Transcript Ken DeCerchio's Presentation 10-21-10

Overview of the
Collaborative Capacity
Instrument
Integration of Services
Leadership Meeting
October 21, 2010
CCI - Purpose
•
Self-assessment of collaborative efforts
between alcohol and other drug (AOD) and
child welfare service (CWS) agencies and
dependency courts
•
To assist in moving jurisdictions to a new level
of collaboration
•
To assist in prioritization of collaborative efforts
and changes in practice and policy
•
To self-assess consensus and disagreement
on values that underlie collaboration
The Ten Bridges
• The CCI is organized based on the ten-element
framework of collaboration among child welfare,
treatment, and the courts
• Questions in each of the ten areas allow sites to
self-assess their progress in building stronger
linkages to the other systems and where those
linkages are most effective
Elements of System Linkages
The Ten Key Bridges
Mission
1. Underlying Values and Priorities
Children, Family, Tribal, and Community Services
2. Screening and
Assessment
3. Engagement and
Retention
5. Community and Family
Support
4. Services for Children
System Elements
6. Information Systems
7. Training and System Tools
8. Budget and Sustainability
9. Working with Other
Agencies
Outcomes
10. Shared Outcomes and Systems Reforms
TEXT PAGE
Florida Version
• ADDS
o Integration of Health Care Services
o Integration of Case Plans
o Strengths and barriers to integration of
services
TEXT PAGE
Florida Version
• DELETES
o Engagement and Retention
o Services for Children
o Community and Family Support
o Training and System Tools
TEXT PAGE
Screen for Highlights
• Present highlights, not every single response
• Consensus: where can we build on agreement?
• Disagreement: which disagreements are
strongest and how will they affect practice and
policy changes?
• Information gaps/don’t knows: where can we
build agreement with better information?
The Value of Trend Lines
• Doing another CCI 12-18 months later identifies
areas of progress and improved information
flows
• Some measures may go down as respondents
recognize they really don’t do what is being
spotlighted, once they understand the question
better
Review responses for…
• Representativeness—who’s missing? How do
answers differ by agency? Can those differences
start a useful conversation?
• Level of organization—front-line vs supervisory
vs policy
•
•
•
•
Present Results to Team and Discuss Findings
Prioritize Opportunities for Improvement
Develop Action Plan
Re-Administer in 18 months