Meaningful Observation of Electronic Voting Processes Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and.
Download ReportTranscript Meaningful Observation of Electronic Voting Processes Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and.
Meaningful Observation of Electronic Voting Processes Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Issues to be addressed when observing electronic voting • The background leading to the decision for electronic voting and comparison with the system being replaced • the legal framework • certification and testing of the system • secrecy of the ballot • security of the entire system and its functioning • voter accessibility and education • election administration and training of polling station officials in operating the voting system • Voter-verified paper record • recounts and challenges to results • overall transparency and public confidence • accountability Minimum requirements for an electronic voting system • • • • • • • • • • Inclusive and transparent certification of the electronic voting system by a qualified independent body The comprehensive testing of the system Access for individuals or groups specifically identified in election legislation, such as academic institutions or civil society groups, to conduct comprehensive and periodic reviews. Access for international observers to the results of the certification process Secrecy of the ballot must be guaranteed Security requirements that apply at each level of the system and ensure transparency and accountability The electronic voting system must produce a voter verifiable paper record Amendment of the legal framework to adequately provide for sufficient transparency, mandatory audits, possibility for recounts, and legal challenges to election results under the new electronic voting system Regulations to prevent possible conflicts of interests of vendors, certification agencies and election officials, including a strict code of ethics to prevent the appearance of partisan activity and the acceptance of anything of monetary value between vendors and officials involved in the procurement, administration, and oversight of election systems Establishment of a clear division of responsibilities between vendors, certification agencies and election administrators to fully ensure accountability and an effective response in the case of system failure.