Transcript MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative DAVID BRANCH, Lucy Laney, Minneapolis P.S. CHARLIE EISENREICH, Apollo H.S., St Cloud P.

MN SW Positive
Behavior Support
Initiative
DAVID BRANCH, Lucy Laney, Minneapolis P.S.
CHARLIE EISENREICH, Apollo H.S., St Cloud P. S.
CHAR RYAN, MN Department of Education
GEORGE SUGAI, Center on PBIS at UConn
Nov 8, 2007
www.pbis.org
Purpose
• Overview of SWPBS in MN
• Implementation examples &
outcomes
• Procedures for getting involved
Agenda
• Intro to SWPBS – George
• Elem. SWPBS Experience – David
• Sec. SWPBS Experience – Charlie
• MN SWPBS - Ruth
SW-PBS Logic!
Successful individual student
behavior support is linked to
host environments or school
climates that are effective,
efficient, relevant, & durable
(Zins & Ponti, 1990)
Basics: 4
PBS
Elements
Supporting Social Competence &
Academic Achievement
OUTCOMES
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
PRACTICES
Supporting
Student Behavior
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
~5%
~15%
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Responsiveness to
Intervention:
Achievement
+
Social Behavior
Designing School-Wide Systems
for Student Success
Academic Systems
Behavioral Systems
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•High Intensity
1-5%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
Universal Interventions
•All students
•Preventive, proactive
5-10%
80-90%
1-5%
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•Intense, durable procedures
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
80-90%
Universal Interventions
•All settings, all students
•Preventive, proactive
Response to Intervention
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
DATA-BASED
CONTINUUM OF
DECISION MAKING
EVIDENCE& PROBLEM
BASED
SOLVING
INTERVENTIONS
CONTINUOUS
PROGRESS
MONITORING
STUDENT
PERFORMANCE
CONTINUUM of SWPBS
Tertiary Prevention
• Function-based support
•
Audit
•
~5%•
1. Identify existing efforts
•
by tier
~15%
2.Prevention
Specify outcome for each effort
Secondary
• Check in/out
3. Evaluate implementation accuracy
•
•
& outcome effectiveness
•
•
4. Eliminate/integrate based on
Primary Prevention
outcomes
• SWPBS
•
5. Establish
•
•
•
~80% of Students
decision rules (RtI)
GENERAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS:
“Getting Started”
Team
Agreements
Data-based
Action Plan
Evaluation
Implementation
School-wide Positive
Behavior Support
Systems
Classroom
Setting Systems
School-wide
Systems
School-wide Systems
1. Common purpose & approach to discipline
2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors
3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior
4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging
expected behavior
5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging
inappropriate behavior
6. Procedures for on-going monitoring &
evaluation
Classroom
Setting Systems
• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught
& encouraged
• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught &
encouraged
• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adultstudent interaction
• Active supervision
• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior
errors
• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors
• Effective academic instruction & curriculum
Nonclassroom
Setting Systems
• Positive expectations & routines
taught & encouraged
• Active supervision by all staff
– Scan, move, interact
• Precorrections & reminders
• Positive reinforcement
Individual Student
Systems
• Behavioral competence at school & district
levels
• Function-based behavior support planning
• Team- & data-based decision making
• Comprehensive person-centered planning &
wraparound processes
• Targeted social skills & self-management
instruction
• Individualized instructional & curricular
accommodations