Value to Utilities of Agronomic Uses for Gypsum Lamar Larrimore Southern Company September 13, 2006
Download ReportTranscript Value to Utilities of Agronomic Uses for Gypsum Lamar Larrimore Southern Company September 13, 2006
Value to Utilities of Agronomic Uses for Gypsum Lamar Larrimore Southern Company September 13, 2006 Large Volume Applications • Wallboard - established • Cement - established • Agronomic - potential – Crop yield – Soil erosion – Poultry waste runoff Estimated Gypsum Production and Demand U.S. Gypsum Production (M tons) 2004 Mined 18.0 Synthetic 12.0 Import 10.4 2010 2020 25.0 40.0 U.S. Gypsum Consumption (M tons) 2004 Total FGD Wallboard/Plaster 31.3 8.2 Cement 3.3 0.5 Agriculture Crop 0.7 0.15 Erosion Control Poultry Waste * AL, FL, GA, MS only Sources – USGS, USDA, ACAA Future Total similar similar ?? 18.0 * 4.0 * Conclusion – Manufacturing markets cannot absorb all FGD gypsum at peak production Gypsum Quality Requirements • Manufacturing applications have tighter restrictions for product performance needs moisture, purity, chlorides, ash, particle size • Agriculture has fewer criteria moisture, chlorides, Ca/S Environmental Questions • Trace element content • Potential volatilization of adsorbed emissions • Plant tissue uptake Possible Barriers • Regulatory – Environmental – Agriculture • Technical acceptance • Utility interest / commitment • Market composition – Fragmented with scattered demand (good/bad) • Marketers – Few large regional / national players with agricultural experience – Utilities not set up for agricultural marketing Reasons for Utility Interest • • • • • Low capital cost Applicable for all power plants Large potential market reduces storage needs Fewer quality criteria Broad needs – Crops – Soil types – Industries Actions • Continue to develop additional technical performance and environmental information • Develop demonstrations to lend credibility / publicity to lab results and presentations • Clearance on environmental regulations • Achieve comfort level so that additional permits, R&D, case studies not needed for commercial use • Encourage utilities or larger commercial participants to serve fragmented markets • Involve U.S. and State Departments of Agriculture