Manpower, Personnel, Training, and Education (MPT&E) Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training 1

Download Report

Transcript Manpower, Personnel, Training, and Education (MPT&E) Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training 1

Manpower, Personnel, Training,
and Education (MPT&E)
CAPT Terry Merritt
850 452- 7163
[email protected]
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
02 OCT 08
1
Overview
 Total Force Enterprise Relationships
 Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training (CNATT)
 Fleet and Total Force Interface
•
Training Model Managers
•
Integrated Production Plan
•
Human Performance Requirement Review Process
•
Navy Credentialing Opportunities On Line (COOL)
 Total Force Readiness Metrics
•
DRSS-N
•
NAE Current Readiness
 On the Horizon
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
2
Navy Enterprises
Operating Concept
Navy
CODB
S&T
Other*
* Other includes Intel, Joint, etc.
** ATL includes PEOs and SYSCOMS
This process addresses the alignment of support enterprise billets and
resources with the warfighting readiness priorities
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
3
NAE ENTERPRISE CFT
NAE Air Board
Air Board
NAE Air Board
EXCOMM
* CNAF
* OPNAV N43
* IRMT
NSAWC
PEO (Carriers)
AIR 1.0
* DC(A), USMC
* OPNAV N88
OPNAV N82
COMFRC
PEO (JSF)
* NAVAIR
* CNAFR
USFF N4/7
PEO (A)
PEO (T)
* CNAL
* TF CFT (CNATRA)
NAVICP
PEO (C4I)
PEO (U&W)
Air Board Extended Members
NAVSEA
CNIC
NSC
MARFORRES
NETWARCOM
DASN-AIR
MARFORPAC
CNETC
DASN-SHIPS
MARFORCOM
SPAWAR
DASN-C4I
CNP
ONR
DSCR
* NAE Air Board EXCOMM
Current Readiness
CFT
Future Capability
CFT
CNAL
OPNAV N88
Readiness,
Standards and Policy
CNAL
Maint and Supply
Chain Management
Total Force
CFT
Int Resource
Mgmt Team
CNATRA
CNAF N8 (Int)
NAVICP / AIR 6.0
Carrier Readiness
Team
CO
CenterCVN
for Naval
Aviation Technical Training
Leadership Group
(DASNs, PEOs, OPNAV)
Future Capability
Working Group
Metrics
Development Team
4
Center for Naval Aviation
Technical Training
 ‘Conglomerate’ product line
•
Wide range course offerings
 Strong Enterprise alignment
 Requirements based on acquisition life cycle planning
•
Position based for weapon system
•
Supports career continuum
 Integrated USN / USMC staff and throughput
 Military Instructors return value to the NAE
•
Reinvest expertise in the fleet upon transfer
•
Maintains health of the community and sea shore rotation
 Changes to Program of Record (POR) from FY07 – FY09
•
NASC transitioned from CNATRA to CNATT in FY07
•
FASO transitioned from CNAF to CNATT in FY08
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
5
CNATT Domain
835 Course
1522 CDP
Brunswick Me
FASO
Whidbey Island
EA6B/P3/CASS
FASO
Swim
Lakehurst NJ
AB
Lemoore
F/A 18
FASO
FMS
Ft Lee VA
Spec Ops PR
TINKER AFB OK
E-6
Athen GA
Maint Logistics
San Diego
North Island
Camp Pendleton
H-60/CASS
H-1
SE
FASO
FASO
Swim
Atsugi
2M
FASO
Meridian MS
AZ
Goodfellow AFB TX
Firefighting
North Carolina
Cherry Pt
New River
AV-8/C130
V22
FASO
H-46/H-53
Keesler AFB MS
AG/Calibration
Kaneohe Bay HA
FASO
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
Hampton Roads
Oceana
Norfolk
F/A-18
H-60/H-53
FMS
E-2
CASS
FASO
Swim
Pensacola FL Milton FL
API, Safety,
AMDO
AVCOT
AOOCP
Aviation A Schools
FMS
Jacksonville FL
H-60/P-3
Support Equip
FASO
FMS
CNATT
6
Business Product Line
Supporting Enterprise
CNATT
N1/NETC/NPDC
Enlisted
13 Navy Ratings
225 NEC
88 USMC MOS
NAE
Officers
Pilot/NFO
Aviation Maintenance Officer
Aviation Ordnance Officer
14 Designators
31 Type Model Series,
FRC’s and Afloat I Level
Business Functions
Individual Training Delivery
Curriculum Management
Content Development
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
Business Product Line
Total Force Personnel
Ready for Tasking
7
Current Operational Environment
CNATT
NAE
NETC/N1
New / Increased Requirements
MQ-8B
NavPlan
2030
F/A-18
F-35
ARC
H-1Y/Z
KC-130J
Instructor s
Trainers (TTE)
TRANET
PCSIM
BRAC
Electronic
Classrooms
Courseware
Multimedia
USMC
ATSP
NKO
H-60S/R
E-2D
ITRO
P-8
RQ7B
EA-18G
CH-53K
MAP
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
8
Key Result Areas
Training Effectiveness
Production Efficiency
Total Force Alignment
Provide training
that is current and
relevant in the
correct amount at
the right time
Provide training
in the most cost
effective and
efficient manner
Right person to the
right job aligned to
Enterprise roles
and responsibilities
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
9
“Work Defines the Work Force”
Technical Training Curriculum
JMETL
Defense Readiness
Reporting System
JTF
NMETL Group
NMETL
Warfare CDR
NMETL
Mission Essential
Systems Matrix
MPT INPUTS TO
TRPPM
CONCEPT
Analysis
KSA
KSA
KSA
Key
Learning
Points
KSA
KSA
KSA
Key
Learning
Points
KSA
KSA
KSA
Key
Learning
Points
KSA
KSA
KSA
ELO
Unit
NMETL
CRITICAL &
FREQUENT
TASKS
ELO
TTL
MASTER
TASK LIST
TRAINING
SYSTEM ACQ
STRATEGY
PLAN
Key
Learning
Points
APPROVED
NTSP
TLO
ELO
ELO
ELO
REFINEMENT
RFP
Training System Development
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
10
Enlisted Training Continuum
Training Design Analysis applied across career continuum
Aviation Technical Training
Completed Training Analysis
A
School
Recruit
Career
T/M/S
CNATT
Initial
T/M/S
CNATT
SEAM
CNATT
QPT
QPT
QPT
Apprentice
Journeyman
Master
In Service Training
In Service Training
In Service Training
Apprentice
E1 - E4
Journeyman
Master
E5 - E6
E7 – E9
“QUALIFIED PROFICIENT AVIATION TECHNICIAN”
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
11
AD Pipeline
Organizational Level Navy
Enlisted Classification
Codes Awarded
Initial Training
AD
Training Track
Career
RECEIVE
SAILOR
FROM
RECRUIT
TRAINING
COMMAND
AD“A” SCHOOL
CORE COMPETENCIES:
C-601-2011(Core)
C-601-2012 or 2013 or
2014(Strand)
NATTC
CNATTU
CNATTU
CNATTU
CNATTU
CNATTU
CNATTU
CNATTU
(36 Days)
LOCATIONS ARE:
NAS PENSACOLA
NAS OCEANA (00KF)
NAS JACKSONVILLE (00KB)
NAS LEMOORE (00KC)
NAS NORFOLK (00KE)
NAS WHIDBEY (00KH)
TINKER AFB (00KG)
NAS NORTH ISLAND (00KD)
Intermediate Level Navy
Enlisted Classification
Codes Awarded
AD “C” SCHOOL
PLATFORM SPECIFIC
NAS OCEANA
F/A-18 PLATFORM
NAS LEMOORE
F/A-18 PLATFORM
TINKER AFB
E-6A PLATFORM
NAS JACKSONVILLE
S-3 P-3 H-60
PLATFORMS
NAS WHIDBEY
EA-6B P-3 PLATFORMS
NAS NORTH ISLAND
H-60 PLATFORM
STUDENT EARNS
THE FOLLOWING
NEC BASED ON
CAREER PATH:
NEC 8805
NEC 8305
C-601-9471
598U
33 Days
C-601-9472
480X
10 Days
NEC 8819
NEC 8319
C-601-1011
579N, 962L
C-601-9533
459N, 486B
26 Days
11 Days
NEC 8832
NEC 8332
C-601-9740
701E
C-601-9741
457H
19 Days
5 Days
NEC 8841
NEC 8341
C-601-9976
283D,401R
C-601-9975
2838,401B
33 Days
33 Days
NEC 8842
NEC 8342
C-601-9973
1181,700J
C-601-9974
1182, 495D
18 Days
4 Days
NEC 8843
NEC 8343
C-601-3500
701A
C-601-3504
454G
32 Days
26 Days
NEC 8878
NEC 8378
C-601-9408
597C, 597D, 7554
C-601-9407
447L, 447M
40 Days
12 Days
NAS NORFOLK
C-2 E-2 H-60 H-53
ARS/AMCM
PLATFORMS
NEC 8312
NEC 8391
C-602-3084
C-601-9448
459R
51 Days
1141,490X,750H
8 Days
NEC 6403
NEC 6416
NEC 6417
A-491-0017
624R
(24 Days)
C-601-3139
455Y
(30 Days)
C-601-3137
4637
(26 Days)
RESERVES
NEC 8313
Alteon Corp, Long Beach
NEC 6418
NEC 6424
NEC 6420
12 Days
C-601-3001
554F, 949G
(46 Days)
C-601-3451
436Y
(19 Days)
C-601-3867
117D, 495K
(26 Days)
NEC 8318
NEC 6423
NEC 6425
C-601-3011
988N
(26 Days)
C-601-4866
436U, 436V
(18 Days)
FLEET
NEC 6426
C-601-3506
447B
57 Days
NEC 8314
R-601-2009,765P
R-601-2017,633K
NEC 8392
C-601-4408
548G, 985E
(31 Days)
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
FLEET
12
Key Training Processes
Fleet Interface
 Training Model Manager (TMM)
 Integrated Production Plan (IPP)
 HPRR Process
 CNATT UNITS / MARUNITS
•
Open House
•
Metrics
•
Commodore Meetings/TRIAD
 Formal Course Review / QPT
 Rating Competency / Occupational Standards
 Advancement Exam Development
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
13
Enterprise Relationships
Navy Total Force
NAE
CNP
Air Board
NETC
Total Force
CFT
CNATT
Requirements
ATB
USMC
ATS/Training Management Teams
(V-22,C-130, H-46, H-1, AV-8, H-53, JSF,
UAS) Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
CNAF
Training Model Managers
(F/A18, P3, H-60, E2/C2, E-6, EA-6B, H-46,
JSF, MH-53)
14
Why Training Model Manager?
 Provide TYCOM current and accurate fleet assessment of
training requirements
 Integrated Production Process (IPP)
 Qualified Proficient Technician (QPT)
 Provides feedback on training effectiveness to ensure
current relevant and complete courseware
 Participate in Formal Course Reviews
 Develop action chits for HPPR process based on Sailor/Marine
performance
 Focuses fleet feedback by TMS for TYCOM action
•
Provides input to Training NARG
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
15
Training Model Managers
 P-3
PATRON THREE ZERO
 F/A-18 C/D
COMSTRKFIGHTWINGLANT
 F/A-18 E/F
COMSTRKFIGHTWINGPAC
 E-6B
COMSTRATCOMMWING ONE
 EA6B
COMVAQWINGPAC
 E2/C2
COMACCLOGWING
 MH-53E
COMHELSEACOMBATWINGLANT
 SH-60B
COMHELMARSTRIKEWINGLANT
 MH-60R/S SH-60F/H
COMHELMARSTRIKEWINGPAC
 C-9 C-40 C-130T
COMFLELOGSUPPWING
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
16
Human Performance
Requirements Process
TMT
F
C
R
READY
TOP 10
SUPV
AMMT
TEST
SURVEY
SURVEY
N
A
L
D
A
CILR
IS
E
PET
ILSMT
OMN
MPN
A
C
Q
PRE/L
P
O
M
APN
CNATT
CNAF
TECOM
NAVAIR
OPNAV
ASL
TRAINING
BARRIERS
FLEET
BARRIERS
PROGRAM
BARRIERS
BUDGET
BARRIERS
PROVIDERS
FLEET
FLEET
REQUIREMENTS
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
RESOURCES
17
Accession Phasing History
 History shows us accessions are phased in a “saw
tooth” manner driven by fiscal constraints



1st trimester shipping constrained
Creates student backlog at “A” Schools post RTC
Flow to fleet affected
Fiscally constrained phasing creates inefficiencies downstream
BOY Historical Accession Phasing by Trimester (FY94-FY08)
Potential Loading Based on Notional Accession Phasing
Annual Accessions
(Active + NAT)
55.00%
60,000
RTC
Summer Surge
14,000
50.00%
50,000
12,000
8,000
20,000
6,000
FEB
JAN
DEC
NOV
OCT
SEP
AUG
MAR
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
JUL
FY08
FY07
FY06
FY05
FY04
FY03
FY02
FY01
FY00
FY99
FY98
FY97
FY96
FY95
0
FY94
15.00%
NOV
2,000
JUN
Trimester Phasing
“Saw Tooth” Phasing
OCT
20.00%
4,000
MAY
10,000
APR
25.00%
MAR
30.00%
30,000
TSC
Surge/Student
Backlog
FEB
35.00%
10,000
JAN
40,000
40.00%
DEC
45.00%
17
STUDENTS
A School Student Phasing
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
USN
USMC
TOTAL
O N D J F M A M J J A S
MONTH
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
19
Supply vs Demand Model
SUPPLY
S-3B TMS
Team
VS “Big Five”
<20% Above
<20% Below
Non-deployed
5
<30% but >20%Above
<30% but >20%Below
Baseline
DEMAND
>30%Above
>30%Below
VS-24 / CAG-8
4
Red Above
3
TOA
SQUADRONS
2
1
RFT is forecast to
remain within 1.0
of Entitlement
0
-1
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
-2
-3
VS-31 below
due to Pre-C2X
-4
-5
TotalCost
% DNE C
120
90M
1.60
80M
1.40
70M
1.20
30
35
30
100
25
80
20
20
60M
1.00
50M
60
15
0.80
40M
30M
20M
10M
Oct
OPA
NMETL
Nov Dec
Jan Feb
Mar
Apr
Ma
Jun
Jul
0.60
ACTUAL
PLAN
0.40
EarnedValue
0.20
SPI
CPI
0.00
Au Sep
10
40
10
5
20
EPA
0
0
0
M A
M
J
J
A
S O
N
D
J
F
M
M
A
J A S O N D J F MA M J J A SO ND J
M J J A S O N D J F M
MAINT M-HR / FLT HR
TRAINED MANPOWER PER
DNEC / MOS
REQN
Health of the Community
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
3
AMD
IPP
Fleet Readiness
20
Integrated Production Plan (IPP)
Demand Based Approach
 Tie accessions to fleet demand
•
Spotlights differences between accession and associated
training output and fleet needs
•
TMS specific production plan
 Highlight disconnects/barriers within the training
pipeline that inhibit fulfilling the demand signal
 Employ IPP generated production plan
•
Basis for CeTARS scheduling
•
Out year POM resource planning
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
21
Demand Planning
AT “O” Comparative Analysis
Source
JAN
2008
FEB
2008
MAR
2008
APR
2008
MAY
2008
JUN
2008
JUL
2008
AUG
2008
SEP
2008
Total
Supply Model
144
144
144
144
144
193
193
193
192
1491
Capacity
82
82
82
82
82
82
117
117
117
843
Demand Model
114
129
116
121
138
160
166
191
150
1285
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
1/08
2/08
3/08
4/08
5/08
6/08
Ent it lement
AI
7/08
8/08
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
9/08
• Supply and demand models not
consistent
• Both models reflect surge
• Capacity does not meet supply
model requirements
• Forces continual rise in students
awaiting instruction
22
CpC Maint Pers
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
23
Maintenance Personnel Rating Fit
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
24
Maintenance Personnel NEC Fit
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
What’s Navy COOL?
 Credentialing Opportunities On-Line (COOL)
•
Find civilian credentials related to your rating, job, or
occupation
•
Understand what it takes to obtain the credentials
•
See if there are available programs that will help pay
credentialing fees
 Chief of Naval Personnel (CNP) authorized appropriated
funds to pay for licensing / certification exams, recertifications, and maintenance fees for Navy and Naval
Reserve service members
•
Authorizes the Navy's Credentials Program Office to a limited
amount of certification / license vouchers that may be used
towards specifically-identified certification / license exams
https:www.cool.navy.mil
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
26
“AM” Navy COOL
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
27
What’s on the Horizon
 Aircrew Rating Merger
 Enlisted Road Maps
 Officer Navy Job Analysis
 Officer Credentialing
 Personnel metrics for DRSS-N
 T & R Matrix for Maintenance Personnel
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
28
Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training
29