Zinia Sultana,UNHCR: Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours of Rohingya Refugees and Status of Family Planning Services in UNHCR’s Operation in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh
Download ReportTranscript Zinia Sultana,UNHCR: Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours of Rohingya Refugees and Status of Family Planning Services in UNHCR’s Operation in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh
Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours of Rohingya Refugees and Status of Family Planning Services in UNHCR’s Operation in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh Title Dr. Zinia Sultana Reproductive Health Consultant, UNHCR General information • The official two refugee camps are situated in Cox’s Bazar district of Bangladesh. • Total 30,369 Rohingya refugees are residing in KTP and NYP camp. • They are receiving basic services from UNHCR and its partners. • A local NGO (RTMI) provides RH services to the refugees with the support from UNHCR and UNFPA. They receive FP commodities from Government FP department for refugees. . Challenges encountered in provision of FP services in the camps We learnt: • Community is resistant towards contraceptive uptake. • General feeling of hopeless situation. But we identified: • Inadequate support from Government. • Lack of staff to provide the service. • Frequent rupture of stock for FP commodities. • Lack of awareness and information on FP among refugees. Interventions to overcome the situation • Advocacy with Government for integration of the programme with national FP services. • Engage more staff and community volunteers for the programme in camps. • Various FP promotion activities in the community. FP Promotion Activities Awareness session with women at community Couple counseling Awareness session with women at SFC Discussion with community and religious leaders Counseling mother on FP at delivery unit The FP booklet published by Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh How effective were the interventions??? Key Findings from Baseline Study Quantitative method: • CPR for any method is 37.7% and 36.9% for modern method among WRA. (19% in 2009 according to HIS report) • CPR for any method among ever married women is 44%. • Most preferred methods are injectable (57.6%) and OCP (32.9%) among women who are currently using any FP method . Photo: HH survey at NYP camp Key Findings from Baseline Study Quantitative method: Graph 1: Awareness of Family Planning Methods Among Women of Reproductive Age • Ever used FP method is 61.7% among WRA. • 2.4% of women have an unmet need for FP services. • Future intend to use FP methods in next 12 months is 6%. 90.0% Women Who are Aware of Method • Knowledge of ECP and traditional FP methods is very limited. 100.0% 86.6% 81.5% 80.0% 64.9% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 46.2% 42.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 18.5% 5.1% 2.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% Family Planning Method *Percentages may add up to greater than 100% as respondent may give more than 1 response. Key Findings from Baseline Study Qualitative method: • The decision about using FP is generally made by the couple. • Refugees are satisfied with current FP services. • Commodities are free and easily accessible for married couples. • Unmarried adolescents are excluded from the service. Photo: FGD with adolescent boys, KTP camp Key Findings from Baseline Study Qualitative findings • Refugees are aware about advantages of using FP methods. • There is a well functioning referral system to the government FP clinics for long term and permanent methods. • Resistance from the community has been reduced in recent years. • Elderly people still have some misconception and myths related to FP. Photo: FGD with adult women, KTP camp Some thoughts on study findings • Unrealistic unmet need? To get the real unmet need, we may include the women who reported a) about the their plan for next pregnancy as ‘When Allah wants’ b) undecided about next pregnancy c) as currently pregnant or in postpartum and this current pregnancy or last pregnancy was unwanted. • Male sterilization under reported? • Information on sexual activity under reported? Acknowledgement • • • • • • • • • • Nadine Cornier, UNHCR Geneva Herve Isambert, UNHCR Bangkok Mihoko Tanabe, WRC Stacy De Jesus,CDC UNHCR, Cox’s Bazar UNHCR, implementing partners in Cox’s Bazar Research team and data entry staff Community Volunteers Refugee religious and community leaders Women, men, adolescent boys and girls participated in the study