Transcript July 26, 2012     To move away from the narrowly defined accountability system in NCLB To have a new accountability system that uses multiple.

July 26, 2012
1




To move away from the narrowly defined
accountability system in NCLB
To have a new accountability system that
uses multiple measures with goals that are
unique to each school/district
To have results which are more meaningful
measures of the success and progress of
Kansas schools
KS is already doing many of the parts, i.e.
common core standards
2





No more AYP beginning with 2013
assessments
No more 100% proficient by 2014
No more Title I schools or districts on
improvement
No more required Title I school choice or
supplemental educational services (SES—after
school tutoring)
No more Highly Qualified Teacher (HQT)
Improvement Plans
3
1.
2.
3.
College- and Career-Ready Expectations for
All Students
State-Developed Differentiated Recognition,
Accountability, and Support
Supporting Effective Instruction and
Leadership
4
New AYP Goals: Mathematics
K-8 math
9-12 math
100.0
95.6
100
86.7
90
77.8
88.2
73.4
82.3
66.8
70
60.1
60
76.4
60.1
70.5
64.6
53.5
46.8
100
94.1
82.3
80
50
91.1
46.8
55.7
40
46.8
46.8
2005
2006
38.0
30
29.1
29.1
2002
2003
20
10
0
2004
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
5
6
7
% Proficient—Old System (AYP)
100
90
92.7
93.5
93.6
90.9
80
70
% Proficient
60
50
40
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
8
Assessment Performance Index (API)
750
745
748
744
740
735
API
730
729
725
727
720
715
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
9



Affect of waiver on 2013 QPA still under
development
2012 was last “AYP” for QPA
2013 possibly use new annual measurable
objectives (AMOs) to measure student
performance (“P” in QPA)
10
11
12