Open Practices for the Connected Researcher Open Practices for the Connected Researcher Presentation by by Brian Brian Kelly, Kelly, UKOLN UKOLN on on23 25October October2012 2012for Presentation for Open an Open Access Week event at University the University of Exeter an Access Week event at the of.
Download ReportTranscript Open Practices for the Connected Researcher Open Practices for the Connected Researcher Presentation by by Brian Brian Kelly, Kelly, UKOLN UKOLN on on23 25October October2012 2012for Presentation for Open an Open Access Week event at University the University of Exeter an Access Week event at the of.
Open Practices for the Connected Researcher Open Practices for the Connected Researcher Presentation by by Brian Brian Kelly, Kelly, UKOLN UKOLN on on23 25October October2012 2012for Presentation for Open an Open Access Week event at University the University of Exeter an Access Week event at the of Exeter 1 Twitter: #OAweek http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/seminars/exeter-open-access-week-2012/ Open Practices for the Connected Researcher Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath, UK Acceptable Use Policy Recording this talk, taking photos, having discussions using Twitter, etc. is encouraged - but try to keep distractions to others minimised. Blog: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/ Twitter: @briankelly / @ukwebfocus UKOLN is supported by: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 licence (but note caveat) Idea from Cameron Neylon You are free to: copy, share, adapt, or re-mix; photograph, film, or broadcast; blog, live-blog, or post video of this presentation provided that: You attribute the work to its author and respect the rights and licences associated with its components. 3 Slide Concept by Cameron Neylon, who has waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights. This slide only CCZero. Social Media Icons adapted with permission from originals by Christopher Ross. Original images are available under GPL at: http://www.thisismyurl.com/free-downloads/15-free-speech-bubble-icons-for-popular-websites Introduction 4 About Me Brian Kelly: • UK Web Focus: national advisory post to UK HEIs • Long-standing Web evangelist • Based at UKOLN at the University of Bath • Prolific blogger (1,140+ posts since Nov 2006) • User of various devices to support professional (and social) activities • Prolific speaker (~400 talks from 1996-2012) • Member of UKOLN’s Innovation Support Centre ISC at UKOLN: • Supporting innovation across higher & further education • Funded by JISC Introduction About This Talk Open access: • Benefits for researchers understood • Arguments will continue This seminar goes beyond open access: • Open practices: sharing ideas on blogs • Open engagement: the role of Twitter • Dissemination: getting your research read • Gathering the evidence: social media metrics • Making it work: identifying best practices This talk provides 12 tips for the connected researcher Based on evidence gained from personal experiences 5 About You Are you a Roundhead or a Cavalier? “In the century, Britain was devastated by a civil war that divided the nation into two tribes – the Roundheads and the Cavaliers. The Cavaliers represent a Britain of panache, pleasure and individuality. They are confronted by the Roundheads, who stand for modesty, discipline, equality and state intervention.” Who do you admire most? • Mo Farrah for winning the 5,000 and 10,000m? • Usain Bolt for partying with Swedish handball team after winning 100m, & before 200m & relay? 6 Introduction Are You A Marxist? “Hitherto, philosophers have sought to understand the world; the point, however, is to change it” Do you seek to change the world through your research or simply understand the world: • Will you want to market your research? • Will you want others to market your research? • Will you have a detached view of your research? 7 My Papers My papers in the University of Bath Opus repository 8 Open Access enhances access Largets downloads 9 Least Downloaded Papers 18 Oct 2012 10 Will papers in a repository be seldom seen? What can be learn from approaches taken for the popular and unpopular papers? Learning from Mistakes “Using context to support effective application of web content accessibility guidelines” • Submitted in July 2005 • Reviewers comments received in April 2006 • Published in JWE in December 2006 • PDF uploaded to repository in May 2012 • Forgotten paper Reflections on implications when bulk uploads given in “If a Tree Falls in a made Forest” post 11 Learning From Success “Library 2.0: balancing the risks and benefits to maximise the dividends” • Sixth most downloaded paper in repository • But only recent download statistics available 2012 12 Reasons For Paper’s Popularity Possible reasons • • • • Quality of paper Quality of metadata Importance of co-authors Provision of full-text, rather than just metadata • Formats used (HTML as well as PDFs) • Role of social media • Other suggestions? 13 Evidence How do we find out more? • Peak statistics for repository only available for 1 year But: • Blog post about availability in Opus published on 11 August 2009 Further investigation (of all my paper downloads) confirms large peak in August 2009 Conclusion: Blog post responsible for initial popularity 14 Beyond the Edge Cases Little-downloaded paper: • Uploaded to repository 6 years after paper written • I was not lead author • Only PDF version uploaded • Never blogged about; never tweeted Most popular paper: • Available in IR on launch of journal issue • I was lead author • MS Word, PDF & HTML versions uploaded • Blog post published on day of launch • Link to paper subsequently tweeted & retweeted • About Web 2.0, so likely to be read by bloggers But what about the majority of papers? 15 SEO or SMO SEO: Helping Google find your papers through: • Writing style, document structure, … • In-bound links SMO: Helping other people find your papers through: • Viral marketing • Engaging with one’s peers • Sharing on social media services SMO: Good for new papers, but not relevant for popular papers written from 2004-8 SEO: Document structure consistent. Difference appears to be significant nos. of in-bound links 16 Tip No. 1: Be Pro-active Tip No. 1: Be pro-active 17 W4A 2012 Paper 18 Case study: • Paper on “A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: putting people and processes first” given at W4A 2012 conference in Lyon in Apr 2012 Four co-authors agreed: • To collaborate in raising awareness of paper and presentation of the paper How: • Writing blog posts on or just before conference • To participate in Twitter (e.g. responding to comments while speaker is presenting paper) Benefits: • Reaching out to a wider audience based on our 4 professional networks Preparation We: • Uploaded paper to repository so URL was known • Provided a link to the paper in speaker’s slides • Uploaded holding slide to Slideshare so URL was known (slides were finalised shortly before talk) We could then: • Prepare blog posts in advance • Create short URLs in advance Examples of approaches to follow 19 Tip No. 2: Identify Key Channels Tip No. 2: Identify the key channels 20 Opus Repository Paper uploaded to Opus repository 21 http://opus.bath.ac.uk/29190/ http://www.slideshare.net/sloandr/w4a12-coopersloankellylewthwaite 22 Metadata provided to give context to slides Final slide provides (active) links to related work 23 Tip No. 3: Monitor What Works Tip No. 3: Monitor what works (for you) 24 Capture Statistics On 18 Apr 12: • 1,391 views on Slideshare • Other slides had 3 and 311 views By 18 Oct 12: • 7,209 views on Slideshare “Lies, damned lies & statistics” – but my most downloaded paper in 2012 25 Topsy and Event Hashtag Buzz around event hashtag captured by Topsy 26 Topsy & Discussion About Slides Topsy recorded discussions about slides 27 Topsy & Discussion About Paper Topsy recorded discussions about paper Note tweets about event (25) and slides (20) more popular than paper (7) 28 Repository Statistics Opus repository stats: • Views began in March (before conference). Publish on embargo date didn’t work! • Largest downloads took place on 7 March, day blog post published 29 • Post about collaborative tools for writing paper, not Other Repositories 30 In some disciplines other repositories may be popular “palaeontologists for some reason very much like Academia.edu. Perhaps your research communities centre around IRs this will vary from discipline to discipline” Ross Mounce, Palaeontologist @ Bath Tip No. 4: Don’t Forget the Links! Tip No. 4: Don’t forget the links 31 LinkedIn Links to paper added to • • • • 32 LinkedIn Academia.edu My pages on UKOLN Web site and blog … Academia.edu Academia.edu Note: • Links to papers in IR (not uploaded) 33 • Importance of tags Academia.edu users may find my papers here and LinkedIn users in LinkedIn. Why would I make it difficult for them? The IR Your papers should be hosted on your institutional repository 34 The Institutional Web Site You may also wish to provide links on your institutional Web site Note direct links to paper in various formats 35 The Institutional CRIS Your papers may also be listed on the institutional CRIS 36 The Blog If you have a blog you can provide links to your papers (again to all formats) 37 Commentable Pages on Blog Recent development: Commentable pages for papers with links to key resources (IR & publisher’s copy, metrics, citations, …) 38 Tip No. 5: Don’t Forget the Google Juice! Tip No. 5: Don’t forget the Google juice! 39 Importance of Google Context: • Between 50-80% of traffic to IRs are from Google (may be higher if direct links to PDFs not recorded by Google Analytics) What provides ‘Google juice’: • On-page SEO techniques (structure, writing style, …) • Links to pages, especially from highly-ranking sites 40 Importance of Google Context: • Between 50-80% of traffic to IRs are from Google (may be higher if direct links to PDFs not recorded by Google Analytics) What provides ‘Google juice’: • On-page SEO techniques (structure, writing style, …) • Links to pages, especially from highly-ranking sites What’s different about IRs? • Same page structure • Therefore importance of links to repository 41 Importance of Google Context: • Between 50-80% of traffic to IRs are from Google (may be higher if direct links to PDFs not recorded by Google Analytics) What provides ‘Google juice’: • On-page SEO techniques (structure, writing style, …) • Links to pages, especially from highly-ranking sites What’s different about IRs? • Same page structure • Therefore importance of links to repository 42 What Delivers Google Juice? Survey of SEO ranking of 24 Russell Group IRs carried out in August 2012. Findings: • Google, YouTube, Blogspot, Wikipedia and Microsoft are highest ranking domains with links to IRs Blogspot.com Wordpress.com 43 • Blogspot.com & WordPress.com have significantly larger number of links to IRs • Links from institutional domain (e.g. locally-hosted blogs) provide little Google juice! UK Web Focus blog has links to papers 44 45 UK Web Focus blog has a rotating Featured Paper link UK Web Focus blog has a rotating Featured Paper with links to funders & organisation on all pages >46 5,000? But Isn’t Google Clever? Google will address cheats aimed at artificially boosting search results (“black hat SEO”) But: • This approach is “white hat SEO” • SEO analysis of Bath IR shows top 5 highly ranked page are to my papers 2 Accessibility 2.0: next steps for web accessibility, 2009. 5 citations 3 Can LinkedIn and Academia.edu Enhance Access to Open Repositories?, 2012 5 Open Metrics for Open Repositories, 2012 Evidence: • Largest number of downloads in IR • Largest number of links from highly-ranked trusted domains Success in dissemination. Need to correlate with nos. of citations 47 Google Scholar Citations Most cited papers according to Google Scholar Citations Downloads (IR) Nos. Current Graph 275 169 244 48 Tip No. 6: Encourage Feedback Tip No. 6: Encourage feedback and discussion 49 Comments On Your Blog A blog post about a paper provides opportunity for feedback & discussion Feedback on an embarrassing typo! Legitimate question about research assumptions 50 Blog Comments Increasing tendency for discussion and comments to be distributed (e.g. on other people’s blogs or on Twitter) Some topics do attract large numbers of comments (evidence-based surveys in my case). 51 Distributed Discussions Comments may take place on other blogs. You should allow trackbacks so you see links to your posts You can see links from blogs which reference yours. You can see links from other services which reference yours. You can see the chain if you refer to previous posts in your blog. 52 Referring Blog Post Citation, but no additional comment 53 Scoop.it Scoop.it 54 Scoop.it Seeing no. of links from Scoop.it growing Implications: • Others highlighting your ideas • Scoop.it giving your Google juice • Helping you to grow your network This is of interest to me. I must follow the Dual Impact Scoop.it account 55 Tip No. 7: Develop Your Network Tip No. 7: Develop your network 56 “It’s About Nodes and Connections” Cameron Neylon keynote at OR 2012: “Networks qualitatively change our capacity” • With only 20% of a community connected only limited interaction can take place • This increases drastically as numbers of connected nodes grows Examples: • Phone networks (no use with only 1 user!) • Tweeting at this seminar • Galaxy Zoo “Filters block. Filters cause friction” Need for client-side, not supply-side filters. 57 Tweetchat Tweetchats: • Discussions on Twitter • Specific topic covered at specified time • Use hashtags e.g. #PhDchat, #ECRchat Summary at Survey findings: “give a community & shared space to explore ideas” “regular opportunity to network with a wide range of people I wouldn’t otherwise meet” “have very interesting and thought-provoking discussions/debate” 58 Tip No. 8: Understand Your Network Tip No. 8: Understand your network 59 Social Bros 60 SocialBro: people in my network typically follow 100-500 Twitter users Social Bros 61 SocialBro: people in my network typically tweet 2-5 times every day Traffic To My Blog People arrive at the UK Web Focus blog via: • Google • Twitter Web site (nb client visits not included) • Facebook! 62 Tip No. 9: Know Your Limits Tip No. 9: Know when to say “No!” 63 It May Not Be For You Your working style; your discipline • “The Social Web & the Belbin Model” post suggested “Plants” & “Resource investigators” may find Social Web fits their working style • You may have concerns about privacy • You may work in different area of research with different practices; … Your time: • “Blogs, Twitter, LinkedIn, Academia.edu, scoop.it, bit.ly, YouTube… - I haven’t got the time!” • Need to prioritise, based on awareness of possibilities, relevance, … • But remember there can be light-weight approaches you can use 64 Tip No. 10: Seek Improvement Tip No. 10: Seek gradual improvement 65 Use of Slideshare Improvements for next time. 66 Use of Slideshare Improvements for next time. 67 Tip No. 11: Be Ethical Tip No. 11: Be ethical 68 Fake Reviews Don’t be tempted to create a “sock puppet”: an online identity used for purposes of deception. Note technological developments are likely to spot fraud / inappropriate patterns of use. 69 Personal Statement First public draft of a personal approach to use of social media to support my research based on my working practices: • I will promote my research in order to maximise awareness and take-up of ideas • I will use social media to support this objective • I will regard outputs which do not have a sufficiently large audience as a failing • I will not use fake accounts to promote my work • I will be aware of potential concerns regarding spamming • I will gather evidence of the effectiveness of my use of social media 70 Tip No. 12: Participate Tip No. 12: Participate! 71 Participate! Participate 72 Health Warning! Suggestions given can help to enhance the visibility of one’s research. Highly visible and popular research is not necessarily an indication of quality! 73 Conclusions 1 Be pro-active 2 Identify the key channels 3 Monitor what works for you 4 Don’t forget the links 5 Don’t forget the Google juice 6 Encourage feedback and discussion 7 Develop your network 8 Understand your network 9 Know your limits 10 Seek improvements 11 Be ethical 12 Participate 74 Questions Any questions or comments? 75