Superintendent’s Dropout Challenge Integrating Dropout Prevention and School Improvement
Download ReportTranscript Superintendent’s Dropout Challenge Integrating Dropout Prevention and School Improvement
Superintendent’s Dropout Challenge Integrating Dropout Prevention and School Improvement December 2, 2009 MDE Dropout Challenge Support Team Leisa Gallagher, Challenge Coordinator Jan Ellis, Office of State Superintendent Bersheril Bailey, GLE at Learning Point Assoc. Susan Codere Kelly, HSCE Project Coordinator 11-17-09 1 Dropout Challenge • Introduced by State Superintendent Flanagan on June 30, 2009 • MDE Dropout Challenge Website • www.Michigan.gov/dropoutchallenge • http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7140-5235_53792---,00.html 11-17-09 2 2009-10 Dropout Challenge • In every Michigan elementary, middle, and high school • Identify 10-15 students in or nearing a transition year, who exhibit multiple risk factors • Provide research-based supports and interventions 11-17-09 3 Challenge Overview • Turning the Tide • Early Warning Signs – Poor grades in core subjects – Grade retention – Low attendance – Disengagement in the classroom • Implementing the Challenge • Recognizing Progress 11-17-09 4 Alliance for Excellent Education Fact Sheet High School Dropouts in America – Who is dropping out? •Where are students dropping out? – Why do students drop out? – What are the costs of dropping out? See 2-page handout 11-17-09 5 Michigan Data • Begin with the data • The data is not new • Why focus on dropout prevention? 11-17-09 6 CLASS OF 2008 DISTRICT AND BUILDING GRADUATION RATE ANALYSIS 2008 District Graduation Rate Overview Number of School Districts Total Number of School Districts Districts with Grad Rates at 100% Percent of Districts 609 Number of Students Percent of Students 142,564 9 1% 283 0.2% Districts with Grad Rates from 90-100% 140 23% 27,117 19.0% Districts with Grad rates from 80-89% 230 38% 53,294 37.4% Districts with Grad rates from 70-79% 95 16% 22,722 15.9% Districts with Grad rates from 0-69% 135 22% 39,148 27.5% 2008 All Building Graduation Rate Overview All Buildings Percent of Buildings Number of Students Percent of Students Total Number of School Buildings 972 131,204 Buildings with Grad Rates at 100% 23 2% 772 0.6% Buildings with Grad Rates from 90-100% 319 33% 65,259 49.7% Buildings with Grad rates from 80-89% 217 22% 33,883 25.8% Buildings with Grad rates from 70-79% 62 6% 10,241 7.8% Buildings with Grad rates from 60-69% 44 5% 5,995 4.6% Buildings with Grad rates from 50-59% 47 5% 2,435 1.9% Buildings with Grad rates from 40-49% 36 4% 1,828 1.4% Buildings with Grad rates from 30-39% 39 4% 1,724 1.3% Buildings with Grad rates from 20-29% 65 7% 2,709 2.1% Buildings with Grad rates from 10-19% 64 7% 3,713 2.8% Buildings with Grad rates from 0-9% 56 6% 2,645 2.0% 76% or 99,914 students attend 559 schools where eight out of ten students graduate 11-17-09 9.6% or 12,619 students attend 289 schools where less than 1 out of 2 students graduate 7.5% or 9,896 students attend 185 schools where less than 1 out of every three students graduate 7 Dropout Prevention IES Practice Guide Recommendations, p. 6 • Diagnostic – Identify students at risk of dropping out • Targeted Interventions – Assign adult advocates – Provide academic support and enrichment – Implement programs to improve classroom behavior • Schoolwide Interventions – Personalize the learning environment – Provide rigorous and relevant instruction 11-17-09 8 Dropout Prevention IES Practice Guide • Recommendation Checklist, pp. 10-11 • Lists 6 recommendations with tasks • Supporting information for each recommendation – – – – Level of evidence Brief summary of evidence to support recommendation How to carry out recommendation Potential roadblocks and suggested approaches • Conclusion • Appendix D – Technical information on the studies 11-17-09 9 Gallery Walk IES Recommendation Checklist, pp. 10-11 For each recommendation, indicate • Green dot – practice currently in place • Yellow dot – practice in development, needs strengthening • Red dot – practice critical, need to adopt 11-17-09 10 Gallery Walk Reflection • Summarize Responses • Resources to Support Recommendations 11-17-09 11 Resources National High School Center http://www.betterhighschools.org/pubs/#Dropout – Developing Early Warning Systems to Identify Potential High School Dropouts • Guide • Tool – Approaches to Dropout Prevention: Heeding Early Warning Signs with Appropriate Interventions (See excerpt in packet) 11-17-09 12 Michigan Student Information Log Early Warning Signs (EWS) Adapted from NHS Center Tool • Student Information • A,B,Cs • Attendance • Behavior • Content - Academic Course/Credit 11-17-09 13 Implementation Resource Bringing Off-Track Youth into the Center of High School Reform • Jobs for the Future • Lessons and Tools from Leading Communities – Improving Schools’ Capacity to Keep Students On Track – Expanding the Options – Improving and Supporting Options 11-17-09 14 Additional Resources • Everyone Graduates (Johns Hopkins) http://www.every1graduates.org/ Putting Middle Grades Students on the Graduation Path (Balfanz) http://every1graduates.org/PDFs/NMSA_ExecutiveSummary_Balfanz.pdf http://every1graduates.org/PDFs/NMSA_Policy_Brief_Balfanz.pdf • Center on Instruction http://www.centeroninstruction.org/ • America’s Promise http://www.silentepidemic.org/ 11-17-09 15 Integrating Dropout Prevention in the School Improvement Plan • Where do the Dropout Prevention Recommendations fit in the School Improvement Framework? • Does your school improvement plan extend deep enough to – reduce the dropout risk? – address the interaction between the As, Bs, and Cs? • Use matrix to analyze alignment. 11-17-09 16 Dropout Prevention • 2009-10 Focus on – Awareness – Developing EWS and Supports – Identify 10-15 students – Share results • 2010-11 System-wide initiative – Fully integrated into school improvement plan 11-17-09 17 Graduation Town Digital Learning Community • For Challenge Schools • Supported by Title IID Technology Funds • Hosted by MASSP • Stay tuned for more information 11-17-09 18 Dropout Prevention Summit • Date in February 2010 TBD • Additional support for identifying and supporting students at risk of dropping out • Emphasis on taking research to practice • Survey: Live and/or e-conference options 11-17-09 19 Contact Information Leisa Gallagher Susan Codere Kelly Dropout Challenge Coordinator [email protected] HSCE Project Coordinator [email protected] Jan Ellis Bersheril Bailey Office of the Superintendent [email protected] MDE Liaison, GLE at Learning Point Associates [email protected] 11-17-09 20