Bouquet Model. - Kansas State Department of Education
Download
Report
Transcript Bouquet Model. - Kansas State Department of Education
Proposed State Accountability System
September 2014
Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner
Kansas State Department of Education
All students grades 3-8 take the same state assessment.
All students in HS would take the state assessment, unless
they had already demonstrated College & Career Readiness
on another assessment (ACT, SAT, CPASS, etc.) commonly
referred to as the Bouquet Model.
The state assessment would be the SBAC assessment.
The state board approved the Bouquet Model, but chose to
have CETE develop the state assessment.
Approved the Kansas ESEA Flex Waiver for one more year, 2014-15
Removed our “High Risk” status, meaning we can move forward with
our teacher/leader evaluation model, and how we use student growth
as a significant factor
Allows us to move the use of student growth as a significant factor to
the 2017-18 school year.
Exempts Kansas from reporting 2014 assessment results due to the
DDoS situation during the testing window.
Did NOT approve the Kansas Assessment Bouquet Model
• Performance on ACT, SAT, State Assessment is not comparable.
• EACH CHILD HAS TO TAKE THE SAME TEST, GRADES 3-8 & HS
-- An 11th grade cohort was chosen to maximize instructional time in
high school in response to AYP targets. (The ELA and Mathematics
intended cohort in 2005 was actually grade 10.)
-- OTL began as a policy to align test administration with instruction
during grades 9, 10, and 11; a double-testing option was added in
response to the AYP mandate to make all students proficient by 2014.
-- Emphasis was placed on monitoring “Optional,” “Priority,” and
“Complete” students for building-level AYP determinations.
-- Some schools tested 9th graders to determine or “diagnose” those
who were proficient and whose scores could be “banked” toward
making AYP.
-- The OTL policy created a three-year footprint comprised of formative
assessments, interim assessments, double-testing, banking scores,
and monitoring individual student assessment histories while at the
same time recognizing only proficient scores for AYP.
14