Transcript Document

®

MedBiquitous Orientation Chara Balasubramaiam

MedBiquitous Europe

Valerie Smothers

MedBiquitous MedBiquitous Annual Conference May 9, 2011

Objectives

• • • At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: Describe what a technology standard is and the potential benefits standards afford Describe technology standards developed by MedBiquitous Identify opportunities for collaboration and integration leveraging standards ®

Overview

• • • • • Introductions What is MedBiquitous?

What advances have been made?

Summary How to participate ®

Introductions

What do you hope to learn today?

®

What is MedBiquitous?

®

MedBiquitous Mission

To advance healthcare education through technology standards that promote professional competence, collaboration, and better patient care.

Not-for-profit, member-driven, standards development organization

®

The Fragmented Healthcare Industry

Accrediting Bodies Universities Licensing Boards

?

Societies Certifying Boards Government International Partners ®

How it all started…

And it kept growing… ®

MedBiquitous: Technology Standards for Healthcare Education

• • • • 50 member organizations 8 Working Groups ANSI process • • • • Openness Transparency Consensus Due process Work with leading organizations that can drive adoption

Professional Profile Activity Reporting Virtual Patients Competencies Learning Objects Metrics Curriculum Inventory Educational Trajectory

®

MedBiquitous Goals

• • • • Better

tracking

and evaluation of professional education and certification activities Easier

discovery

of relevant education and information resources when and where needed

Interoperability

online education and sharing of high quality

Coordination

and tracking of competence assessment data ®

MedBiquitous Process

Executive committee Working groups Standards committee • Approves new standards projects • • Meets via telco, in person Develops specifications • • Consensus body Votes ANSI • Final approval ®

Why standards?

®

Why standards?

Activity

You are designing your own searchable cookbook for all of the recipes you download from the internet.

Develop a data structure for a cooking recipe. Describe some of the benefits of having this standard.

10 min

®

Why standards?

• • • To facilitate exchange of data and resources To enable collaboration To create economies and networks of scale ®

Your Challenges

Activity

What information exchange, coordination, or integration challenges do you have?

5 min

®

What Standards has MedBiquitous created?

®

Sharing Educational Resources

• • • • MedBiquitous Virtual Patient (Chara) The eViP Programme (Chara) Healthcare LOM (Valerie) mEducator (Chara) ®

Virtual Patients

Definition: An interactive computer simulation

of real-life clinical scenarios for the purpose of medical training, education, or assessment.

Why?

Several schools are developing

Need a framework that would allow these virtual patients to be shared across systems

®

Why Share Virtual Patients?

• • • Costly to develop Time consuming to develop Requires significant technical, subject matter, and pedagogical expertise ®

How Technology Standards for Virtual Patients Could Work

Institution A Institution B ®

Network Effect

Created by Derrick Coetzee ®

Why technology standards?

• • • • Leverage content developed elsewhere (VP banks) Coordinate development efforts across a discipline (ex. Geriatrics Education) Coordinate with other learning systems (SCORM 2004) Provide flexibility in choosing VP authoring and delivery system (protecting your investment) ®

MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Specification SCORM Package

®

®

electronic Virtual Patients

• 3-Year programme involving 6 separate projects • 9 European partners and other collaborators • Co-funded by the European Commission

“To create a shared online bank of virtual patients, adapted for multicultural and multilingual use, for the improved quality and efficiency of medical and healthcare education across the world”

www.virtualpatients.eu

®

6.

7.

8.

9.

1.

eViP Partners

St George’s, University of London, UK 2.

3.

4.

5.

Karolinska Institutet, Sweden Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany University of Warwick, UK Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands Heidelberg University, Germany University of Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Poland University of Witten Herdecke, Germany www.virtualpatients.eu

®

VP Repurposing and Enrichment

“Repurposing is to convert a VP created for one purpose into a VP fit for another purpose” “Content enrichment is to add different learning objects such as text, videos, sounds, images, animations, assessments and even Second Life scenarios to an existing VP in order to enhance the educational value of that VP”

eViP definition: http://www.virtualpatients.eu/about-evip/about-the project/evip-definitions/

Led by Karolinska Institutet (Sweden) involving all partners

www.virtualpatients.eu

®

Typical Repurposing Workflow

UM Workflow Identify ‘paediatric VPs’

delivered in HD

Lars START Select VPs from HD

not yet available in UM Repurposed and enriched demo cases available here: http://www.virtualpatients.eu/resources/demos/ curriculum and

identify

native speaker to Dutch culture)

missing content to

experts at UM

enrich Repurpose and enrich VP

for local culture and educational scenario

Customise VP player user interface

(e.g. from HD to UM)

Adapt Virtual Learning Environment

to fit the VP

Test and GO-LIVE FINISH

www.virtualpatients.eu

®

How are VPs used?

Problem-based learning Teaching Learning Exams www.virtualpatients.eu

®

Problem-based Learning Sessions

®

Teaching Sessions

®

Self-directed Learning

®

Formative and Summative Exams

®

Outcomes

• Referatory of 320+ collective VPs for multilingual, multicultural access, and integrated into curricula • Tried and tested standards • Sustainable network of faculties for the development and exchange of VPs • Common content licensing model

Major resource for medical and healthcare education to be shared by all institutions across the sector

www.virtualpatients.eu

®

Healthcare LOM

• • • • Mechanism for describing images and learning content in a repository & portfolio Easier search and discovery, potentially automated Extends IEEE LOM Used by AAMC, HEAL, VA ®

Healthcare LOM Uses

Title: Aresenic Toxicity Keyword: Environmental medicine, MeSH D019550 Target audience: Physician, registered nurse Credits:: CME 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1; CNE 1.7 contact hours Health Education Title: Preventing sports injuries Target audience: Patient Database B ®

Healthcare LOM Structure

®

Healthcare LOM Structure

®

mEducator: A Best Practice Network for Repurposing and Sharing Medical Educational Multi-type Content co-funded by the European Commission eContentplus programme http://www.meducator.net

co-funded by the European Commission eContentplus programme

Setting the Scene

Academic Institution has/creates autonomous specialized educational modules

44 ®

co-funded by the European Commission eContentplus programme

Setting the Scene

Academic Institution Academic Institution autonomous specialized educational modules autonomous specialized

educational modules

Inter-Institution Communication cannot always be effective

autonomous specialized educational modules

45 ®

co-funded by the European Commission eContentplus programme

Setting the Scene

Need of virtual distributed pools of autonomous specialized educational modules Class Discussion Forums Class Wikis

mechanisms for

  

Searching

Rating Retrieving

Adapting Evaluating

Revising educational content in Medicine and Life sciences

®

co-funded by the European Commission eContentplus programme

mEducator

project title: mEducator: Multi-type Content Repurposing and Sharing in Medical Education project type: Best Practice Network programme : eContentplus Information Society & Media Directorate General, Εuropean Commission duration : 2009-2012 consortium : 14 partners from 10 EU countries, lead by AUTH (GR) website : http://www.meducator.net/ ®

Aim:

To enable specialized state-of-the-art medical educational content of varying types to be discovered, retrieved, shared and re-used across European higher academic institutions.

How:

By implementing and evaluating two different solutions • A “mashup” platform that aggregates content published in isolated Learning Content Management Systems (LCMS) • A federated architecture of LCMSs based on Semantic Web Services for search, interchange and delivery of learning objects ®

Openness

mEducator project aims at Openness and Open Educational Resources

49 ®

How can you benefit?

Register

and join the

mEducator

community http://www.meducator.net

®

Your Experience

Activity

Have you shared resources with other organizations? What are the benefits and complications of sharing resources?

5 min

®

Break – 15 minutes

®

Tracking and Measuring Competence

• • • • • Professional Profile Competency Framework Educational Trajectory Activity Report Medical Education Metrics ®

Professional Profile Use Case

• • Common format for exchanging information about healthcare professionals • • • • • • • • Contact Education Training Certification License Disciplinary action Academic appointments Memberships Facilitates cross organization collaboration ®

Benefits of standardization

• • • • Faster to process standardized data Faster to develop new applications Easier to work with partner organizations Able to automate many business processes • Users: ABMS, AOA for faster credentialing ®

Status of Professional Profile

• • Approved standard Revising standard as part of required maintenance ®

Competency Object

• Any abstract statement of learning or performance expectations, and information related to the statement. ID Title Description Category ®

Competency Framework

• An organized and structured representation of a set of interrelated and purposeful competency objects.

®

Uses for a Competency Standard

• • • Allow learners to track their accomplishments against a list of relevant competencies Enable educators to see how their curriculum fits into a competency framework Enable content developers to tie educational activities to a competency framework ®

Learning Objects LMS Evidence Portfolio Curriculum Curriculum Mgt

Status of Competency Framework

Executive committee • Working drafts of schema and specification available Working groups • Working draft of competency object schema and specification available, too.

Standards committee ANSI ®

Educational Trajectory

• • Provides common format to support the tracking, planning, and audit of learners’ educational trajectory across medical schools and national organizations “the path of an individual learner through one or more programs of study…” ®

Year 05 – 06 06 – 07 07 – 08 08 – 09 09-10

John Doe’s Educational Trajectory

John Doe, December 8, 2009 http://www.example.edu/portfolio/1234 Quarter 1 (Jun Aug) Quarter 2 (Sep Nov) Quarter 3 (Dec – Feb) Quarter 4 (Mar – May) 02 02 02 03 01 02 03 01 02 03 01 02 02 01 02 01 Coursework leading to MD/primary degree Coursework beyond MD/primary degree Enrichment, priority Enrichment

Status of Educational Trajectory

• • Schema and specification available on MedBiquitous website Profile of LEAP2A specification ®

Activity Report

• • Provides a standard XML format for continuing education/continuing professional development certificates and Maintenance of Certification (MoC) activity reports Allows organizations to centrally track learning and performance improvement ®

Current Problems with CE Tracking

• • • • We aren’t tracking CE We don’t help the learner assess gaps We can’t tell if CE matches learner’s practice-based needs We don’t verify claimed credits for certification or licensure ®

Reporting and Tracking CE/MoC

Provider A

Activity report

CE Tracker

Dr. John Doe’s CE Tracker A: Asthma Management B: Bronchodialators A: Pain Management .5 cr .5 cr .5 cr Report to Board Activity report

Provider B

®

Status of Activity Report

• • • Approved standard Maintenance of standard underway Users include American Board of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association, HighWire Press, Mesdcape, AOA, and CECity ®

MEMS: Medical Education Metrics

• • Technology standard for core evaluation data Users •

Educators

want best practices, ability to compare •

Funders

want to measure reach and efficacy •

Accreditors

want to measure success of activity and provider ®

MEMS Data

• • • • Activity Description • What’s being evaluated Participant Activity Evaluation • What did participants think Participation Metrics • How many people participated Learner Demographics ®

MEMS Use Case

CE provider CE provider CE provider ACCME PARS ®

Status of MEMS

• • • Approved standard Used by ACCME for Program Activity Reporting System (PARS) CECity, Rievent Technologies, DLC Solutions have implemented ®

New Development

• • Curriculum Inventory Educational Achievement ®

Continuum of Learning Initiative (CLI) Pre-Med UGME Performance Improvement GME Performance Improvement Portal Curriculum Inventory Portal Innovations Portal MedEdPORTAL

Tracking professionals

Activity

How many are engaged in efforts to track credentials, competencies, or professional development?

5 min

®

Summary

®

Building the Foundation

* American National Standard e-folio ®

MedBiquitous Goals

• Better

tracking

and evaluation of professional education and certification activities • Activity Report • Medical Education Metrics • • Educational Trajectory Curriculum Inventory ®

MedBiquitous Goals

• • Easier

discovery

of relevant education and information resources when and where needed • Healthcare LOM

Interoperability

online education and sharing of high quality • MedBiquitous Virtual Patient ®

MedBiquitous Goals

Coordination

and tracking of competence assessment data • Professional Profile • • Competency Framework Educational Achievement ®

Curriculum Transformation

Activity

The Vice Dean wants you to prepare for the upcoming LCME accreditation review…

15 min

®

Back to your challenges

• • • Can existing standards address any of the challenges you face?

Are there needs for other standards?

Are there potential benefits to using standards for your organization?

®

How to Participate

• • • Become a member and sign up for working groups Become a member of the Standards Committee and vote on standards proposals Participate in meetings and share your work ®

Contact

Valerie Smothers [email protected]

Chara Balasubramaniam

[email protected]

www.medbiq.org

®