Legislative Audit Reports for Fiscal Year 2003

Download Report

Transcript Legislative Audit Reports for Fiscal Year 2003

FY 2003 MnSCU Audits
MnSCU Audit Committee
September 17, 2003
FY 2003 Audit Contract
• 10 College Audits
– Internal Control
– Legal Compliance
• Statewide Assurances
– SCUPPS IT Review
– SEMA4 IT Review
– Certifications
Typical College Audit Scope
• Financial Management
• Tuition and Fees
• Payroll
• Administrative Expenditures
• Auxiliary Enterprises
• Excludes Federal Financial Aid
College Audits/Findings
•
Alexandria (9)
•
North Hennepin (4)
•
Anoka (7)
•
Pine (14)
•
Anoka Ramsey (6)
•
Ridgewater (3)
•
Dakota (5)
•
South Central (0)
•
Lake Superior (7)
•
Saint Paul (12)
College Audit Findings
• 67 Audit Findings
– 25 % decrease from prior audit
• Internal Audit Classification
– 9 Critical
– 35 Important
– 23 Management Discretion
Critical Findings
• Access to Computerized Business
Systems (4 colleges)
–
–
–
–
Cashiering and accounts receivable
Purchasing and accounts payable
Sharing user Ids and passwords
Access unrelated to job duties
• Reconciliations (1 college)
– Resolution of old outstanding items
Critical Findings (continued)
• Collateral (1 college)
– Compliance with statutory requirements
• Revenue and Receivables (2 colleges)
– Monitoring outstanding receivables
– Control over backdated registrations and
tuition deferments
• Study Abroad Program (1 college)
– Collection of travel fees
– Potential conflict of interest
Personnel/Payroll
• SCUPPS
– Salary and work assignments
– Biweekly transactions
– Feed transactions to SEMA4
• SEMA4
–
–
–
–
Fringe benefits
Employee deductions
Checks or bank transfer
Feed transactions to SCUPPS/Accounting
SCUPPS IT Audit
• General Controls
– Relate to all MnSCU business systems
– Focused on “Security”
• Operating system
• Application
• Database
• Application Controls
– SCUPPS processing logic
– Focused on data integrity controls
General Controls – Conclusions
• Application security adequate
• Ongoing concerns with operating
system and database security
• Substantial improvement needed
• Seven findings categorized as critical
Findings
•
No standards or procedures for access
•
Unnecessary and excessive privileges
•
Some programs not properly secured
•
Several users can alter critical data from
uncontrolled environments
•
Ineffective password management
•
Ineffective monitoring of security-related
events
•
Interface files not secured during transmission
Application Controls - Conclusions
• SCUPPS accurately processed data
• Few preventive controls, emphasis on
detective controls
• Three findings, one critical
– Improved monitoring of human resource
transactions entered directly into SEMA4
– Computerized edits could improve data
integrity
– Improved automation for faculty leave