Coaches Training: Tier II and III

Download Report

Transcript Coaches Training: Tier II and III

Coaches Training
Introduction
Data Systems and Fidelity
Michael Lombardo
Director Interagency Facilitation
[email protected]
Rainbow Crane
Behavior RtI Coordinator
[email protected]
Ashley Reichardt
Student Service Practitioner
[email protected]
Goals for this Training
Get to know each other and define our
roles and responsibilities
2. Discuss implementation science and
fidelity
2. Review PBIS assessments and
assessment calendars
3. Gain knowledge regarding what's working
and how we can support each other.
1.
Roles and Responsibilities
Introducing PCOE Coordinators and Coaches
 Mike
 Rainbow
 Ashley
Your team should have?
 Admin
 At least 3 certificated staff
 Behaviorist/ Counselor/ School Psy.
 Classified Staff
 Parent
Roles of your Team members
Lead
 Coach
 Data Analyst
 Recorder
 Time Keeper
 Family member

Training and Coaching
OUTCOMES
% of Participants who Demonstrate Knowledge,
Demonstrate New Skills in a Training Setting,
and Use new Skills in the Classroom
Knowledge
Skill
Demonstration
Theory and
Discussion
10%
5%
0%
..+Demonstration
in Training
30%
20%
0%
…+ Practice &
Feedback in
Training
60%
60%
5%
…+ Coaching
in Classroom
95%
95%
95%
TRAINING
COMPONENTS
Use in the
Classroom
Joyce and Showers, 2002
Decision Support Data Systems
Purposes:





To improve student outcomes through data-based
decisions
Provide information to assess effectiveness of intervention
and prevention practices
Analyze the relationship of fidelity to outcomes
To guide further program development
 Detect discrete issues as well as systemic issues
Engage in continuous quality improvement



Interaction with Core Implementation Components
Celebrate success
Be accountable to consumers and funders
Decision Support Data Systems






Includes intermediate and longer-term
outcome measures
Includes process measures (fidelity)
Measures are “socially important” (e.g.
academic achievement, school safety)
Data are recent, reliable, relevant
Reliable (standardized protocols, trained data
gatherers)
Reported frequently (e.g. weekly, quarterly)
Decision Support Data Systems





Built into practice routines
Collected at and available to actionable units
(e.g. grade level, classroom, student “unit”)
Widely shared with school and District
personnel
Shared with family members and community
Used to make decisions (e.g. curricula,
training needed, coaching improvements)
Placer County Office Of Education
PBIS Website

http://sites.placercoe.k12.ca.us/pbis
Access:
 Overview of PBIS and Tier I, II, and III supports
 Training Schedules
 PBIS Assessments
 Lists of Schools and Coaches
 Recognition of schools implementing PBIS
 Helpful resources and links
PBIS Assessments
School Safety Survey (SSS)
 School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
 Self Assessment Survey (SAS)
 Team Implementation Checklist (TIC)
 https://www.pbisassessment.org/

School Safety Survey (SSS)



annual survey
Determines risk and protection factors for the school.
Completed by a minimum of five staff.






administrator
custodial staff member
certified staff member
office staff member.
Provides information determining training and support
needs related to school safety and violence
prevention.
Safety Survey
School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)


Research tool
Assess and evaluate the critical features of school-wide PBIS.









Expectations Defined
Behavior Expectations Taught
Rewarding Expectations
System for Responding to Behavioral Violations
Decision Making
Management and District Making
Management and District-Level Supports
Annual assessment completed by trained SET evaluators.
School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
What will we need?
Behavior expectation lesson plans and
teaching schedule
 Acknowledgement system
 Progressive discipline matrix/flowchart
 Discipline referral form
 Copy of your school improvement plan
 Yearly PBIS action plan

Self Assessment Survey (SAS)


annual assessment
Used by schools to identify the staff perception of the
status and priority for improvement for the following
systems:






School-wide
Classroom
Non Classroom
Individual Student Systems
Identifies the staff priorities for Action Planning.
Self-Assessment Survey (Paper completion directions)
Team Implementation Checklist
(TIC)
Completed by the PBIS Team and Coach.
 Progress monitoring tool
 Submitted three to four times per year.
 Team Checklist 3.1

PBIS Matrix of Implementation
PBIS Assessments (Handout 5)
Group Discussion

What is working….





Has your team had a meeting
3-5 rules in place
Behavior expectations defined per area
Lesson plans completed
What are some areas for improvement…..