AB 86: Adult Education Summit Data Presentation http

download report

Transcript AB 86: Adult Education Summit Data Presentation http

AB 86: Adult Education
Legislative Hearings
Week of 3-23-15
http://ab86.cccco.edu
Webinar 3-27-15
Agenda
• Reminder: Grant Extensions
• Field Survey
• Overview of Legislative Hearings
2
Grant Extensions
• If you plan to spend your AB86 planning funds by
June 30, 2015 – you do not need to file for an
extension.
• If you have carryover /leftover funds after June 30,
2015 – you have the option of filing to extend the
end date of your grant to 12/31/15.
• There are no additional funds connected to the
extensions.
• The goal is to help cover the gap that may develop
between planning & implementation.
• Listen to last week’s recorded webinar or join us next
week, April 3rd for another webinar on the extension.
3
Extension Process
• Filing instructions on the AB86 website – under Certification
of Eligibility section. Click on the extension instructions.
• Request a pre-populated face sheet from Karen Baker
[email protected] by March 27th.
• Submit the completed Work Plan Excel Spreadsheet by April
17, 2015 via ab86 inbox – [email protected]
• Separately submit signed face sheets (original signatures
only) and if necessary a signed budget summary – 4 copies /
blue ink. Due by April 17, 2015. Mail to Karen Baker (mailing
address is in the instructions).
• For those who have requested face sheets already, Karen
Baker will be sending updated sheets to you today.
4
Extensions
• New Face Sheets will be sent out
• Return by April 17th
• See 3-20-15 webinar – http://ab86.cccco.edu
– Allowables
– Reporting
– Processes and Paperwork
5
Implementation Survey
• The AB86 cabinet and office is in the process of
developing implementation guidelines and tools.
• The information gathered from this survey will
help determine the priority needs of the regional
consortia in order to best provide technical
assistance and guidance.
• The survey link has been sent to all regional
primary contacts and a copy of the survey has
been sent to all contacts.
• Please work as a consortium to discuss the survey
and develop answers jointly.
6
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on
Education and Finance
Assemblymember Kevin McCarty, Chair
9:00am – State Capitol, Room 444
http://www.calchannel.com/recent-archive/
http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.ph
p?view_id=7&clip_id=2670
7
Governor’s Proposal Panelists
•
•
•
•
Keith Nezaam, Department of Finance
Natasha Collins, Legislative Analyst’s Office
Monique Ramos, Department of Education
Dan Troy, California Community Colleges
Chancellor’s Office
8
Local Perspectives
• Bob Harper, Director, Campbell Adult and
Community Education, Campbell Union High
School District
• Donna Burns, Dean of Continuing Education,
Mt. San Antonio College
9
Background – Department of Finance
• History
– Decrease in Enrollments
– Bifurcation
– Lack of stable funding
• 2013 Budget Act Reform Changes
– Categorical eliminated – MOE – 2015
– Narrowed to 5 program areas
– $25 million planning grants
– SB 173 recommendations
10
Governor’s 2015-16 Budget
•
•
•
•
•
•
$500 million in funding
Creates regional boards
Maintains existing funding for 2015-16 (MOE)
Requires annual plans
Requires annual report
Eliminates adults in correctional facilities program
11
Legislative Analyst Office (LAO)
Recommendations
• Integrate other AE funding
• Require CDE & CCCCO to provide annual
statewide allocation plan to Legislature
• Guidance for Allocation Board – Advisory
• Shift funding from past to current need
• Maintain annual expenditure and outcome
reports; reduce frequency of regional reports
• Require CDE, CCCCO, & CWIB to align
assessment, metrics and improve data sharing
12
Legislative Concerns
• Proposed governance structure may create
bureaucracy and not accountability.
• Creating local fiscal agent may not be efficient.
• Governor’s proposal silent on assessment,
accountability, and fees.
• Annual planning adds uncertainty.
• State Board oversight is unusual.
• Eliminating AE services in correctional facilities
is problematic.
13
Staff Questions for Panelists
• How do we protect and improve successful
programs?
• How do we improve coordination between
K-12 and CC providers to ensure students
transition?
• How do we ensure state funds are directed to
need and to effective programs?
14
Other Questions for Discussion
• What changes does the administration consider making
to the Governor’s proposal?
• Why place non-Prop 98 stakeholders on regional
decision making body?
• Is there a better model to distribute funding?
• Should there be more direction to consortia to ensure
accountability?
• How should governance be set up to ensure fair
representation?
• Can CDE and CCCCO determine MOE sooner than
August?
15
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review
Subcommittee No. 1
Senator Marty Block, Chair
9:30am – State Capitol, Room 3191
http://sbud.senate.ca.gov/sites/sbud.senate.ca.
gov/files/SUB1/03262015Sub1AdultEd.pdf
http://www.calchannel.com/recent-archive/
16
Governor’s Proposal Panelists
•
•
•
•
Keith Nezaam, Department of Finance
Natasha Collins, Legislative Analyst’s Office
Monique Ramos, Department of Education
Dan Troy, California Community Colleges
Chancellor’s Office
17
Background
• Funding Structures
• Enrollments
• Report
• Consortia Plans
18
Governor’s Budget Proposal
• Consortia Plans will be updated and include:
– An evaluation of the adult education needs.
– An evaluation of the current adult education services.
– An evaluation of the funds available for adult education,
including from fund sources than the adult education block
grant.
– Actions that can be taken to address adult education needs.
– Actions that can be taken to improve the delivery of services.
– Actions that can be taken to better transition adult education
recipients into postsecondary education and/or the workforce.
– A description of alignment of adult education services with
other plans from all providers, including those pursuant to the
federal WIOA.
19
Governor’s Budget Proposal (cont.)
• Governance structure
– School Districts
– Community College Districts
– County Offices of Education
• Joint approval of allocation funds
• 2015-16 $ allocated first to K-12 MOE
• 2016-17 $ allocated to consortia
20
Subcommittee Questions
• How far does $500 million go in meeting adult education program
needs? Are there factors the Legislature should consider when
determining the ongoing funding level for this program?
• Are the Department of Finance and the Department of Education
able to determine the amount of adult education funds that were
provided to the five AB 86 adult education areas by school districts
under the MOE for purposes of allocation in 2015-16?
• The Adults in Correctional Facilities categorical program is
proposed to be rolled into the adult education block grant. Funds
for this program were not part of the adult education MOE in place
for the past two years. Do these programs receive the same
funding protections in 2015-16 as other adult education programs
under the Governor’s proposal?
21
Questions (continued)
• What actions can be taken based on the AB 86 Cabinet
report? What actions should be prioritized and what
support or guidance is needed from the state to move
forward on these actions?
• What are the characteristics of the most successful
regional consortia? Can these be replicated across the
state?
• How consistent are the federal data and accountability
requirements under WIOA with the data and
accountability measures that the AB 86 Cabinet
consider necessary for a state adult education system?
22
CTE Panel
• Jim Aschwanden, Executive director, Cal AG
Teachers Association
• Randy Paige, Director ROP and CTE, Sutter
County and President of CAROCP
• Mollie Smith, Director of Occupational and
Noncredit Programs, Palomar College
23
Contact Information
• Debra Jones, Ed.D. [email protected]
• Adult Education Regional Planning
http://ab86.cccco.edu/