Transcript Slide 1

Dropout Prevention for Students with Disabilities: Lessons Learned
National High School Center Summer Institute
Advancing High School Student Success:
Building Systems of Support
National Dropout Prevention Center for Students
with Disabilities
Clemson University
LESSONS LEARNED
Causes

Problem behaviors coupled with academic difficulties or
prior academic failures are key risk factors that are
predictive of school dropout.

Repeated use of exclusionary discipline practices, such
as suspension, has been identified as one of the major
factors contributing to dropout.

High absenteeism and retention are serious risk factors
for dropping out that can be monitored by schools.

Academic progress and school completion are not
equally distributed across disability, income, or ethnicity.
How Do We Influence Dropout?

School policies & procedures


Structure & class assignment


School size, transitions, tracking
Course content & instruction


Discipline, grading, standards, retention
Boredom, curriculum quality
Climate & relationships

Alienation, negative interactions
LESSONS LEARNED
Consequences

Dropouts are more likely to be unemployed or employed
in low-skilled, lower-paying positions.

Dropouts are more likely than high school graduates to
need the support of living with parents in early
adulthood, experience health problems, engage in
criminal activities, and become dependent on welfare
and other government programs.

Dropouts are more likely to commit crimes as compared
to students who complete school. Three to five years
after dropping out, the cumulative arrest rate for youth
with SED is 73%.
LESSONS LEARNED
Prevention




Establish a leadership team to
actively coordinate
implementation of dropout
prevention efforts

Increase family engagement
and school involvement

Create school environments
that are inviting, safe, and
supportive

Focus on effective instruction
Create a local action team to
analyze data and address
dropout prevention at the local
level

Listen to students

Administrators are key and
their support is essential
Intervene early, often as early
as preschool

Use proven practices
Establish systems for routine
monitoring of risk indicators
associated with dropout
LESSONS LEARNED
Capacity Building

Take a systemic approach to address dropout prevention

Conduct causal analysis

Use data to guide program development, professional
development, and other school improvement efforts

Consider multiple levels of implementation

Examine the influence of other performance indicators
on school completion
N D PC -SD D ropout Prevention
Intervention Fram ew ork
© 2007 National Dropout Prevention Center for
Students with Disabilities at Clemson University –
All rights reserved
OUR IMPACT

Improved awareness and understanding through
increased access to evidence-based dropout
prevention practices, interventions, and programs

Increased state capacity to address dropout issues
through development of a data–driven framework and
provision of direct technical assistance, capacity
building forums, and consultation to SEAs and LEAs

Expanded state and local practices through intense
technical assistance and coaching on the
development of model sites that will serve as
exemplars that others can replicate
Contact Information
Sandra Covington-Smith
[email protected]
NDPC-SD
Clemson University
209 Martin Street
Clemson, SC 29631
Phone: (864) 656-1817
Fax:
(864) 656-0136
www.ndpc-sd.org