Transcript Project Approval

Intelection
Presentation IV:
Project Approval
Jeremy Williams
Matthew Jackson
Adrian Carr
Jeff Woltz
Paul Tuason
Andy Niepraschk
Overview
 Too many votes are lost


Disenfranchised voters
Ballot Disputes
 Intelection solves election woes



Automated ID Check
Touch-screen Interface
Compatible with Current Technology
Introduction
 Feasibility
 Design
 Risks/Mitigation




Organization
Budget
Schedule
Resources
Feasibility
 “History of Election is 200 year history of
corruption”
--Quote from Dr. Charles Overstreet, ODU
 33% believe cheating occurred
 33% believe they could have cheated!
-- Survey results from survey of 200 ODU Students
What we are solving
 Cheating
 Ambiguity


Voter Understanding
Voter Intent
 Streamlining the Process
Functional Overview
Design
 Touch-Screen Interface
 Faster, More Accurate in
Identifying
 Non-perforated ballots, for
easy understanding
 Modular design for easy
upgrades
Certification
 Varies from state to state
 18-24 Month period
 3 phases



Arbitration
Hardware testing
Legal testing
Risks
 Certification
 Electrical outages
 Durability
 State election laws
Risk Mitigation
 Marketing research during development
 Power protection system for outages
 Design by ASE Engineers
 Legal team works hand-in-hand with State
Boards of Election
Competition
Our Product
Internet
Voting
Accuvote- Current
TS
System
iVote
Sequoia
Allows Hand
Recounts
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Touchscreen
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Chads
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Voter Privacy
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
ID Check
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
*****
*
*
****
***
**
Protection from
Cheating
Main Competitors
 Accuvote

No paper trail for recounts
 Current System


Too reliant on human intervention
Already considered broken by public
 Internet Voting

No privacy guarantee
Organization
Jeremy Williams
Intelection
Andrew
Niepraschk
Paul Tuason
Adrian Carr
Jeff Woltz
Engineering
Software
Quality
Assurance
Matthew
Jackson
Marketing
Schedule
 1 year -- end of product development
 2.5 year -- first certification
 3.5 year -- break-even
 5 year -- recoup costs
 12 year -- $20 billion???
Expenses
40000000
Profit
35000000
30000000
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Market Analysis
 $40+ billion market
 Prioritize by state-wide demand
 Cater to each county individually
Budget
 $13 million investment necessary
 First-year costs -- $2.68 million
 proceeding years -- $2.63 million
 enter into a $40+ billion market
Resources
Contracts


Legal firm
Equipment Manufacturer
Personnel


Most important resource
Most budget allowance
Conclusion
 Demand exists for a reliable, trustworthy
product
 Intelection fills holes left by competitors
 Business model is realistic and attainable
 Ready to begin making money for investors
Questions?