
Student is not yet consistent in demonstrating an understanding and ability to apply concepts, skills, and
processes. Review, reinforcement and support may be needed.
1
Emerging
Student demonstrates a limited understanding and ability to apply grade level concepts, skills and processes.
Student is performing significantly below grade level expectations.
NA
Not assessed
Not assessed to date.
What Other Changes Will I See?
We recommended three reporting periods with
report card distribution following a timeline of:
•Early December (with conference)
•Mid March (conference optional or by request)
•End of School
Q: Why a Standards-Based Report
Card?
A: Standards-based report cards
provide:
1. In-depth student assessments
2. Consistent evaluations
throughout the year
3. Individualized instruction
information
4. Consistent evaluations between
students
Q: How does this help parents?
A: Standards-based report cards
1. Enable parents to receive accurate information
based on cumulative student progress throughout
the marking period.
2. They promote more detailed and meaningful
conversations at parent/teacher conferences.
3. Allow for careful and precise monitoring of
student achievement.
4. Reflect grade-level standards and expectations
so parents gain a complete idea of student
progress.
Q: Why are all standards not listed on
the report card?
A: A standards-based report card is
not the same as a standard/learning
outcome listing.
Teams of teachers and administrators
reviewed the New York State Common
Core and District standards for each
grade level and chose descriptors which
were considered most significant for
student learning at each grade level.
Q: Why are there no letter grades?
A: A standards-based report card’s rubric approach (4,
3, 2, 1) provides information about student
achievement without the need for letter grades.
Letter grades:
1. Follow a teacher's individual assessments and
expectations.
2. Do not show a student’s performance toward state
and district expectations.
Q: Can a student perform at a level 3 and then move to a lower
level in the next marking period?
A: The expectations change from one marking period to the next as
students move toward the end of grade-level expectations. This
means:
A student may meet the grade-level expectation during the first
marking period, but as the expectations increase, the student may
not demonstrate the same level of proficiency during the next
marking period .
2. A student might receive a 3 in the first marking period and then
receive a 2 in the second marking period.