Transcript Document

Grading of the
Institutes
Under
Haryana State Counseling Society
India
Submitted By
Dr. S. N. Nandi and Dilip Gayen
DELHI
VIEW ON COST, QUALITY & TIME
QUALITY
TO COMPLETE
THIS
ASSIGNMENT
COST
TIME
The process is very cumbersome and time
consuming for an institute.
The process creates fear and misunderstanding
on the part of an individual institute
Both the faculty members and administrative
staff hardly participates intellectually
The process is often perceived as an inspection
by a few outsiders with all the hide and seek
elements
There is a shortage of trained manpower to conduct the
process
As the accreditation is being done by a regulatory
agency itself, the effectiveness is diluted.
It is required to be reviewed and
reengineered especially in the light of new
concepts –
Total Quality
Organizational
Performance
Excellence
Benchmarking
For comprehensive and participative system of
Grading/Rating and Accreditation for
Technical Education
ISO-9000
Standard
Benchmarking
TQM principles
Grading
/ Rating
and
Accreditation
EFQM
MBNQA
(Malcolm Baldrige
National Quality
Award in USA)
(European
Foundation of
Quality
Management)
THE EFQM EXCELLENCE
MODEL
Results
Enablers
Partnership &
Resources
People
Result
Customer
Result
Society
Result
Innovation & Learning
Key Performance
Results
Policy &
Strategy
Processes
Leadership
People
THE MBNQA MODEL
Customer and Market Focused
Strategy and Action Plans
Strategic
Planning
HRD and
Management
Business
Result
Leadership
Customer and
Market focus
Process
Management
Information & Analysis
Scope of the study
Identification of criteria and related
parameters and formulation of strategy
and
 Model & methodology for assessment of
the above and
Finally application of the same for all the
technical Institutes selected in the state
of Haryana.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Sl. No.
Factor
New
Institute
Total Marks
Old Institute
Total Marks
1.
Governance and Leadership
200
150
2.
Human Resources
150
150
3.
Teaching, Learning and
Evaluation
250
250
4.
Infrastructure
250
250
5.
Students Support and
Progression
150
100
6.
Research, Consultancy and
Extension
Nil
100
1000
1000
7.
Total
1.
Governance and Leadership
This factor examines the Mission and Vision with which the Chief Executive has been
building up the Institute. The focus of this examination will be assessment of depth
of commitment the Chief Executive as reflected in his plan of action. His action
should reflect his concern for development of internal leadership and environment.
Some of the areas such actions could be reflected are as follows:
•Quality of persons selected as academic head of the Institution/Director.
•Use of external networking for the development of Institute.
•Availability of funding.
•Development of internal environment (both academic and non-academic ones).
•Strategy in action (as reflected in choice of main area of study selected and nature
of specialization offered).
This factor also examines the support and encouragement being given to continuous
quality improvements in all academic and non-academic activities and building up
names and fames of the Institute to various stakeholders.
Sub-Factor Considered:
1.Selection of Director and of Teachers and the methods of selection
2.Selection of main area of study and of specialization
3.External Network accessible (by CEO, Directors and other influencing
members of the Institute)
4.Availability of capital fund, future plan and provisions and scope for further
expansion
5.Quality Orientation and image and goodwill of the Institutes
2.
Human Resources
This factor essentially examines quality and adequacy of teachers and of supporting
staff. Teaching staff should be mix of both young and old with sufficient amount of
teaching and or corporate experiences. Besides teaching, they should be inclined to
carry out various kinds of academic persuasions like guiding research work, writing
papers, coordinating professional activities etc.
Sub-Factor Considered:
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Adequacy
a)
Full time Faculty : Students
b)
Visiting Faculty : Full time
Qualification of Full time Faculty Members
Experiences
a)
Teaching
b)
Corporate
Engagement on Research / Professional Activities
Days spent on development programs per Faculty
3. Teaching, Learning and Evaluation
This factor examines curriculum, session planning, teaching methodology and evaluation
system under quality of curriculum and appropriateness of specialization are prime concern
under this factor. The Institute should ensure that time table plan in advance is adhered to.
There should be effective examination systems for both internal and external assessments.
Sub-Factor Considered:
Quality of Students
a)
Cut off points (Ranks) received in Entry Examination
b)
Percentage of Management Quota and Selection Method
Employed
•Background / Discipline
1.Feedback & Results
•Changes made / suggested to the University for Curriculum
•Academic Results in terms of percentage of students clearing all the papers first time
1.Sessions
•Total hours : Planed Vs. Actual
•Percentage of hours taken up by outsiders
•Percentage of hours by non-lecture methods
1.Evaluations
•Distribution of marks for internal assessment
•Summer Projects - Report and Evaluation Records existing
1.Feed back from Students
•System available for feed back
•Percentage of students satisfied
Infrastructure
This factor examines adequacy of modern facilities like Lecture Halls, Audio Visual aids,
Library and IT facilities. These facilities are not only acquired but also arrangements are
being made for their proper upkeep.
4.
Sub-Factor Considered:
4.1
a)
b)
c)
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Classroom
Total Area (square meters) / student covering both technical and tutorial rooms
Percentage of Area (square meters) with AC
Number of LCD and Projectors per 60 Students
Library
a)
Areas per student
b)
Copies of books per student
c)
Number of titles per 1000 copies of books
d)
Number of journals per student
e)
Percentage of journals published abroad
IT
a)
Number of Computers per student
b)
De-centralized Vs Centralized
c)
Percentage of Computers with Internet Access
Physical Facility
a)
Effective availability of Generator
b)
Effective availability of Lift if number of stories exceed 3
c)
Effective availability of Canteen
d)
Effective availability of Hostel
e)
Effective availability of Transport
Security
a)
Availability of 24 hours Security arrangements
b)
Availability of Health Checkup and Emergency arrangements
c)
Number of negative comments on Housekeeping
5.
Research, Consultancy and Extension
This factor examines not only provisions but also encouragement made to the Faculty
members and students to undertake Research, Consultancy, Collaborative Projects
and Extension Services so that their knowledge and expertise are being harnessed. It
also may supplement the institute’s income to small extent.
Sub-Factor Considered:
5.1
5.2
Number of Projects
Values of Projects
6.
Student Support and Progression
This factor examines arrangements and encouragements being made to provide to the
students for their welfare, development and placement with potential recruiters.
Sub-Factor Considered:
6.1
No. of Hours spent on student development work per semester
6.2
No of committees and of man days spent for participatory welfare and self
management activities
6.3
No. of sessions per subject per semester conducted by faculties from
industries and Alumni
6.4
No of student days spent per semester for Industry related activities
6.5
No. of organizations contacted and agreed for Project work
6.6
Recognition received by students in any external event
DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL MARKS FOR GRADING
Sl.
No
Grading Criteria
Grade
Code
Scores / Grade Ranges
( %)
1
Outstanding
A+
More than 90%
2
Excellent
A
From 85 to 90%
3
Very Good
B+
From 80 to Less than 85%
4
Good
B
From 75 to Less than 80%
5
Fair
C+
From 70 to Less than 75%
6
Above Average
C
From 65 to Less than 70%
7
Average
D+
From 60 to Less than 65%
8
Below Average
D
From 45 to Less than 60%
9
Up Gradable
E
Less than 45%
Note:
1.For Old Institute All the above Process of Evaluation will be applicable in a Separate
List
2.For Old Institutes (That Institutes where 1st batch not Passes out) will be listed in a
separate list of the same assessment Criteria.
EVALUATION OF INSTITUTES FOR GRADING FOR OLD
INSTITUTES
Sl.
No.
Item
Total Marks
1
Governance and Leadership
150.0
1.1
Selection of Director and of Teachers and the
methods of selection
30
1.2
Selection of main area of study and of
specialization
30
1.3
External Network accessible (by CEO, Directors
and other influencing members of the Institute)
30
1.4
Availability of capital fund, future plan and
provisions and scope for further expansion
30
1.5
Quality Orientation and image and goodwill of the
Institutes
30
2
Human Resources
150.0
Adequacy
30.0
Qualification
20.0
Composition
20.0
Experience
30.0
Research Interest
30.0
Faculty Training
20.0
Teaching, Learning and Evaluation
3
250
3.1
Quality of Students
50.0
3.2
Curriculum Feedback and Results
50.0
3.3
Sessions
50.0
3.4
Evaluations
50.0
3.5
Feedback from Students
50.0
Infrastructure
4
250.0
4.1
Classroom
60.0
4.2
Library
60.0
4.3
IT Facility
50.0
4.4
Physical Facility
50.0
4.5
Security
30.0
5
Research, Consultancy and Extension
100.0
5.1
Number of Projects
50
5.2
Values of Projects
50
6
Student Support and Progression
100.0
6.1
No. of Hours spent on student development work per semester
20
6.2
No of committees and of man days spent for participatory welfare and self
management activities
10
6.3
No. of sessions per subject per semester conducted by faculties from
industries and Alumni
10
6.4
No of student days spent per semester for Industry related activities
30
6.5
No. of organizations contacted and agreed for Project work
20
5.6
Recognition received by students in any external event
10
EVALUATION OF INSTITUTES FOR GRADING
FOR NEW INSTITUTES
Sl.
No.
Item
Total
Marks
1
Governance and Leadership
200.0
1.1
Selection of Director and of Teachers and the
methods of selection
50
1.2
Selection of main area of study and of
specialization
40
1.3
External Network accessible (by CEO, Directors
and other influencing members of the Institute)
35
1.4
Availability of capital fund, future plan and
provisions and scope for further expansion
40
1.5
Quality Orientation and image and goodwill of
the Institutes
35
2
Human Resources
150.0
Adequacy
30.0
Qualification
20.0
Composition
20.0
Experience
30.0
Research Interest
30.0
Faculty Training
20.0
Teaching, Learning and Evaluation
3
250
3.1
Quality of Students
50.0
3.2
Curriculam Feedback and Results
50.0
3.3
Sessions
50.0
3.4
Evaluations
50.0
3.5
Feedback from Students
50.0
Infrastructure
250.0
4.1
Classroom
60.0
4.2
Library
60.0
4.3
IT Facility
50.0
4.4
Physical Facility
50.0
4.5
Security
30.0
4
5
Student Support and Progression
150.0
5.1
No. of Hours spent on student development work per semester
30
5.2
No of committees and of man days spent for participatory welfare and self
management activities
20
5.3
No. of sessions per subject per semester conducted by faculties from
industries and Alumni
30
5.4
No of student days spent per semester for Industry related activities
30
5.5
No. of organizations contacted and agreed for Project work
20
5.6
Recognition received by students in any external event
20
TOTAL
1000.0
Terms of Reference
The study will be carried out in 2 Phases:
I-Model Development. & Piloting and
II- Rolling out
Broad activities to be performed in each of
the two phases are given below:
.
Approach & Methodology
1. An apex Committee consisting of Educationist,
Industry Practitioners and Professionals for
Guidance on model development
2. A team of 2-4 consultants will make the necessary
Literature Survey, discussion with Stakeholders and
visit to a sample number of Technical Institute in
order to develop the necessary model and
methodology. The tam will carry out all the necessary
steps as outlined under Terms of Reference.
Phase – I: Formulation and Validation
I. To study the present status of Technical Education
in India vis-à-vis in Haryana, the emergent
requirements for students’ career and job
potentialities and of other stakeholders and
prevalent conditions in the Technical Institutes in
the state and to develop a suitable model depicting
criteria and their interrelationship reflecting total
quality of the Technical Institutes under
consideration.
Phase – I: Formulation and Validation (contd….)
II. To study existing vision & Mission, Policy, Process,
Human Resource aspects and information
infrastructure prevalent in Technical Institutes
and to identify parameters and measures
reflecting the selected criteria as well as to develop
appropriate methodology of collecting data related
to parameters and measures identified. A
Development workshop with the Representatives
from Technical Institutes will be organized for this
purpose.
Phase – I: Formulation and Validation (contd….)
III. To apply the above mentioned model
and methodology to a sample number
of 5 Institutes for pilot run and work
out Grading/Rating and Accreditation
and then after to validate the model by
comparing the results with overall
perception of stakeholders & fine tune
the model and methodology, if
necessary.
Phase-II: Rolling out
To apply the model and methodology thus
validated as above for the remaining
Institutes.
Phase-II: Rolling out (Contd…)
1. One Orientation workshop of 1 days duration
will be organized for a group of nominated staff
member from every batch of 15-20 Institutes. These
nominated members will participate actively in
assessment by filling up the application from and
coordinating the site visit to be conducted by
assessment team at their respective institutes.
2. Grading/ Rating and subsequently accreditation will
be worked out based on verified quantitative date
obtained
through
application
forms
and
observations made by the study team during their
study visits.
3. Questionnaire and Process of Grading would be
presented and discussed as per requirement and
demand by HSCS
East West InfoSolutions
A Profile
Established by a group of Technical & Management professionals in the years
of 2003. EWIS has emerged as an ‘Management Consultancy and Business
Solutions Company’ integrating latest in technologies and people. The
company headed by eminent Professionals has emerged as an icon of
understanding the ‘Customer needs’ and in molding them into a progressive
vehicle of tomorrow. Our Dynamic engineers are flexible enough to meet the
challenges of the emerging market scenario. We believe in building
relationships through a total commitment to Quality and Reliability. The
company offers highly specialized skills in our areas, Evolution Oriented
Systems, Procedures and Packages. We are Strategic, Focused, Streamlined
and Integrated. The guiding philosophy of EWIS is the way of life here.
WE OFFER (SERVICES)
BUSINSS CONSULTANCY (HR, MARKETING & FINANCE)
TRAINING
ECONOMIC SURVEY
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
E-GOVERNANCE
CORPORATE CONSULTING / ON–SITE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT
BUSINESS PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING
Business Application
Organisation Strategy Management
Efficiency Measurement
Benchmarking
Organizational Restructuring and Process Improvement
Financial Analysis
EWIS delivers the highest level of expertise and flexibility to
meet your needs:
Just-in-time approach to service delivery, when and how to
apply our expertise.
Knowledge transfer helps you gain long-term value
Experienced professionals help you relieve congestion,
reconfigure present system and new applications, and
better manage
In addition to EWIS services offers comprehensive
Consultancy from Design to Implementation of the
required Services.
Why you should choose EWIS over other
companies??
We react and get things done fast
We are flexible and make decisions quickly to respond to
client needs and solve client problems
We have close professional relationship with all our clients
Our low operating overheads are reflected in our charges to
our clients
We agree payment linked to project deliverables with our
client
Our expertise makes you save time and therefore cost
within your company by not having to educate
implementation consultants
We ensure complete customer satisfaction
A Select list of Assignments completed
A. Benchmarking study for the following sectors
1. Engineering Industry
2. Automobile Industry
3. Sugar Industry
4. Fertilizer Industry
5. Pharmaceutical Industry
6. Machine Tools Industry
7. Power Plants
8. Management Institutes
9. Environmental Laboratories
10. Shipping agencies
11. Software firms
B. Formulation of Award scheme and evaluation of
participating organisations for award
1. Public sector known as SCOPE EXCELLENCE
AWARD for Public Sector firms covering both
Manufacturing and Service organization.
2. Steel, Sector – PM Trophy for the best Steel
plant in both Public and Private sectors
3. E-Governance award by the Government of India
4. Comparative Evaluation of innovativeness in IT
Firms
C. Consulting service to CSIR for evaluation of
performances of research and development
Institutes