SWPBS 10 Year Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut December 5, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org [email protected].
Download ReportTranscript SWPBS 10 Year Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut December 5, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org [email protected].
SWPBS 10 Year Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut December 5, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org [email protected] • SWPBS Development • Defining Features • Applications & Examples World Events in 1997 • Deep Blue defeats Garry Kasparov in chess rematch • Hong Kong reverts to China after 156 years as British Colony • Space station 'Mir' experiences life threatening malfunctions & accidents • 1st Harry Potter book published • Clinton US president of US & Chretien Canadian prime minister • Seinfeld, Men in Black, Candle in the Wind (E. John) • Millions commemorate 20th anniversary of Elvis' death • Princess Diana killed in Paris car crash • 3 high school students killed in Paducah KY • Iowa woman gives birth to septuplets; all survive • Adult sheep named Dolly successfully cloned in Scotland • Center on PBIS awarded to university collaborative Original logic: public health & disease prevention (Larson, 1994) • Tertiary (FEW) – Reduce complications, intensity, severity of current cases • Secondary (SOME) – Reduce current cases of problem behavior • Primary (ALL) – Reduce new cases of problem behavior Continuum of Effective Behavior Support Students with Chronic/Intense Problem Behavior (1 - 7%) Specialized Individual Interventions (Individual Student System) Tertiary Prevention Secondary Prevention Specialized Group Interventions (At-Risk System) Students At-Risk for Problem Behavior (5-15%) Students without Serious Problem Behaviors (80 -90%) Primary Prevention All Students in School Universal Interventions (School-Wide System Classroom System) Circa 1996 Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Supports Behavior Supports Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity 1-5% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive Circa 1997 5-10% 80-90% 1-5% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive Responsiveness to Intervention Academic + Social Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior FEW ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ALL ~80% of Students IMPLEMENTATION W/ INTEGRITY UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING STUDENT & TEAM PROBLEM PERFORMANCE SOLVING CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 RTI Continuum of Support for ALL 2008 SWPBS (PBIS) is about…. Improving classroom & school climate Integrating Decreasing academic & reactive behavior management initiatives Improving support for students w/ EBD Maximizing academic achievement BIG IDEA Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, durable, & scalable (Zins & Ponti, 1990) SWPBS Conceptual Foundations Behaviorism ABA Laws of Behavior Applied Behavioral Technology PBS Social Validity SWPBS All Students Positive Behavior Support Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior SYSTEMS DATA PRACTICES Circa 1996 Supporting Student Behavior Basics: 4 PBS Elements 2. Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES 1. Supporting Decision Making 4. Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES 3. Supporting Student Behavior SWPBS Practices Classroom Family Non-classroom • Smallest # • Evidence-based • Biggest, durable effect Student School-wide 1. Common purpose & approach to discipline 2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation Redesign Learning & Teaching Environment Saying & doing it “Positively!” Keep off the grass! Employee Entrance at Tulsa Downtown Doubletree Expectations Teaching Matrix SETTING All Settings Hallways Playgrounds Cafeteria Library/ Compute r Lab Study, read, compute. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Assembly Bus Respect Ourselves Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk. Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/feet to self. Help/share with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watch. Use appropriate applause. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriately. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriately. Respect Property Getting “Paw’d” with “Paws-itives” Janney Jaguers Jan 06 FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals Pre 3000 Total ODRs 2500 2000 1500 Post 1000 500 0 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 Academic Years Non-classroom • Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged • Active supervision by all staff – Scan, move, interact • Precorrections & reminders • Positive reinforcement Franzen, K., & Kamps, D. (2008). Classroom • Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged • Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged • Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adultstudent interaction • Active supervision • Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors • Frequent precorrections for chronic errors • Effective academic instruction & curriculum Allday & Pakurar (2007) Typical Contexts/ Routines All Morning Meeting Classroom-Wide Rules/Expectations Respect Others Respect Property Respect Self Use inside voice. Recycle paper. Do your best. Raise hand to Put writing tools inside Ask. answer/talk. desk. Put announcements in Eyes on speaker. Put check by my desk. Give brief answers. announcements. Keep feet on floor. Homework Do own work. Turn in before lesson. Transition Use inside voice. Keep hands to self. “I Need Assistance” Teacher Directed Raise hand or show “Assistance Card”. Wait 2 minutes & try again. Eyes on speaker. Keep hands to self. Independent Work Use inside voice. Keep hands to self. Problem to Solve Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Put homework neatly in Turn in lesson on time. box. Do homework Touch your work only. night/day before. Put/get materials first. Keep hands to self. Have plan. Go directly. Have materials ready. Have plan. Ask if unclear. Use materials as intended. Use materials as intended. Return with done. Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Have plan. Ask. Use time as planned. Ask. Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Individual Student • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations % Intervals w/ P.B. for Bryce % Intervals w/ P.B. Baseline 100 90 80 70 60 ContraIndicated Indicated ContraIndicated Indicated 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 Sessions* *Data points with arrows indicate no medication % Intervals w/ P.B. for Carter 100 Baseline Indicated 90 ContraIndicated Contrandicated Indicated Indicated Modified % Intervals w/ P.B. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Sessions 17 19 21 23 25 27 Family • Continuum of positive behavior support for all families • Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements • Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner • Access to system of integrated school & community resources CONTINUUM of SWPBS TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound/PCP Audit • Specialized interventions ~5%• 1. Identify existing practices • 2. Specify outcome for each effort ~15% • • • • • • by tier SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out 3. Evaluate implementation Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports accuracy & outcome Social skills club effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on PRIMARY4. PREVENTION Teach & encourage positive outcomes SW expectations Proactive SW discipline 5. Establish decision rules (RtI) Effective instruction Parent engagement • • • • ~80% of Students BIG IDEA Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, durable, & scalable (Zins & Ponti, 1990)