School-Wide Positive Behavior Support & School Climate George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 8 2011 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org [email protected].
Download ReportTranscript School-Wide Positive Behavior Support & School Climate George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 8 2011 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org [email protected].
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support & School Climate George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 8 2011 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org [email protected] SWPBS (aka PBIS/RtI) is Framework for enhancing adoption & implementation of Continuum of evidencebased interventions to achieve Academically & behaviorally important outcomes for All students SWPBS is about…. Improving classroom & school climate Integrating Decreasing academic & reactive behavior management initiatives Improving support for students w/ EBD Maximizing academic achievement Worry “Train & Hope” WAIT for New Problem Expect, But HOPE for Implementation Hire EXPERT to Train Practice REACT to Problem Behavior Select & ADD Practice Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior PRACTICE “Making a turn” Effective IMPLEMENTATION Effective Maximum Student Benefits Not Effective Fixsen & Blase, 2009 Not Effective Start w/ What Works Focus on Fidelity Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). J. Evid.-based Prac. in Sch. PBS 1980s Positive Behavior Support ABA 1968 Applied Behavior Analysis PBIS 1997 Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports SWPBS SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORTS Converging Influences 1990s Implementation Science RtI 1990s ResponsetoIntervention 9 Prevention Logic for All Biglan, 1995; Mayer, 1995; Walker et al., 1996 Decrease development of new problem behaviors Prevent worsening & reduce intensity of existing problem behaviors Eliminate Teach, triggers & monitor, & maintainers of acknowledge problem prosocial behaviors behavior Redesign of teaching environments…not students IMPLEMENTATION TEAM FACILITATED W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF PROBLEM EVIDENCE-BASED SOLVING INTERVENTIONS DATABASED DECISION MAKING UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI CONTENT EXPERTISE & FLUENCY CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ALL ~80% of Students Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 Continuum of Support for ALL Math Intensive Science Continuum of Support for ALL “Theora” Targeted Spanish Reading Soc skills Universal Soc Studies Basketball Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007 Responsiveness to Intervention Social Sciences Specials SWPBS Etc. Literacy & Writing Numeracy & Sciences Responsiveness to Intervention Academic Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity Circa 1996 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive Behavioral Systems 80-90% 1-5% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive Behavior Continuum Academic Continuum RTI Integrated Continuum Mar 10 2010 ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS - EXAMPLE ~5% ~15% TERTIARY TERTIARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Function-based support •• Wraparound •• Person-centered planning •• •• SECONDARY SECONDARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Check in/out •• Targeted social skills instruction •• Peer-based supports •• Social skills club •• ~80% of Students PRIMARY PRIMARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Teach SW expectations •• Proactive SW discipline •• Positive reinforcement •• Effective instruction •• Parent engagement •• SWPBS Practices Classroom Non-classroom Student & Family Family SCHOOL-WIDE CLASSROOM 1.1. Leadership team 1.All school-wide 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior EVIDENCEBASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidencebased instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, communications, & acknowledgements move, interact) 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as 3.Precorrections & reminders equal partner 4.Positive reinforcement 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources Team GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation Sample Teaming Matrix Initiative, Committee Purpose Outcome Target Group Staff Involved SIP/SID Attendance Committee Increase attendance Increase % of students attending daily All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee Goal #2 Character Education Improve character Improve character All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen Goal #3 Safety Committee Improve safety Predictable response to threat/crisis Dangerous students Has not met Goal #3 School Spirit Committee Enhance school spirit Improve morale All students Has not met Discipline Committee Improve behavior Decrease office referrals Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis DARE Committee Prevent drug use High/at-risk drug users Don EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades Goal #3 Goal #2 Goal #3 Teaching Matrix All Settings Hallways Playgrounds Cafeteria Library/ Compute r Lab Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Study, read, compute. Assembly Bus Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/feet to self. Help/share with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watch. Use appropriate applause. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Respect Property Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriately. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriately. Respect Ourselves Expectations SETTING Teaching directly in context Teaching Academics & Behaviors ADJUST for Efficiency MONITOR & ACKNOWLEDGE Continuously DEFINE Simply MODEL PRACTICE In Setting Family Teaching Matrix Expectations Respect Ourselves Respect Others Respect Property SETTING At home Morning Routine Homework Meal Times In Car Play Bedtime Non-Classroom Management: Self-Assessment Name______________________________ Date_____________ Setting □ Hallway □ Entrance □ Cafeteria □ Playground □ Other_______________ Time Start_________ Time End _________ Tally each Positive Student Contacts Total # Tally each Negative Student Contacts Total # Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____: 1 1. Did I have at least 4 positive for 1 negative student contacts? Yes No 2. Did I move throughout the area I was supervising? Yes No 3. Did I frequently scan the area I was supervising? Yes No 4. Did I positively interact with most of the students in the area? Yes No 5. Did I handle most minor rule violations quickly and quietly? Yes No 6. Did I follow school procedures for handling major rule violations? Yes No 7. Do I know our school-wide expectations (positively stated rules)? Yes No 8. Did I positively acknowledge at least 5 different students for displaying our school-wide expectations? Yes No Overall active supervision score: 7-8 “yes” = “Super Supervision” 5-6 “yes” = “So-So Supervision” <5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed” # Yes______ Typical Contexts/ Routines All Morning Meeting Classroom-Wide Rules/Expectations Respect Others Respect Property Respect Self Use inside voice. Recycle paper. Do your best. Raise hand to Put writing tools inside Ask. answer/talk. desk. Put announcements in Eyes on speaker. Put check by my desk. Give brief answers. announcements. Keep feet on floor. Homework Do own work. Turn in before lesson. Transition Use inside voice. Keep hands to self. “I Need Assistance” Teacher Directed Raise hand or show “Assistance Card”. Wait 2 minutes & try again. Eyes on speaker. Keep hands to self. Independent Work Use inside voice. Keep hands to self. Problem to Solve Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Put homework neatly in Turn in lesson on time. box. Do homework Touch your work only. night/day before. Put/get materials first. Keep hands to self. Have plan. Go directly. Have materials ready. Have plan. Ask if unclear. Use materials as intended. Use materials as intended. Return with done. Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Have plan. Ask. Use time as planned. Ask. Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Classroom Management: Self-Assessment Teacher__________________________ Rater_______________________ Date___________ Instructional Activity Time Start_______ Time End________ Tally each Positive Student Contacts Total # Tally each Negative Student Contacts Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____ to 1 Total # Classroom Management Practice Rating 1. I have arranged my classroom to minimize crowding and distraction Yes No 2. I have maximized structure and predictability in my classroom (e.g., explicit classroom routines, specific directions, etc.). Yes No 3. I have posted, taught, reviewed, and reinforced 3-5 positively stated expectations (or rules). Yes No 4. I provided more frequent acknowledgement for appropriate behaviors than inappropriate behaviors (See top of page). Yes No 5. I provided each student with multiple opportunities to respond and participate during instruction. Yes No 6. My instruction actively engaged students in observable ways (e.g., writing, verbalizing) Yes No 7. I actively supervised my classroom (e.g., moving, scanning) during instruction. Yes No 8. I ignored or provided quick, direct, explicit reprimands/redirections in response to inappropriate behavior. Yes No 9. I have multiple strategies/systems in place to acknowledge appropriate behavior (e.g., class point systems, praise, etc.). Yes No Yes No 10. In general, I have provided specific feedback in response to social and academic behavior errors and correct responses. Overall classroom management score: 10-8 “yes” = “Super” 7-5 “yes” = “So-So” # Yes___ <5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed” Are “Rewards” Dangerous? “…our research team has conducted a series of reviews and analysis of (the reward) literature; our conclusion is that there is no inherent negative property of reward. Our analyses indicate that the argument against the use of rewards is an overgeneralization based on a narrow set of circumstances.” – Cameron, 2002 • Cameron & Pierce, 1994, 2002 • Cameron, Banko & Pierce, 2001 Funding Visibility Political Support Policy SWPBS Implementation LEADERSHIP TEAM Blueprint (Coordination) www.pbis.org Training Coaching Evaluation Local School/District Implementation Demonstrations Behavioral Expertise Evaluation Criteria Effective • Achieve desired outcome? Efficient • Doable by real implementer? Relevant • Contextual & cultural? Durable • Lasting? Scalable • Transportable? Logical • Conceptually Sound? 4 Main Data Concerns Student outcomes Systems integration Practice selection Practice implementation Academic-Behavior Connection Algozzine, B., Wang, C., & Violette, A. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between academic achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 13, 3-16. Burke, M. D., Hagan-Burke, S., & Sugai, G. (2003). The efficacy of function-based interventions for students with learning disabilities who exhibit escape-maintained problem behavior: Preliminary results from a single case study. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 15-25. McIntosh, K., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Horner, R. H. (2006). Demonstration of combined efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 8, 146-154. McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Dickey, C. R., and Braun, D. H. (2008). Reading skills and function of problem behavior in typical school settings. Journal of Special Education, 42, 131-147. Nelson, J. R., Johnson, A., & Marchand-Martella, N. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 53-62. Wang, C., & Algozzine, B. (2011). Rethinking the relationship between reading and behavior in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 100-109. RCT & Group Design PBIS Studies Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Thornton, L.A., & Leaf, P.J. (2009). Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), 100-115 Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 462473. Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133-148. Bradshaw, C.P., Reinke, W. M., Brown, L. D., Bevans, K.B., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). Implementation of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 1-26. Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A., & Esperanza, J., (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133-145. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1-14.