Transcript Transition to Operations

Transition to Operations
John Arthur
LCLS
From construction project to operating facility
Structure of the LCLS facility organization
Operations and the experiment program
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 1
John Arthur
[email protected]
Steps in turning on the LCLS
Timeline
Accelerator commissioning
X-ray commissioning
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 2
John Arthur
[email protected]
First Light
in FEH
CD-4 (7/31/2010)
FEH Install
First Light
in FEE
X-Rays in NEH
FEH Hutch BO
PPS Cert. LTU/Dump
FEE/NEH Install
now
LTU/Und/Dump Install
PEP-II run ends
LCLS Installation and Commissioning
PPS
J F M AM J J A S ON D J F MAM
AM J J A S ON D J F M A M J J
Down
2008
2009
2010
Linac/BC2
Commissioning
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 3
Re-commission
Inj/BC2 to SL2
LTU/Und
Comm.
FEE
Comm.
AMO
Experiment
program
begins
John Arthur
[email protected]
Accelerator Commissioning
Ground rules for transfer of new accelerator systems from
construction to Accelerator Systems Div were defined in Lab
Director’s memo, 12/2006
ASD SOP for control of accelerator configuration implemented
from start of commissioning
Staged handover of new systems
Injector + BC-1
Commissioning: April 2007 start, November 2007 finish
+ Linac through Sector 30
Commissioning: January 2008 start, April 2008 finish
+ Beam Transport through Undulator and Beam Dump
January 2009 start, July 2009 finish
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 4
John Arthur
[email protected]
X-Ray Commissioning
Front End start commissioning
May 2009
Near Hall start commissioning
July 2009
Far Hall start commissioning
February 2010
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 5
John Arthur
[email protected]
Organization
LCLS Directorate within SLAC
Structure of the LCLS Directorate
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 6
John Arthur
[email protected]
SLAC Organization
SLAC Director
P. Drell
LCLS
Photon Science
D. Knutson
K. Hodgson
Operations
A. Merola
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 7
SSRL
J. Stöhr
Particle Physics &
Astrophysics
S. Kahn
Engineering &
Technical Support
L. Klaisner
John Arthur
[email protected]
LCLS Directorate Organization
LCLS Director
Dale Knutson
Accelerator
Systems Div
Experimental
Facilities Div
John Seeman
Business Div
Cindy Lowe
Jochen Schneider
Engineering
Physics Div
David Schultz
Strategic
Projects Div
John Galayda
LCLS
Construction
LUSI
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 8
John Arthur
[email protected]
Operations
Budgets
Staffing plans
Operation goals
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 9
John Arthur
[email protected]
LCLS Proposed Budget
Accelerator Systems
FY2009: $ 96.7M
(similar to FY08)
Experiment Facilities
FY2009: $ 2M
FY2010: $ 9M
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 10
(new money)
John Arthur
[email protected]
Equipment/CEP
GPP
LCLS [Direct](2)
$
2 $
1,100
1,800
Accelerator Systems Budget
Linac [Direct]
153 $
19,695
PEP-II [Direct]
112 $
$
16,039
14,021
Power (1)
Direct Program Support [Direct](3)
(4)
Lab wide Indirects
Linac
TWG RollUp_Level
2
TWG RollUp_Level 1
Linac
Related
Ops Ops Total AIP
Linac
Related
Equipment/CEP
PPA Programs [Direct]
GPP
PSD Programs [Direct]
LCLS [Direct](2)
LCLS 2nd Undulator [Direct]
LCLS Const'n/2nd Undulator
Linac [Direct]
PEP-II [Direct]
LCLS Construction [Direct]
(1)
Power
LCLS Const'n/2nd Undulator
Total
Other DOE Funding [Direct] Direct Program Support [Direct](3)
(4)
Lab wide Indirects
Total
budget
DOE
Linac
Related
Ops-Total
PPANotes:
Programs [Direct]
(4)
Lab wide Indirects Linac
FTE
2006
Labor, Shop
97 &$
M&S (FY06
K$)89 $
17 $
5,502$
472
$
1,100
420
2 $
1,800$
$
6 $
3,500
4,500
112
$
19,183
114
$
15,642
$
8,975
2009
Labor,
Shop
11,546
105&
M&S (FY06
15,795
FTE
K$) 79
22 $
5,974
85,497
438
$
3,500
62,943
595
6 $
4,500
&
$Labor, Shop
13,817
M&S (FY09
K$)14,395
$$
6,720
85,986
$
3,937
96,356
$$
5,062
$
193 $
31,785
112
$
487
19,183
$$
87,091
21,578
153
$
19,695
114
$
60
15,642
$$
18,605
17,596
112
$
$
$
68,395
$
68,395
105
$
7,499
13
8,975
73
13,817
25
$
$
97
16,039$
169
14,021$
169
11,546
16 $
$
6,977
10,096
25,582
15,542
10,911
89
$
$
49,049
16,192
$
37,282
79 $
293,401
438 $
321
14,395
472
257
15,795$
1,527
85,497$
1,940
85,986
$$
354,975
96,722
420
$
62,943
96,356
$
595
$
108,388
PSD(1)Programs
193by $2.2
$ million
31,785
$ Rate87,091
$ Credit.
97,966
The FY06
total SLAC power cost is estimated to be $17.4 million which is lower
because of a487
one-time
Adjustment
[Direct]
The FY09 total
SLAC powerLCLS
cost is2nd
estimated
to be[Direct]
$17.5 million in FY06 dollars.
Undulator
LCLS Const'n/2nd
Undulator
60 $
18,605 $
20,928
(2) Lines labeled (Direct) represent direct costs only without any allocated indirect costs.
LCLS Construction [Direct]
169 $
68,395
13 $
6,977
(3) Costs incurred to benefit a wide range of programs/activities.
These costs are not associated with a single program/activity.
LCLS
Undulator
Total with any particular activity and benefit the entire169
$
68,395
73 $
25,582
(4) Const'n/2nd
Costs that cannot
be identified
laboratory.
Other DOE Funding [Direct]
(4)
Lab wide Indirects
Total budget - DOE
16
$
7,499
25
$
10,911
$
$
$
257
1,527
$
$
37,282
293,401
321
1,940
$
$
49,049
354,975
$
$
7,848
28,776
12,273
55,174
399,298
Notes:
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
John Arthur
(1)
The FY06 to
total
SLAC powerp.cost
Transition
Operations
11 is estimated to be $17.4 million which is lower by $2.2 million because of a one-time Rate Adjustment Credit.
[email protected]
Photon Operations Staffing
FY09
FY10
Long term
Instrument scientists
1
4.5
24
Engineering (laser, mech, elec)
2
6
30
Development scientists
1.5
3
10
Detectors
0.5
2
3
Computer applications
2
5
12
Technicians
1
4
34
Admin
1
5
11
Totals
9
29.5
124
(FTE)
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 12
John Arthur
[email protected]
Target Running Schedule
(hours of operation)
2009: AMO, SXR
2010: AMO, SXR, XPP
2011: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI
2012: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI, XCS
HED?
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 13
John Arthur
[email protected]
LCLS Facility in its Science Context
Advisory groups
User outreach
Access policy
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 14
John Arthur
[email protected]
LCLS Science Advisory Committee
Roger Falcone
Massimo Altarelli
Phil Bucksbaum
Robert L. Byer
Hans Frauenfelder
Wayne Hendrickson
Tetsuya Ishikawa
Margaret Murnane
Francesco Sette
Sunil Sinha
Dietrich von der Linde
Justin Wark
C. Lewis Cocke
Robert Schoenlein
Philip Anfinrud
Geraldine Richmond
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 15
UC Berkeley, USA - Chair
European XFEL Project
Stanford University
Stanford University
LANL
Columbia University
RIKEN Spring-8 Center
University of Colorado-Boulder
ESRF
UCSD
University of Essen
Oxford University
Kansas State University
LBNL
NIH
University of Oregon
John Arthur
[email protected]
LCLS/LUSI Instrument Teams
SAC recommended scientific thrust areas, based on letters of
intent to do LCLS science (250 signatories)
Thrust areas: AMO, XPP, CXI, HED, XCS, SXR
Scientists chose team leaders for each area
Interface with SLAC
Provide input to instrument design process
Instrument scientists in regular contact with team leaders
Team leaders review and accept instrument physics
requirement documents
Workshops have brought many team members to SLAC
LCLS encourages instrument team presence from start of
instrument operation
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 16
John Arthur
[email protected]
Instrument Team Leaders (LUSI)
XPP (Instrument scientist: David Fritz)
K. Gaffney (SLAC, leader)
D. Reis (U. of MI)
T. Tschentscher (DESY)
J. Larsson (Lund Inst Tech)
CXI (Instrument scientist: Sebastien Boutet)
J. Hajdu (SLAC + Uppsala U, leader)
H. Chapman (DESY)
J. Miao (UCLA)
XCS (Instrument scientist: Aymeric Robert)
B. Stephenson (ANL, leader)
K. Ludwig (Boston U)
G. Grübel, DESY
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 17
John Arthur
[email protected]
Instrument Team Leaders (non-LUSI)
AMO (Instrument scientist: John Bozek)
L. Di Mauro (Ohio State, leader)
N. Berrah (Western Michigan U)
SXR (Instrument scientist TBD)
A. Nilsson (Stanford)
W. Wurth (U Hamburg)
HED (Instrument scientist TBD)
R. Lee (LLNL, leader)
P. Heimann (LBNL)
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 18
John Arthur
[email protected]
Outreach: Web (LCLS.slac.stanford.edu)
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 19
John Arthur
[email protected]
Information on LCLS instruments
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 20
John Arthur
[email protected]
User site (LCLS.slac.stanford.edu/USER/)
“Proposals for experiments
using the AMO station must
be submitted by September
1, 2008.”
“During 2010 it is anticipated
that the spectral range of the
LCLS will be extended to 8
keV. A call for proposals for
XPP will be issued in early
2009.”
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 21
John Arthur
[email protected]
LCLS Users Organization
First met at 2007 LCLS Users Meeting
Elected an Executive Committee
A. Barty (LLNL)
R. Lee (LLNL)
L. Young (ANL)
First task: create charter
Draft in circulation
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 22
John Arthur
[email protected]
2008 LCLS/SSRL Users Meeting
Oct 15-18, 2008
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 23
John Arthur
[email protected]
User Access Policy
All instruments are managed by LCLS
Every experiment starts with a proposal
Beam time allocated primarily on scientific merit
Some time reserved for instrumentation proposals
Small fraction reserved for Director’s discretion & in-house research
Special, limited-time arrangements of preference for LCLS/LUSI
instrument team
Groups making significant additions of general utility to LCLS can
negotiate limited-time preference
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 24
John Arthur
[email protected]
Summary
LCLS operations organization is taking shape
User outreach is progressing well
User policy encourages and supports widespread accessibility
LCLS is open for business
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 25
John Arthur
[email protected]
End of Presentation
LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008
Transition to Operations p. 26
John Arthur
[email protected]