Transcript Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports & Response-to-Intervention George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Aug 16 2011 www.pbis.org www.scalingup.org www.cber.org.

Positive Behavioral
Interventions & Supports &
Response-to-Intervention
George Sugai
OSEP Center on PBIS
Center for Behavioral Education & Research
University of Connecticut
Aug 16 2011
www.pbis.org
www.scalingup.org
www.cber.org
Emphasis on
punishment
Poor
implementation
fidelity
Nonconstructive
Reactive
1980s
SW
Discipline
Problem
Limited
effects
“Big Ideas” from Early Years
Teach & recognize behavior directly, school-wide
• Colvin & Sugai (1992)
Focus adult behavior in team-based SW action planning
• Colvin, Kame’enui, & Sugai (1993)
Consider ALL as foundation for some by establishing local
behavioral expertise
• Sugai & Horner (1994)
Integrate evidence-based practices in multi-tiered
prevention logic
• Walker, Horner, Sugai, Bullis, Sprague, Bricker, & Kaufman (1996)
Prevention Logic for All
Biglan, 1995; Mayer, 1995; Walker et al., 1996
Decrease
development
of new
problem
behaviors
Prevent
worsening &
reduce
intensity of
existing
problem
behaviors
Eliminate
Teach,
triggers &
monitor, &
maintainers of acknowledge
problem
prosocial
behaviors
behavior
Redesign of teaching environments…not students
“Early
Triangle”
(p. 201)
Walker, Knitzer,
Reid, et al., CDC
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
FEW
~5%
~15%
SOME
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
ALL
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
PBS
1980s
Positive
Behavior
Support
ABA
1968
Applied
Behavior
Analysis
PBIS
1997
Positive Behavioral
Interventions &
Supports
SWPBS
SCHOOL-WIDE
POSITIVE
BEHAVIOR
SUPPORTS
Converging
Influences
1990s
Implementation
Science
RtI
1990s
ResponsetoIntervention
9
SWPBS (aka PBIS/RtI) is
Framework for enhancing
adoption & implementation of
Continuum of evidencebased interventions to
achieve
Academically & behaviorally
important outcomes for
All students
Integrated
Elements
Supporting Social Competence &
Academic Achievement
OUTCOMES
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
PRACTICES
Supporting
Student Behavior
Intensive
Targeted
Universal
Few
Some
All
Dec 7, 2007
Continuum of
Support for
ALL
Math
Intensive
Science
Continuum of
Support for ALL
“Theora”
Targeted
Spanish
Reading
Soc skills
Universal
Soc Studies
Basketball
Label behavior…not
people
Dec 7, 2007
Intensive
Continuum of
Support for
ALL:
“Molcom”
Anger man.
Prob Sol.
Targeted
Ind. play
Adult rel.
Self-assess
Attend.
Universal
Coop play
Peer interac
Label behavior…not
Dec 7, 2007 people
Student
Behavior
Teacher
Practice
Continua of
Responsiveness
& Support
CONTEXT
or
SETTING
School
Improvement
District
Operations
Comprehensive
screening
Early &
timely
decision
making
Databased
decision
making
Implementation
Fidelity
Support for
nonresponders
Need
for
better
Instructional
accountability
& justification
Assessment
-instruction
alignment
Resource
& time
use
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
CONTINUUM OF
CONTINUOUS
EVIDENCE-BASED
PROGRESS
INTERVENTIONS
MONITORING
UNIVERSAL
SCREENING
RtI
DATA-BASED
DECISION MAKING
& PROBLEM
SOLVING
CONTENT
EXPERTISE &
FLUENCY
TEAM-BASED
IMPLEMENTATION
Precision
Teaching
CBM
Early
Screening &
Intervention
Applied
Behavior
Analysis
Behavioral &
Instructional
Consultation
Prereferral
Interventions
Diagnostic
Prescriptive
Teaching
Teacher
Assistance
Teaming
Responsiveness to Intervention
Academic Systems
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•High Intensity
Circa 1996
1-5%
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
Universal Interventions
•All students
•Preventive, proactive
Behavioral Systems
80-90%
1-5%
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•Intense, durable procedures
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
80-90%
Universal Interventions
•All settings, all students
•Preventive, proactive
Responsiveness to
Intervention
Social
Sciences
Specials
SWPBS
Etc.
Literacy &
Writing
Numeracy
&
Sciences
Behavior
Continuum
Academic
Continuum
RTI
Integrated
Continuum
Mar 10 2010
RCT & Group Design PBIS Studies
Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Thornton, L.A., & Leaf, P.J. (2009). Altering school climate through
school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a grouprandomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), 100-115
Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of
elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 462-473.
Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of School-Wide
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a
randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior
Interventions, 12, 133-148.
Bradshaw, C.P., Reinke, W. M., Brown, L. D., Bevans, K.B., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). Implementation of
school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in elementary schools:
Observations from a randomized trial. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 1-26.
Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A., & Esperanza, J., (2009). A
randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior
support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133-145.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide
positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1-14.
Waasdorp, T. E., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (in press). The impact of school-wide positive
behavioral interventions and supports on bullying and peer rejection: A randomized control
effectiveness trial. Journal of School Psychology.
Academic-Behavior Connection
Algozzine, B., Wang, C., & Violette, A. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between
academic achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavioral
Interventions, 13, 3-16.
Burke, M. D., Hagan-Burke, S., & Sugai, G. (2003). The efficacy of function-based
interventions for students with learning disabilities who exhibit escape-maintained
problem behavior: Preliminary results from a single case study. Learning Disabilities
Quarterly, 26, 15-25.
McIntosh, K., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Horner, R. H. (2006). Demonstration of combined
efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and
behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavioral
Interventions, 8, 146-154.
McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Dickey, C. R., and Braun, D. H. (2008). Reading
skills and function of problem behavior in typical school settings. Journal of Special
Education, 42, 131-147.
Nelson, J. R., Johnson, A., & Marchand-Martella, N. (1996). Effects of direct instruction,
cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of
students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional and
Behavioral Disorders, 4, 53-62.
Wang, C., & Algozzine, B. (2011). Rethinking the relationship between reading and behavior
in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 100-109.
Dean Fixsen
Karen Blase
UNC
PRACTICE
“Making a
turn”
Effective
IMPLEMENTATION
Effective
Maximum
Student
Benefits
Not
Effective
Fixsen & Blase, 2009
Not Effective
Start
w/
What
Works
Focus
on
Fidelity
Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). J. Evid.-based Prac. in Sch.
Funding
Visibility
Political
Support
Policy
SWPBS
Implementation LEADERSHIP TEAM
Blueprint
(Coordination)
www.pbis.org
Training
Coaching
Evaluation
Local School/District Implementation
Demonstrations
Behavioral
Expertise
SWPBS
Practices
Classroom
Family
Non-classroom
• Smallest #
• Evidence-based
• Biggest, durable effect
Student
SCHOOL-WIDE
CLASSROOM
1.1. Leadership team
1.All school-wide
2.Behavior purpose statement
3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors
4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide
expected behavior
5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging
expected behavior
EVIDENCEBASED
INTERVENTION
PRACTICES
6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule
violations
INDIVIDUAL STUDENT
2.Function-based behavior support planning
3.Team- & data-based decision making
4.Comprehensive person-centered planning &
wraparound processes
5.Targeted social skills & self-management
instruction
6. Individualized instructional & curricular
accommodations
3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught,
reviewed, prompted, & supervised.
4.Maximum engagement through high rates of
opportunities to respond, delivery of evidencebased instructional curriculum & practices
5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays
of appropriate behavior.
6.Continuum of strategies for responding to
inappropriate behavior.
7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring &
evaluation
1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels
2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines &
environment
NONCLASSROOM
1.Positive expectations & routines
taught & encouraged
FAMILY ENGAGEMENT
1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all
families
2.Frequent, regular positive contacts,
2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, communications, & acknowledgements
move, interact)
3.Formal & active participation & involvement as
3.Precorrections & reminders
equal partner
4.Positive reinforcement
4.Access to system of integrated school &
community resources
ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS
~5%
~15%
TERTIARY
TERTIARY PREVENTION
PREVENTION
•• Function-based support
•• Wraparound
•• Person-centered planning
••
••
SECONDARY
SECONDARY PREVENTION
PREVENTION
•• Check in/out
•• Targeted social skills instruction
•• Peer-based supports
•• Social skills club
••
~80% of Students
PRIMARY
PRIMARYPREVENTION
PREVENTION
•• Teach SW expectations
•• Proactive SW discipline
•• Positive reinforcement
•• Effective instruction
•• Parent engagement
•• Active supervision