Transcript Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai US Dept. of Educ.Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut July 1 2011 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org [email protected].

Addressing Individual
Challenging Behavior through
Function-based Support
George Sugai
US Dept. of Educ.Center on PBIS
Center for Behavioral Education & Research
University of Connecticut
July 1 2011
www.pbis.org
www.cber.org
www.swis.org
[email protected]
Basics Review
SWPBS (aka PBIS/RtI) is
Framework for enhancing
adoption & implementation of
Continuum of evidencebased interventions to
achieve
Academically & behaviorally
important outcomes for
All students
Integrated
Elements
Supporting Social Competence &
Academic Achievement
OUTCOMES
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
PRACTICES
Supporting
Student Behavior
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
FEW
SOME
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
ALL
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Prevention Logic for All
Biglan, 1995; Mayer, 1995; Walker et al., 1996
Decrease
development
of new
problem
behaviors
Prevent
worsening &
reduce
intensity of
existing
problem
behaviors
Eliminate
Teach,
triggers &
monitor, &
maintainers of acknowledge
problem
prosocial
behaviors
behavior
Redesign of teaching environments…not students
Intensive
Targeted
Universal
Few
Some
All
Dec 7, 2007
Continuum of
Support for
ALL
Math
Intensive
Science
Continuum of
Support for ALL
“Theora”
Targeted
Spanish
Reading
Soc skills
Universal
Soc Studies
Basketball
Label behavior…not
people
Dec 7, 2007
Intensive
Continuum of
Support for
ALL:
“Molcom”
Anger man.
Prob Sol.
Targeted
Ind. play
Adult rel.
Self-assess
Attend.
Universal
Coop play
Peer interac
Label behavior…not
Dec 7, 2007 people
Responsiveness to Intervention
Academic Systems
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•High Intensity
Circa 1996
1-5%
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
Universal Interventions
•All students
•Preventive, proactive
Behavioral Systems
80-90%
1-5%
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•Intense, durable procedures
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
80-90%
Universal Interventions
•All settings, all students
•Preventive, proactive
SWPBS
Practices
Classroom
Family
Non-classroom
• Smallest #
• Evidence-based
• Biggest, durable effect
Student
SCHOOL-WIDE
CLASSROOM
1.1. Leadership team
1.All school-wide
2.Behavior purpose statement
3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors
4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide
expected behavior
5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging
expected behavior
EVIDENCEBASED
INTERVENTION
PRACTICES
6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule
violations
INDIVIDUAL STUDENT
2.Function-based behavior support planning
3.Team- & data-based decision making
4.Comprehensive person-centered planning &
wraparound processes
5.Targeted social skills & self-management
instruction
6. Individualized instructional & curricular
accommodations
3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught,
reviewed, prompted, & supervised.
4.Maximum engagement through high rates of
opportunities to respond, delivery of evidencebased instructional curriculum & practices
5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays
of appropriate behavior.
6.Continuum of strategies for responding to
inappropriate behavior.
7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring &
evaluation
1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels
2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines &
environment
NONCLASSROOM
1.Positive expectations & routines
taught & encouraged
FAMILY ENGAGEMENT
1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all
families
2.Frequent, regular positive contacts,
2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, communications, & acknowledgements
move, interact)
3.Formal & active participation & involvement as
3.Precorrections & reminders
equal partner
4.Positive reinforcement
4.Access to system of integrated school &
community resources
School-wide
1. Leadership team
2. Behavior purpose statement
3. Set of positive expectations & behaviors
4. Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide
expected behavior
5. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected
behavior
6. Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule
violations
7. Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring &
evaluation
Teaching Academics &
Behaviors
ADJUST for
Efficiency
MONITOR &
ACKNOWLEDGE
Continuously
DEFINE
Simply
MODEL
PRACTICE
In Setting
Expectations
Teaching
Matrix
SETTING
All
Settings
Hallways
Playgrounds
Cafeteria
Library/
Compute
r Lab
Study,
read,
compute.
Sit in one
spot.
Watch for
your stop.
Assembly
Bus
Respect
Ourselves
Be on task.
Give your
best effort.
Be
prepared.
Walk.
Have a plan.
Eat all your
food.
Select
healthy
foods.
Respect
Others
Be kind.
Hands/feet
to self.
Help/share
with
others.
Use normal
voice
volume.
Walk to
right.
Play safe.
Include
others.
Share
equipment.
Practice
good table
manners
Whisper.
Return
books.
Listen/watch.
Use
appropriate
applause.
Use a quiet
voice.
Stay in your
seat.
Respect
Property
Recycle.
Clean up
after self.
Pick up
litter.
Maintain
physical
space.
Use
equipment
properly.
Put litter in
garbage can.
Replace
trays &
utensils.
Clean up
eating area.
Push in
chairs.
Treat
books
carefully.
Pick up.
Treat chairs
appropriately.
Wipe your
feet.
Sit
appropriately.
Dean Fixsen
Karen Blase
UNC
PRACTICE
“Making a
turn”
Effective
IMPLEMENTATION
Effective
Maximum
Student
Benefits
Not
Effective
Fixsen & Blase, 2009
Not Effective
Start
w/
What
Works
Focus
on
Fidelity
Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). J. Evid.-based Prac. in Sch.
Evaluation Criteria
Effective
• Desired Outcomes?
Efficient
• Doable?
Relevant
• Contextual & Cultural?
Durable
• Lasting?
Scalable
• Transportable?
RCT & Group Design PBIS Studies
Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Thornton, L.A., & Leaf, P.J. (2009). Altering school climate
through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a
group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), 100-115
Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of
school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the
organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 462473.
Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of School-Wide
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a
randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive
Behavior Interventions, 12, 133-148.
Bradshaw, C.P., Reinke, W. M., Brown, L. D., Bevans, K.B., & Leaf, P.J. (2008).
Implementation of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in
elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education & Treatment of
Children, 31, 1-26.
Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A., & Esperanza, J.,
(2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide
positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior
Interventions, 11, 133-145.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for
school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1-14.
Academic-Behavior Connection
Algozzine, B., Wang, C., & Violette, A. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between
academic achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavioral
Interventions, 13, 3-16.
Burke, M. D., Hagan-Burke, S., & Sugai, G. (2003). The efficacy of function-based
interventions for students with learning disabilities who exhibit escape-maintained
problem behavior: Preliminary results from a single case study. Learning Disabilities
Quarterly, 26, 15-25.
McIntosh, K., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Horner, R. H. (2006). Demonstration of combined
efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and
behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavioral
Interventions, 8, 146-154.
McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Dickey, C. R., and Braun, D. H. (2008). Reading
skills and function of problem behavior in typical school settings. Journal of Special
Education, 42, 131-147.
Nelson, J. R., Johnson, A., & Marchand-Martella, N. (1996). Effects of direct instruction,
cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of
students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional and
Behavioral Disorders, 4, 53-62.
Wang, C., & Algozzine, B. (2011). Rethinking the relationship between reading and behavior
in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 100-109.
Funding
Visibility
Political
Support
Policy
SWPBS
Implementation LEADERSHIP TEAM
Blueprint
(Coordination)
www.pbis.org
Training
Coaching
Evaluation
Local School/District Implementation
Demonstrations
Behavioral
Expertise
ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS
~5%
~15%
TERTIARY PREVENTION
• Function-based support
• Wraparound
• Person-centered planning
•
•
SECONDARY PREVENTION
• Check in/out
• Targeted social skills instruction
• Peer-based supports
• Social skills club
•
~80% of Students
PRIMARY PREVENTION
• Teach SW expectations
• Proactive SW discipline
• Positive reinforcement
• Effective instruction
• Parent engagement
•
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
CONTINUUM OF
CONTINUOUS
EVIDENCE-BASED
PROGRESS
INTERVENTIONS
MONITORING
PBIS
UNIVERSAL
SCREENING
&
RtI
DATA-BASED
DECISION MAKING
& PROBLEM
SOLVING
CONTENT
EXPERTISE &
FLUENCY
TEAM-BASED
IMPLEMENTATION
District-Region
School
SWPBS
Leadership
Team
Specialized Behavior
Support Team
SWPBS Tier 1
T1 Systems
T1 Practices
Group-based Tier 2
T2 Systems
T2 Practices
Individual Tier 3
T3 Systems
T3 Practices
-O
ct
3N
o
16 v
-N
o
30 v
-N
ov
7D
ec
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
eb
8F
e
17 b
-F
eb
25
-F
eb
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
13 r
-A
p
29 r
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
100
90
10
0
BL
CI/
CO
CI/CO
+75%
CI/CO
+80%
80
80
90
School Days
CI/CO
+90%
70
Helena
60
50
40
30
20
10
100
0
90
70
Jade
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
Farrell
70
60
50
40
30
20
Began
meds.
Class B
Results
Check In/Out Pt Card
Name________________ Date ________
GOALS
9:30
10:30
11:30
1. RESPECT OTHERS 2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0 2 1 0
2. MANAGE SELF
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0 2 1 0
3. SOLVE
PROBLEMS
RESPONSIBLY
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0 2 1 0
Rating Scale
2 = Great
1 = Ok
0 = Goal Not Met
8:30
Goal _____
Pts Possible _____
Pts Received_____
% of Pts _____
Goal Met? Y N
12:30
1:30
Class B
Results +
Composite
Peers
100
BL
CI/
CO
90
CI/CO
+75%
CI/CO
+80%
CI/CO
+90%
80
Helena
70
60
Peer
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
Jade
80
70
60
Peer
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
Farrell
80
70
Peer
60
50
40
30
20
School Days
eb
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
r
13
-A
pr
29
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
-F
25
17
-F
eb
eb
Began
meds.
8F
-O
ct
3N
ov
16
-N
ov
30
-N
ov
7D
ec
0
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
eb
10
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
50
100
BL
90
Study 2
Results
CI/
CO
CI/CO
75%
CI/CO
80%
FB
plan
FB
plan 2
80
Marce llus
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
Blair
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Be n
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Oliv ia
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
e
b
8F
e
b
17
-F
e
b
25
-F
e
b
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
r
13
-A
p
29 r
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
-O
ct
3N
ov
16
-N
o
30 v
-N
ov
7D
ec
0
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
90
School Days
Study 2
Results +
Composite
Peer
100
BL
90
CI/
CO
CI/CO
75%
CI/CO
80%
FB
plan
FB
plan 2
80
Marce llus
70
60
Peer
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Peer
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Be n
70
60
Peer
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
Peer
Oliv ia
60
50
40
30
20
10
School Days
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
r
13
-A
p
29 r
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
eb
8F
eb
17
-F
e
25 b
-F
eb
-O
ct
3N
ov
16
-N
o
30 v
-N
ov
7D
ec
0
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
Blair
70