Document 7561182

Download Report

Transcript Document 7561182

CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Update on the CPUC’s Demand
Response and Advanced Metering
Proceedings
Bruce Kaneshiro
Energy Division
California Public Utilities Commission
March 3, 2008
1
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Presentation Outline
• DR Policy, Action Items, Accomplishments
• Advanced Metering Projects
• Rate Cases and Dynamic Pricing
• Demand Response Programs
 Enabling Technologies
 Integration with CAISO’s MRTU
• Forecasting, Measurement and Evaluation Tools
March 3, 2008
2
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Overall DR Policy and Action Items

DR continues to be a high priority energy resource for the state;
second only to Energy Efficiency in the Energy Action Plan’s
‘loading order’

The Energy Action Plan 2008 Update lists several key DR action
items:
• Adopt load management standards to establish a DR infrastructure
• Legislative authorization for time-varying pricing for residential
customers
• More progress on dynamic pricing rate design for all customers.
• Programs that utilize advanced metering, tariffs, and other automated
DR infrastructure.
• Modify retail programs to more fully participate in the CAISO’s
wholesale market structure.
• Develop DR load impact and cost-effectiveness protocols.
March 3, 2008
3
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
DR Accomplishments to Date
 Advanced metering deployment is underway for PG&E and
starting soon for SDG&E
 Default Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) approved for SDG&E’s
large C&I customers
 Peak Time Rebate (PTR) program approved for SDG&E’s
residential customers
 First phase of integrating DR resources with CAISO
operations in place for summer 2008
 Existing DR programs offer a broad range of options for
customers and equate to over 2,000 MWs of DR potential
capacity
 DR qualifies as a resource in meeting a load serving entity’s
Resource Adequacy Requirement.
March 3, 2008
4
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
PG&E’s AMI Project
 In 2006, the CPUC authorized PG&E’s AMI proposal (5.6
million electric meters and 4.5 million gas meters)
 Full deployment of PG&E’s AMI system technology and
network is scheduled to take 5 years (2006-2011).
 As of November 2007, PG&E has installed approximately
243,000 meters (gas and electric), mostly in Bakersfield and
Sacramento.
 In December 2007, PG&E filed a proposal to upgrade its AMI
system:
• Solid state meter technology
• Remote connect/disconnect switches
• Home Area Network Gateway devices
March 3, 2008
5
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
SDG&E’s and SCE’s AMI Project
 In 2007, the CPUC authorized SDG&E’s AMI proposal (1.4 m.
electric meters, 900,000 gas meters)
SDG&E currently finalizing contracts with meter and infrastructure
vendors – will seek Commission approval of the contracts this spring.
• Full deployment of SDG&E’s AMI is expected to be complete by 2011
(deployment expected to begin towards the end of 2008)

 SCE’s AMI proposal (5.3 million electric meters) is currently
under review
• CPUC decision on SCE’s AMI proposal is scheduled for August 2008
 Proposed AMI deployment schedule: 2009 to 2012
March 3, 2008
6
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Rate Cases and Dynamic Pricing
 Dynamic Pricing is being developed by the CPUC in the
utilities’ individual rate design proceedings
 SDG&E’s General Rate Case (GRC). Following rates
approved:

Default Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) for >20 kW customers



Two opt-out windows provided
Bill protection for one year
Capacity Reservation Charge option
• Peak Time Rebate (PTR) program for residential customers




Customer receives an incentive ($ per kWh basis) for the amount of
reduction provided below the customer’s specific baseline during PTR
event hours.
Customer’s baseline: historical usage, adjusted for temperature
Two-tier incentive structure: higher incentive payment for customers who
install demand response technology
SCE’s GRC application will be filed in March 2008
 Default CPP and PTR anticipated in SCE’s filing
March 3, 2008
7
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Rate Cases and Dynamic Pricing

PG&E’s Dynamic Pricing Proceeding:
• Objective: to create a year-by-year strategic work plan that will
direct PG&E to develop and integrate dynamic pricing rates
into PG&E’s rate design for all customers by 2011.
• The strategic work plan should answer three questions:
1) What types of dynamic pricing tariffs should PG&E offer to its
customers?
2) When should PG&E offer each type of dynamic pricing tariffs to
each customer class?
3) How should the dynamic pricing tariffs be designed and
integrated into PG&E’s overall rate design?
March 3, 2008
8
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Rate Cases and Dynamic Pricing
 PG&E’s Dynamic Pricing Proceeding (con’t):
• Highlights from the Draft Timetable for PG&E Rate Proposals:
• Residential Rates:
 If AB1X remains in place: default PTR w/ flat rate or opt-in TOU/CPP in
2010
 Post-AB1X: default TOU-CPP with opt-out to TOU or flat rate (one year
after AB1X ends)
• Small/Medium C&I: default TOU-CPP in 2010 with opt-out to TOU. No flat rate
option
• Large C&I: Choice of TOU-CPP or RTP in 2010, with opt-out to TOU

In 2011, default RTP with opt-out to TOU or CPP
• Small/Medium Agriculture: default TOU in 2010 with opt-out to TOU or flat rate
• Large Agriculture: Choice of CPP or RTP in 2011, with opt-out to TOU
• For more details see Commissioner Chong’s Jan. 23 Ruling:
http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/RULINGS/77986.pdf
March 3, 2008
9
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Demand Response Programs

Utility DR Programs are currently funded on a three-year budget
cycle (’06-’09)

Utility DR portfolio has different triggers (day-of, day-ahead,
emergency), incentive structures (capacity payments, energy
payments or both) and operators (utility or 3rd-party aggregator)

Enabling technologies starting to play a larger role in utility DR
portfolios:
 PG&E AC Cycling Program: customers may opt for the
installation of Programmable Communicating Thermostat
(PCT)
 Auto-DR Program – showing promising results

Future DR programs will need to be aligned with CAISO wholesale
market design
March 3, 2008
10
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
1
Enrolled MWs in Utility Demand Response Programs
July 2003
July 2005
Dec. 2007
5% DR Goal
Emergency-triggered
Programs
1,485 MWs
1,600 MWs
1,800 MWs
N/A
Price-Responsive
Programs
0 MWs
800 MWs
4652-1,125
MWs
2,500 MWs
3
[1] “Upper-bound” estimates except for the 465 MWs referenced by footnote [2].
[2] Represents actual MWs: estimate based on past performance or other methods (no formal method at this
time on how to estimate actual load impacts)
[3] 5% of an assumed 50,000 MWs of system peak demand – illustration purposes only
For more information on CPUC staff’s proposed DR goals for 2009 and beyond
see:http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/RULINGS/73410.pdf
March 3, 2008
11
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Demand Response Programs
 Utilities’ DR portfolio proposals (’09-’11) are due in June 2008:
 CPUC guidance to the utilities for their portfolio included:


Emphasis on alignment with CAISO MRTU framework and
operation

Integration of DR and EE in customer outreach/marketing

Expansion of programs that provide enabling technology: AutoDR
for example

Find ways for customers to participate in both DR incentive
programs and dynamic pricing tariffs without ‘double-dipping’.

Encourages pilot programs that explore new ideas. For example,
DR following intermittent load (renewables)

Criteria by which IOU’s DR portfolio will be evaluated by the
CPUC
For more details see: http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/RULINGS/79323.pdf
March 3, 2008
12
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Forecasting, Measurement and Evaluation Tools




CPUC 2007 DR Rulemaking: Load Impact (LI) Protocol and a CostEffectiveness (CE) Protocol
LI Protocol provides data for:

Long-term planning and Resource Adequacy purposes

Day-to-day operational and procurement needs (CAISO or utility)

Settlement purposes: accurately calculate the load drop to fairly
compensate DR participants
CPUC proposed decision on a LI protocol (for long-term planning
purposes) is expected in the near term.
Outputs from the LI protocol are inputs (benefits) for the CE
Protocol.

CPUC is considering a proposed settlement on a CE protocol in
its rulemaking.

CPUC anticipates that a CE protocol will be in place to evaluate
the utilities’ ’09-’11 DR portfolio proposals
March 3, 2008
13
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop
Contact Information:
Bruce Kaneshiro
Supervisor, Demand Response Programs
California Public Utilities Commission
415.703.1187
[email protected]
March 3, 2008
14