Transcript Click Here

Welcome to
UShop!
• Sub 70% contract compliance
• Paper-based
• Inefficient
• Not transparent
• Dysfunctional vendor management
• $70M annual Pcard spend that requires paper processing of
each transaction
• Annual paper-based transaction volume
• 92,000 Suppliers
• 25,000 Purchase Orders
• 315,000 Invoices
• 56,000 Direct Payments
• Majority of payments made by paper check
• Overall lack of data availability
• Too many different ways to procure and pay – all paper based
• Requisition and Purchase Order
• PCard
• Limited Purchase Order
• Payment Request
• UShop replaces all of these
• Eleven of the twelve schools utilize some form of electronic
workflow for procurement, and nine of these use SciQuest.
• SciQuest is used extensively throughout Division 1 schools.
• Ushop is a low risk/high impact project.
• Electronic workflow – Requisitions, PO’s, and Invoices
• Increased velocity and transparency
• Reduction of paper
• Detailed audit trail for all transactions
• Directs spend to existing contracts
• Allows better vendor management and strategic sourcing
• UShop integrated with University electronic approvals
• State of Utah procurement code
• University procurement regulations
• Required approvals for financial transactions
• Accountability for funds
PROCUREMENT PROCESS
SELECT
GOODS
SUBMIT
REQUISITION
ISSUE
PURCHASE
ORDER
FULFILL
ORDER
PROCESS
INVOICE
ISSUE
PAYMENT
OUR GOAL: IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AT EACH STEP OF THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
OUR GOAL: IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AT EACH STEP OF THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
• We have analyzed current state versus UShop
procurement, step by step.
• We have documented both processes.
• When viewed side-by-side, the advantages of UShop,
and the reduced effort and steps are very clear.
PROCUREMENT PROCESS
SELECT
GOODS
SUBMIT
REQUISITION
ISSUE
PURCHASE
ORDER
FULFILL
ORDER
PROCESS
INVOICE
ISSUE
PAYMENT
SHOP FOR ITEMS
SUBMIT REQUISITION FOR APPROVAL
INCLUDING FUNDING DESIGNATION
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
P
A
P
E
R
ISSUE PURCHASE ORDER
ELECTRONIC
• UShop Catalog Suppliers allow us to capture
spend and leverage contracts, plus provide;
• Contract pricing
• E-Invoicing
• Free shipping
• Very easy and positive user experience
• Updated shipping and delivery information
• Biochemistry
• Human Genetics
• Mechanical Engineering
• University Information Technology (UIT)
• 408 Requisitions, totaling $7,675,101
•
•
Positive
•
University financial approvals and routing are integrated
•
Funding sources validated at time of entry
•
Catalog supplier marketplace very easy to use
Areas of concern
•
The availability of preferred suppliers in UShop
•
System provides too many notifications
•
Transparency of the system has revealed some lags both in
individual departments and central administration
•
Need for internal suppliers (e.g. Campus Store)
•
Chemistry
•
Financial & Business Services
•
Human Resources & Payroll
•
Academic Outreach Continuing Education
•
College of Architecture
•
Marriott Library
•
College of Nursing
•
College of Pharmacy
•
University Student Apartments
•
Phase 1 completed
•
Phase 2 – now through August 24
•
•
Onboard and train new departments
•
Increase UShop utilization in Phase 1 departments
•
Collect department feedback and provide support
Phase 3 – September 2015 into 2016
•
Onboard and train new departments
•
Add new functionality, such as internal suppliers
•
Consider large systems, such as Hospital, HCI, Facilities
• Electronic workflow – Requisitions, PO’s, and Invoices
• Ease of use
• Transparent processing
• Reduced paper volume
• Faster processing
• Strategic sourcing
• Data-driven analytics
•
This is a large-scale change management project.
•
A recognition that the current process is very expensive, inefficient, and
does not represent good stewardship of the funds entrusted to the
University.
•
Documented increase in contract compliance and strategic sourcing.
•
UShop must provide fast transaction processing - high velocity.
•
Consistent communication of the benefits of UShop to the departments,
the University, and the suppliers.
•
Demonstrated savings to the institution
Questions?