Presentation Materials

Download Report

Transcript Presentation Materials

Performance Engineered
Concrete Mixtures
Peter Taylor
National Concrete Pavement Technology Center
With thanks to
Jim grove, FHWA, and
Dr Ezgi Yurdakul, Verifi
The Goal
• Help the industry get:
Performance they need
With the materials available
With minimum impact (environment /
cost)
When did you last “design” a
mixture?
• Readymix operator
Some regularly, others never
• Consultant
May review before “approving”
• Owner
Mmm
• Contractor
Only for bidding
• Researchers
Of course!
View Points
• To the readymix operator - Push the
envelope
• To the consultant - Crunch those numbers
• To the contractor - Make it flow, then
magically set
• To the materials
suppliers - Use more
of our stuff
• To the owner
- Make it last forever
Mixture Design
• Process of determining required and
specifiable characteristics of a concrete
mixture:
 i.e. Choosing what you want
5
Mixture Proportioning
• Process of determining the quantities of
concrete ingredients available
 i.e. choosing what to use to get what
you want
6
Design and Proportioning
• Who should choose what?
Strength
Slump
Air content
w/cm
Cement content
SCM percentage
Aggregate grading
Admixture dosage
7
Current Proportioning Technologies
• Developed
Before water reducers
Before supplementary cementitious
materials
• Primarily focused on structural concrete
100 mm (4”) slump
30 MPa (~4000 psi)
• ACI 211 last
revised in 1991
Common Misconceptions
• More cement means stronger concrete
• Supplementary cementitious materials are
dilutants
• Stronger concrete is more brittle & that is bad
• Strength and
workability are
correlated
• Strength and
durability are
correlated
Absolute Volume Approach
• Paste volume based on coarse aggregate
size
• Coarse aggregate volume based on
subtracting the fineness modulus (FM) of
sand from a fudge factor
• Fill the remaining volume
with sand
Absolute Volume Approach
• Higher fineness modulus
Means coarser sand
Therefore more mass needed to fit
between rock particles
Leads to less coarse aggregate
Absolute Volume Approach
• Shortcomings
Little account for:
Supplementary cementitious materials
Admixtures
Aggregate texture
What Do We Really Want
• Contractor
Cost
Workability
Strength
• Owner
Reliability
Value
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Choose the Aggregate System
• Combined gradation
• Determine void ratio
• Account for shape and texture
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Choose the Aggregate System
• Influences
Workability
Segregation
Paste requirement
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Choose a Paste System
• Cementitious blend
• W/Cm
• Air content
• Chemical admixtures
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Choose a Paste System
• Influences
Workability
Setting
Hardened properties
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Choose Paste Volume
• All voids must be filled with paste
• Additional paste to coat the particles
for workability
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Choose Paste Volume
• Influences
Workability
Hardened properties up to a point
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Aggregate
system
Paste
quality
Paste
quantity
• Add something = take something else out
• Interactions
Proposed Mixture Proportioning
Procedure
Are we there yet?
• Aggregate system – some
• Paste quality – mostly
• Paste volume – some
• Interactions – some
• Working on it…
Lets discuss!