Ozone Depletion I
Download
Report
Transcript Ozone Depletion I
Peacekeeping and Intervention
What Happened in Darfur?
Failed state
Poverty
Natural resources crises
Security dilemma among ethnic groups
Small group of extremists
– Arab Janjaweed militia
Leadership and manipulation of ethnic
symbols, myths and divisions
Some 70,000 dead, 2.3mn displaced
African Union peacekeeping troops
Peacekeeping
Insertion of independent international forces
between warring parties, with the consent of both
sides to the conflict
Strategy coined in 1956 by Dag Hammarskjold
and Lester Pearson
Principles:
– Consent by warring parties
– Neutrality of troops
– Use of force only in self-defense
Case: the Suez Canal Crisis (1956)
Egypt’s Gamal Nasser privatizes Suez
Egypt sponsors guerilla attacks against Israel
Israel invades Sinai, claims self-defense
Pressure from US to end the conflict
Parties agree to cease fire, Hammarskold and Pearson devise
a peacekeeping plan and send UN troops
Conditions for Successful
Peacekeeping
Parties want to disengage
– Stalemate
– Costly war of attrition
– Majority wants to avoid war
Interest by great powers to limit conflict
– Interest to contain conflict
– Coercive cooperation
– Consensus in Security Council
UN Peacekeeping
UN Peacekeeping missions
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Series1
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980's
1990s
2
2
6
3
5
45
Other Peacekeeping Forces
NATO
African Union
EU forces
Case: Peacekeeping in former
Yugoslavia
The Srebrenica massacre
Dayton Agreement between
Croatia, Yugoslavia, and
Bosnia and Hertzegovina
(1995)
UN peacekeeping force
monitors ceasefire
NATO-led multinational
Implementation Force (IFOR)
took over in December 1995
NATO force replaced by The
European Union Police
Mission in 2002
Intervention
Military intervention
– interference with force in the internal affairs of another state
Limited military action
Blockade
Support opposition
Military advisers
Economic assistance
Broadcasts and speeches
Is Humanitarian Intervention
Justified?
Yes:
– Morally required
– Stop genocide and crimes
against humanity
– When humanitarian crises
threaten peace
– Customary right to
humanitarian intervention
No:
– Contradicts sovereignty
– States should tender to their
own security first and foremost
– Strategic rather humanitarian
motives prevail
– Applied arbitrary
– Slippery slope to aggression
Conditions for Intervention
UN Charter: sovereignty and non-intervention
Authorized by UN resolution
– Collective security: Iraq 1990
– Operation Provide Comfort in Northern Iraq (1991)
NATO lead missions, followed by UN missions
-Collective security: Afghanistan (2001)
-Kosovo (1999)
Case: Kosovo Intervention
Guerrilla war intensifies 1998
Tens of thousands killed, hundreds of thousands
displaced
Russia and China block UN decision on
intervention
NATO air strikes 1999
Rwanda: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?
Risks of Intervention
Casualties for international forces
Lack of domestic support
Intractable missions: Somalia
Suspicion of imperialism
Difficult to force peaceful co-existence