Critical Thinking Chapter 21 Meg Lipper Caldwell College OVERVIEW • Introduction • Casual Thinking VS Critical Thinking • Critical Thinking in Action • Facilitated Communication • Critical Thinking in the Workplace • Summary • Questions / Comments.
Download ReportTranscript Critical Thinking Chapter 21 Meg Lipper Caldwell College OVERVIEW • Introduction • Casual Thinking VS Critical Thinking • Critical Thinking in Action • Facilitated Communication • Critical Thinking in the Workplace • Summary • Questions / Comments.
Critical Thinking Chapter 21 Meg Lipper Caldwell College OVERVIEW • Introduction • Casual Thinking VS Critical Thinking • Critical Thinking in Action • Facilitated Communication • Critical Thinking in the Workplace • Summary • Questions / Comments “What skeptical thinking boils down to is the means to construct, and to understand, a reasoned argument and – especially important – to recognize a fallacious or fraudulent argument.” Bailey & Burch, 2010 Miraculous Breakthrough! • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh3QfFP_yCM • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rucaw44cWJY • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAzMiyTonRM Introduction • Personal Anecdotes don’t cut it! • We are ALWAYS questioning Everything Everyone • Not interested in correlational findings • We want to see the data! Bailey & Burch, 2010 Show Me the DATA! • Repeated measures • Observational • Social reliability validity • Experimental • MUST control be Socially Significant! Bailey & Burch, 2010 What it Looks Like… Casual Vs Critical Thinking • Casual thinking = Problem solving “Its time for an oil change. I pass a Jiffy Lube on my way home from work every afternoon, so I guess I’ll stop and have it done today.” “I want you to try this Fair Trade Organic Sumatran Reserve coffee. It has the most amazing flavor and is grown in soil that has never been treated with pesticides, so you won’t get cancer from it.” Bailey & Burch, 2010 Critical Thinking in Action Information Inference Implication (Data) (Conclusion) (Consequence) Assumptions Bailey & Burch, 2010 Dangers of Casual Thinking “Families desperate for any shred of hope for a cure for autism seem disinclined t engage in critical thinking about treatment effectiveness.” • Waste of time, money, & resources • Might not work • May cause more harm Bailey & Burch, 2010 Baseline Sensory Integration Toys + DRO+ Response Follow – up Interrupt Be Aware of Fad Treatments Facilitated Communication: The Poster Child for Failed Critical Thinking • Began in Australia, migrated to US in the early 1990’s • Facilitators assist individuals in typing on a keyboard • Due to desperation and gullible consumers Hired in school systems • Turns out…. Facilitators were writing the stories Diagnosed individuals being facilitated were not even engaged “The consequences have been devastating for families that were ripped apart by fallacious allegations.” Bailey & Burch, 2010 Critical Thinking in the Workplace • As Behavior Analysts Critical thinking tools are essential Remain Calm Review the evidence Determine assumptions that have been made Don’t believe the first story Establish baseline before drawing conclusions • Teachers, parents, & administrators Horrendous situations Require immediate attention Most likely a thirdhand story Bailey & Burch, 2010 Who Are We Up Against?? • Colleagues from other professions Advocate their favorite interventions Occupational therapists Speech & Language pathologists • Parents Strange new fads Internet Other parents Catelogs • Administrators • Cut costs Cut down hours of treatment Hire individuals without proper training Bailey & Burch, 2010 Summary • Stay updated on current literature! • Don’t believe the first story; Listen to ALL sides • Ask questions • Collect data directly • Analyze the evidence • Combine your critical thinking skills with other topics discussed in the text: Assertiveness Ethics in daily life Persuasion Lobbying Handling difficult people Problem solving Bailey & Burch, 2010 Additional Readings • Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. • Bundy, A. C., & Murray, E. A. (2002). Assessing sensory integrative dysfunction. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane, & A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp.3-34). Philadelphia: Davis. • Foxx, R. M. (1994, Fall). Facilitated communication in Pennsylvania: Scientifically invalid but politically correct. Dimensions, 1-9. • Jacobson, J. W., Foxx, R. M., & Mulick, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. • Mason, S. A., & Iwata, B. A. (1990). Artificial effects of sensory-integrative therapy on self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 361-370. • Normand, M. T., & Bailey, J. S. (2006). The effects of celebration lines on accurate data analysis. Behavior Modification, 30, 295-314. • Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. (2002). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education • Smith, T., Mruzek, D. W., & Mozingo, D. (2005). Sensory integrative therapy. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. • Zechmeister, E. B., & Johnson, J. E. (1992). Critical thinking: A functional approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Bailey & Burch, 2010 References • Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2010). 25 essential skills and strategies for the professional behavior analyst. New York, NY: Routledge