Transcript Slide 1

TOWARDS A ‘GREEN REVOLUTION IN
AFRICA’-GOVERNANCE AND POLICY
PROCESSES
1 MAY 2008, Salzburg, Austria
Lindiwe Majele Sibanda (CEO, FANRPAN)
[email protected]
Outline of Presentation

Overview of Challenges and Key Issues-WHAT

Making it Happen – Reforming Africa’s
Governance and Policy Process- HOW

Revisiting the Architecture of Policy DevelopmentFANRPAN MODEL & WHO DOES WHAT
2
Wanjiku’s Dream -2015
●Land Owned - 1 hectare
●Crop diversity- from maize to staples &
high values crops
●Productivity: Maize yield from 250kg to
2.5t/ha
●Inputs: from recycled seed to highbrids &
fertilizer use: from 10 to 50% recommended
levels
• Implements: from hand hoe to
full span of 4 donkeys, eventually 2 oxen
3
Wanjiku’s Question
What will the African Green Revolution do for me?
Governance and Policy Processes are about PEOPLEThe WHAT? The HOW? THE WHO?
AFRICA’s Green Revolution must be about POOR
PEOPLE and IMPROVED LIVELIHOODS
How will the Green Revolution Policy and
Governance processes help Wanjiku out of poverty?
4
AFRICAN HOPE & HYPE games?
MILITARIZATION
HIV/AIDS
CORRUPTION
FAMINE
GREEN
PRIVATIZATION
REVOLUTION
MINIMAL STATE
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE
IMPUNITY
WAR
CORPORATE CONTROL
LIBERALISATION
WOMENS RIGHTS
ABUSES
CONDITIONALITY
DEBT
PATRONAGE
ETHNICITY
AFRICA: 1970-90s
SCRUBBLE 70s-90s A TIME FOR– war of
words in the colonies
AFRICA: 1990s- Structural Adjustment
Programs (SAPS)
A TIME FOR SAPS- SNAKES AND LADDERS & Yo-Yo
games
Living in Interesting Times: 2003-2015
SUDOKU games- Business of numbers: 10% national
budgets to agric sector; 6% annual growth for sector
NEPAD CAADP- Africans driving an African agenda
AFRICA sets TARGETS for AGRIC. Sector
(Objective Verifiable Indicators-OVIs)
Continental Commitments

MDGs –vision 2015

2003 -NEPAD CAADP- 6% annual growth and 10%
national budget for agriculture

2006- Abuja Declaration from 8 to 50kg fertilizer/ha

2007- AFRICA’S GREEN REVOLUTION launched- OVIs?
9
Governance
Issue
Where we are now
Target- 2020?
Macro
economic
Few African countries ranked in top Checks and balances prevent powerful actors
100 global investment destination
from circumventing and ignoring established
rules and principles
Education
Average of 4 yrs formal education for Improved use ICTs-Swaminathan Foundation
adult males and less than 3 yrs for model, Village Information Centres
adult females in sub-Saharan Africa
Health
services
HIV/AIDS and malaria
agricultural production
reduce Better coordination of the agriculture and health
agendas for improved productivity and welfare
Access
to Not yet a constitutional right in all Citizens be empowered to demand and use
information countries
information and exercise rights to hold
governments to account
Donor
funding
Dubious quality, short term, serves Better aligned, packaging, coordination an
interests of the donor countries; delivery of donor funds
benefits powerful domestic interest
groups; wasted on overpriced goods
services from donor countries
10
Policy Processes
Issue
Where we are
now
Medium term: 2010 Long term: 2020
Participation
Selected advisors,
trusted partisans,
donors
-Strengthen multistakeholder policy
dialogue platforms at
local level
-Build trust between
Gvt and CSOs
Strong networks with space
and capacity to engage
Knowledge of the policy The elite, educated,
process
technocrats ,
economists
participate
Evidence and policy
Unreliable data,
options
Weak infrastructure
for data collection
Weak analytical skills
Invest in building
capacity of ordinary
citizens to participate
CSOs participate and add
value to policy processes
Invest in longitudinal
household surveys,
production data, use
local researchers to
collect data
Evidence is a public good and
all citizens have access to
information and voice
Long term-proactive
planning
Aligned development
agenda
Policies and programmes
aligned to common goal
Knee jerk reaction
11
What does it take-Go for RED-Networks
External Influences
Political context
Politics and
Policymaking
Campaigning,
Lobbying
Policy analysis, &
research
Media,
Advocacy,
Networking
Scientific
information
exchange &
validation
Links
Research,
learning &
thinking
Evidence
Source: The Rapid Framework. Research and Policy in Development Programme Briefing Paper No1, October 2004
12
“AGR” What does it take- CSOs
Who
What
Ordinary Citizens
Demilitarise and empower with evidence to strengthen advocacy
and hold GVT to account
Farmer Organisations
Honest , credible leadership, set the agenda communicate issues
National Research
Organizations
Relevance, Credibility, Consistency,
North-South and South to South Partnerships
Inter disciplinary and multi-disciplinary teams
Longitudinal studies
Private Sector (input
suppliers, processors,
wholesalers, retailers)
Contribute to policy process in a transparent manner
Women
Empowerment, Have a voice and insist on being heard; Honest
representation
13
CSO Influence on GVT Policies
14
“AGR’-What does it take- African Gvts?
What
Policy Processes
Provide information, and space for CSO engagement
Build the infrastructure to do policy analysis within and outside government- use
local experts
Policy Infrastructure
Balance social protection and economic growth agenda
Invest in data collection-household surveys to understand livelihoods
Be responsive to present and future Needs
Developing policies that safeguard the interest of local farmers
Governance
Accountability-transparent financial systems, peer review
Create a conducive environment for investments
protect property rights, peace and safety
15
Public Service Delivery-not monitored
16
Rule of Law
17
“AGR” -What does it take? Cont.
Who
RECs AU
What
Provide political leadership
Align green revolution agenda to CAADP policy framework
Strengthen technical and administrative capacity of RECs,
promote regional integration
Finance
Increase funding for hardware- infrastructure for agriculture-energy,
Institutions
telecommunications, irrigation, roads
(AfDB/WB/priv
ate)
Donors
Obligation under the Paris Declaration –
Support policy processes with funds and technical assistance
Less on food and more on long term development programmes
Support empowerment programs capacity building programs in
totality
Align to local priorities don’t divert the agenda
CGIARs
Work in partnership with and strengthen capacity of NARES
Provide evidence to support policy development at regional level,
Analyse impacts of policy options, Evaluate policy outcomes
18
Learning from Success and Failures
Malawi Green Rev 2004-7
Zimbabwe Green Rev.1980-90
Previous Gvt – offered subsidy
New Gvt with support from IMF
abandons subsidies
Presidents makes public
announcement
Gvt intensifies extension, input
supply, hybrids, produce markets
Gvt1990 abandons subsidies, private sec.
active on input, but no link to value chain
In 2000 Gvt re-introduces subsidies
National budget includes subsidy
Gov. controlled interventions
Limited private sector involved
Can we Sustain the Success
Legitimatize the policy
Collapse of the agric sector
19
Constitutional Checks
20
Including the Excluded-9 Step Participation Model
Citizen control
8
Delegated power
7
Partnership
6
Placation
5
Consultation
4
Informing
3
Therapy
2
Manipulation
1
Citizen Power
Tokenism
Nonparticipation
Sherry R. Arnstein. ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’ http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation.html
21
Channels for Reaching the Excluded
 Local drama groups-theatre for community action
 Video, television, news print, radio
 Farmer field schools
 Posters, stickers and banners
 Local Indabas- Dialogues
 Structured Multi-stakeholder Networks
22
Policy Networks
 Invest in Regional and national multi-stakeholder networks
 Promote platforms for policy dialogue –African Oral Culture
 Sharing knowledge interact ion with policy makers
 Promote
Innovation Systems Approach -Cultivate and
promote interactions between research, knowledge use and
policy development
23
What value will Policy networks bring?
●
All inclusive multi-stakeholder platform -government, technocrats,
farmers, private sector, consumers, journalists, politicians, technocrats
●
Build credible dialogue platforms at local level use evidence to support
policy development
●
Facilitate linkages and partnerships between government and civil
society , Linking policy supply to demand
●
Partnerships for building the capacity for policy analysis - regionally,
North-South, South-South
24
What value will Policy networks bring to GR
●
Promote peer reviews
●
Host high level policy events
●
Capacity enhancement-collation of dispersed skills
●
Platform for action research , knowledge production, documentation
and articulation of own story,
●
Identifying strategic issues to amplify
●
Encourages solidarity with vulnerable groups without seeking to
brand
25
Example from practiceFANRPAN Regional Policy Dialogues – 2001- 2007
YEAR
Number of Delegates
Stakeholders
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Sep-07
23
35
105
51
125
46
81
155
Govt (Perm Secs), Researcher, Donors, Pvt Sector
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" plus CSOs
"
" plus CSOs, INGOs
"
" plus CSOs, INGOs, Parliamentarians
" plus CSOs, INGOS, Parliamentarians, Journalists
26
Wanjiku’s CALL for Action
●Demystify Policy Processes
●Give me a VOICE
●Create Space & Political cover
●Provide Options & Means
27
Key Questions for a Uniquely African Green
Revolution
1.
How can we ensure that all stakeholders and particularly the
vulnerable groups and ordinary citizens have a voice in policy
processes?
2.
What role can regional policy networks play to align policies and
political processes to support pro-poor growth and Africa’s green
revolution?
3.
What information should African governments provide (key indicators)
as evidence of commitment to pro-poor growth and African green
revolution goals?
4.
How can donors make development assistance to the green revolution
more effective?
28
FANRPAN Regional Policy Dialogue, Lusaka Zambia
THANK YOU
29