FIRE SPREAD IN BUILDINGS URBAN FIRE FORUM Robert James Regulatory Services May 23, 2012 © 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Download ReportTranscript FIRE SPREAD IN BUILDINGS URBAN FIRE FORUM Robert James Regulatory Services May 23, 2012 © 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
FIRE SPREAD IN BUILDINGS URBAN FIRE FORUM Robert James Regulatory Services May 23, 2012 © 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Size Up and Tactics ??? Design of Newer Homes Larger Homes Average Square Footage of New Single-Family Homes 2,700 26% of Houses built in 2008 were greater than 3000 ft2 2,500 2,300 2,100 1,900 1,700 1,500 1972 1978 1984 1990 1996 2002 2008 Source: http://www.census.gov Larger Homes Percent of Total Number of Home Levels 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1970 1-Story 2-Story 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: http://www.census.gov Open Spaces Open Spaces Open Floor Plans Great Rooms 9-14 ft Ceilings Open Foyers All of these features add volume/air which allows the fire to grow and smoke to spread. Increased Fuel Loads • Upholstered furniture such as chairs, recliners, love seats and sofas are common fuel packages in the living room or family room of a residential occupancy. • A single upholstered chair can provide enough energy to take a 10′ x 12′ room to flashover. • A sofa can provide 3X the energy of a single chair. Increased Fuel Loads - Experiment Modern Room Legacy Room Increased Fuel Loads - Experiment Modern Room Legacy Room 11 Increased Fuel Loads - Occupants Times to escape safely have been reduced greatly. • NIST Study “Escape times in this study were systematically shorter than those found in a similar study conducted in the 1970's. “ • This is due mainly to faster fire development times due to modern furniture. • Standards to improve the fire hazard posed by furniture are not widely adopted in the US. Mattresses are an exception to this post 2005. Increased Fuel Loads – Fire fighters Legacy Modern Changing Building Materials - Linings • The wall lining can play an important roll in the transition from a room fire to a structure fire. • Fire training buildings are constructed with concrete walls so that they can have repeated fires. Open Void Spaces – Attic Voids If you can think it – it can be designed. House geometries are limitless. Changing Building Materials - Doors • Interior doors have been made lighter and use less material. • If a fire in a closed room does not run out of air and extinguish; then it can burn through a door and extend to the rest of the house. • Many new doors are hollow and filled with cardboard spacers or are molded of wood particles Changing Building Materials - Windows • Windows have become more energy efficient by adding glazing and coatings. • The easier windows fail due to heat exposure the more air available to feed a fire. The other changes such as to the fuel load make this important. Current UL research project aims to examine this with DHS AFG funding. Changing Building Materials Home Sheathing: Solid Boards → Plywood → OSB → Asphalt Fiberboard → Cardboard Wall Linings: Plaster and lath → Gypsum Board Structural Components: Old Growth Lumber → New Growth Lumber → Engineered Lumber Windows: Single Glazed → Double Glazed → Wood Framed → Vinyl Framed Doors: Solid Core → Hollow Core → Composite Doors Evolutions in building materials create changes in the fire environment. How all of these changes compound is not well understood. Changing Building Materials - Sheathing Recently, serious fires in the US have been the result of fires starting on the outside of the structure and spreading to the inside. Virginia – 1FF LODD Loudon County, VA – May 25th 2008 – 1FF LODD Changing Building Materials - Sheathing Sources/Causes: • Another structure • Smoking materials • Mulch • Grilling • Others Structural Stability of Engineered Lumber in Fire Conditions 21 Different Modern Construction Components Time/Temperature Curve 2000°F 4 HR 2000 1700°F 1 HR 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 1000°F 5 MIN 800 600 400 200 0 1 2 3 4 Modern Construction Unprotected 12” I Floor Joist Large percentage of floor is detached from test frame After Before Modern Construction Unprotected 12” I-Joist Test Assembly # 2 Post Photos Collapse Time = 6:00 (ISO 4:00) Legacy Construction Unprotected 2 x 10 Floor Joist Post Photos Collapse Time = 18:45 Assembly Structural Element Type Ceiling Finish Rating (min : sec) Protective Membrane Breach Allowable Deflection L/240 = ¾” (min : sec) Fire Fighter Breach (min : sec) 1 2x10 Joist Floor Legacy None 0:45 0:00 3:30 18:35 2 Wood I Joist Floor Lightweight None 0:30 0:00 3:15 6:00 8 2x10 Joist Floor Legacy Lath and plaster 74:001 741 75:45 79* 3 2x10 Joist Floor Legacy Regular gypsum wallboard 15:30 23:30 35:30 44:40 4 Wood I Joist Floor Lightweight Regular gypsum wallboard 7:45 17:45 3:30 26:43 5 Metal Gusset Truss Floor Lightweight Regular gypsum wallboard 10:45 16:30 20:45 29* 6 Finger Joint Truss Floor Lightweight Regular gypsum wallboard 12:15 16:00 24:00 26:30 7 2x6 Joist & Rafter Roof Legacy Regular gypsum wallboard 15:15 15:45 3 382 9 Metal Gusset Truss Roof Lightweight Regular gypsum wallboard 13:45 13:45 3 23:10 * - Denotes approximate time 1 - Denotes total failure of ceiling - plaster & lath had deflected down to & was supported by TC's prior to event 2 - Kneeling fire fighter fell over & flaming impacting on 3 - Denotes not applicable to roof structures Experimental Pictures 31 Improving Fire Safety by Enhancing the Fire Performance of Engineered Floor Systems and Providing the Fire Service with Information for Tactical Decision Making 32 Structural Beam Tests 33 Full-span field experiments 34 Full-span laboratory experiments Experiment 1 Floor System Wood I-Joist 2 3 Wood I-Joist Parallel Chord Wood Truss Description Repeat of Field Experiment 3, Max Ventilation Max Ventilation, Torch Ignition Gypsum ceiling, Void Ignition 4 Parallel Chord Wood Truss Gypsum ceiling, 80 ft2 exposed 35 Experimental Pictures 36 Existing Structure Experiments 37 Modern Suppression 38 Fire Formula of Modern Homes Larger Homes Open Spaces Inc. Fuel Loads Faster fire propagation Shorter time to flashover Rapid changes in fire dynamics Shorter escape times Voids Spaces Changing Bldg. Materials Shorter time to collapse 39 DHS / Assistance to Firefighters grant – PV and Fire Fighter Safety The project that addresses fire fighter’s concerns regarding fighting fires involving photovoltaic (PV) modules. The deployment of PV complicates traditional firefighter suppression, ventilation and overhaul tactics - potentially exposing firefighters to electrical hazards not encountered with traditional utility power supplies. •Shock Hazard Due to the Presence of Water and PV Power During Suppression Activities •Shock Hazard Due to the Direct Contact With Energized Components During Firefighting Operations •Emergency Disconnect and Disruption Techniques • Severing of Conductors • Assessment of PV Power During Low Ambient Light, Artificial Light and Light from a Fire • Assessment of Potential Shock Hazard From Damaged PV Modules and Systems Photos courtesy of College Park MD Fire Department 40 PV and Fire Fighter Safety Highlights – Power Generation, Fireground Illumination Experiments using ground lighting towers indicate that artificial light at night (e.g. ground scene lighting) can cause a typical rooftop PV array to generate current at hazardous levels. Current (mA) Hazard Leakage Safe 2 Perception 40 Lock On 240 Electrocution 1000 Volt Array with Night-Time Illumination from Fire Truck(s) Lighting Truck #1 Truck #2 Total Distance Bed 12 kW Bed 6 kW Lighting from Boom 6 kW Boom 4.5 kW kW Array (Feet) None Bed + Boom Volts MilliAmps Hazard 48 0 Safe 18 25 812 132 Lock On Bed + Boom 10.5 38 780 88 Lock On Boom 4.5 38 738 50 Lock On Bed + Boom 28.5 25 & 38 836 212 Lock On Partial Bed 3 25 657 22 Perception Partial Bed 1.5 25 575 11 Perception Bed + Boom 18 50 735 37 Perception Bed + Boom 10.5 75 700 22 Perception Bed + Boom 28.5 50 & 75 773 49 Lock On 1.5 50 340 1.5 Safe Bed + Boom Bed + Boom Partial Bed 41 PV and Fire Fighter Safety Highlights – Power Generation, Fire Illumination Using a stack of ignited wood skids to illuminate a PV module resulted in surprising results of hazardous power levels at various distances from the fire. Light from a Fire (Single Module) Distance from Open Circuit Short Circuit Fire (Feet) Volts MilliAmps Hazard 75 30 52 Lock On 50 31 57 Lock On 40 32 59 Lock On 15 33 62 Lock On Full Sun 37 7500 42 PV and Fire Fighter Safety Highlights – Depowering by Shielding Results indicate a range of effectiveness between commercially available salvage tarps and generic plastic sheet tarps ranging from minimal voltage output to null as compared to a baseline measurement. Cost Use of Various Tarps to Block Illumination Open Short Circuit Circuit Tarp Color Layers Volts Amps Hazard $15 $15 4.0 mil sheet 4.0 mil sheet Black Black 1 2 33 0.5 0 0 Safe Safe $16 $16 5.1 mil tarp 5.1 mil tarp Dark Blue Dark Blue 1 2 126 121 2.1 1 Electrocution Electrocution Salvage Canvas Dark Gray 1 3.2 0 Safe 1 124 1.8 Electrocution 148 8.1 $78 $94 Salvage Vinyl Full Sun Red Photo above courtesy of San Jose Fire Department.. 43 www.ul.com/fireservice 44 Impact of Ventilation on Fire Behavior in Legacy and Contemporary Residential Construction 1200 ft2 One-Story House 3200 ft2 Two-Story House 45 UL Web Site: www.ul.com © 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. www.ul.com/fireservice Fire Fighter Safety Projects 1) Impact of Ventilation on Fire Behavior in Legacy and Contemporary Residential Construction (2008 DHS AFG) 2) Structural Stability of Engineered Lumber in Fire Conditions (2006 DHS AFG) 3) Improving Fire Safety by Enhancing the Fire Performance of Engineered Floor Systems and Providing the Fire Service with Information for Tactical Decision Making (2009 NIST ARRA) 48 THANK YOU. Contact Information: Bob James Program Manager [email protected] 813-956-8669 www.ul.com/fireservice