Transcript OKLC 2014

Combinatorial knowledge dynamics
and regional development
An explorative case study of food tourism in North
Jutland, Denmark
Laura James – [email protected]
Henrik Halkier– [email protected]
Specialisation or variety?
Combinatorial knowledge dynamics and related variety
From (cumulative) clusters to (combinatorial) related variety
Empirical studies: regions more likely to expand into related activities,
experiencing knowledge spill-overs and growth (Asheim et al. 2011, Frenken
2007)
Regional development platforms
Lahti (Harmaakorpi, 2006), Bavaria, Skåne, Styria (Cooke, 2012), Tuscany
(Lazzeretti, 2010)
Identifying and promoting potential future cross-sectoral synergies
Laura James – [email protected]
Henrik Halkier– [email protected]
Related variety:
From pre-conditions to practices 1
Two streams in the current literature
1. Quantitative studies measuring degrees of variety in regions
(preconditions), correlating these with economic outcomes (e.g.
employment growth)
 Assumption: optimal cognitive distance between sectors
 Close enough for understanding, far enough to learn
2. Qualitative case studies of individual cross-sectoral regional initiatives
 Story-telling around individual cases, focusing on successful
outcomes and so far less detail about process
Laura James – [email protected]
Henrik Halkier– [email protected]
Related variety:
From pre-conditions to practices 2
Is ‘relatedness’ enough?
Process of combination/boundary crossing is often not
straightforward, even within sectors/firms
Knowledge is sticky because it is embedded in practices (e.g.
Carlile 2002, Beckhy 2003)
Assessment of relatedness may not be enough
Successful cross-sectoral innovation requires not just
transfer of knowledge but transformation of existing
practices/creation of new practices
Laura James – [email protected]
Henrik Halkier– [email protected]
CASE STUDY
Food tourism platform in North Jutland
Why?
 Branding, boost local food
production, extend tourist season
Taking a practice perspective
 Key and marginal actors
 Sayings and doings
 Practical concerns
 Temporal organization
Interviews & Observation
 food producers, retailers,
policymakers
Laura James – [email protected]
Henrik Halkier– [email protected]
Feeding Tourists
Food Tourism
Producing Food
Industrial production of
standardized foodstuffs
Maximise profits
[Some small artisan
producers]
Small-scale, traditional,
creative, local
Often ‘lifestyle’
businesses
Retailing
Supermarkets/national
wholesalers
Local food market
Food network to link
producers with
restaurants
Still no joint distribution
Catering
Self-catering (bringing food Signature dishes with
from home)
local ingredients
Occasional eating out
Story-telling menu
Limited seasonality, pre-fab
ingredients
Promoting
Tourism
Summer season
Families
Promotion
Laura James – [email protected]
Henrik Halkier– [email protected]
Branding region with
food
Extended season
Older wealthier couples
Developing initiatives
Key Findings and perspectives




Focus on changing practices of retailing, branding and
promoting
Support for marginalised food production practices,
but small scale
Some practices ‘too difficult’ to change/link together:
buying practices of supermarkets and restaurants
Focus on visible practices & new temporality (outside
main season) rather than localising food chain
 Deeper understanding of processes of knowledge
combination in order to understand difficult/successful
cross-sectoral initiatives
 Not knowledge transfer but transformation of
(knowledgeable) practices
Laura James – [email protected]
Henrik Halkier– [email protected]