School-wide Positive Behavior Supports: Where’s the Analysis? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Feb 17 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.
Download ReportTranscript School-wide Positive Behavior Supports: Where’s the Analysis? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Feb 17 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.
School-wide Positive Behavior Supports: Where’s the Analysis? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Feb 17 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org Alternate Subtitles • “Taking Behavioral Technology to Scale in Schools” • “Supporting Effective Classroom & School Behavioral Organizations” • “Establishing Sustainable Behavioral Capacity” • “Be True to Your School” • “Confessions of a Behavior Analyst” • “What Would Rob Say?” SWPBS Shaping Features ABA Foundations of SWPBS Features of SWPBS Framework Observations & Directions Purpose Context Behavior management is concern in schools Effective applied technology exists Technology is not fully embraced Technology not implemented w/ accuracy, fluency, or durability Longstanding P.S. Challenges Reactive, “gettough” management • Exclusionary consequences • Limited social skills instruction • Not assessment based • Not evidencebased • Label & change kid • Non-data-based decision making • Poor intervention selection • Poor fidelity of implementation • Poor progress monitoring • No datadecision rules • Non-functionbased decisions • Ineffective/Ineff icient organizations • Lack of common language • Limited predictability • Poor outcome indicators • Programmatic discontinuity • Poor resource utilization • Limited conceptual framework • Nonbehavioral • No explanatory mechanism • 6 SWPBS Foundations Colvin, G., & Sugai, G. (1992). School-wide discipline: A behavior instruction model. 1992 Oregon conference monograph. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (1994). Including students with severe behavior problems in general education settings: Assumptions, challenges, and solutions. In J. Marr, G. Sugai, & G. Tindal (Eds.). The Oregon conference monograph (Vol. 6) (pp. 102-120). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. Colvin, G., Kame’enui, E. J., & Sugai, G. (1993). School-wide and classroom management: Reconceptualizing the integration and management of students with behavior problems in general education. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 361-381. Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J. R., Bricker, D., & Kaufman, M. J. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 193-256. Colvin, G., & Sugai, G. (1992). School-wide discipline: A behavior instruction model. 1992 Oregon conference monograph. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. Teach Behavior: Est. Stim Cont School-wide as Context: Org. Beh. Precorrections: Antecedent Manipulations Performance Feedback: Pos. Reinf. Discipline Referrals: Data Dec. Making PROFESSIONAL CHALLENGE: “Being respectful of your mentors” & “Being true to your school….” Direct v. Indirect Measure Technical v. Applied Language Organism v. Organization Science v. Implementation COMPETING CONTINGENCIES Colvin, G., Kame’enui, E. J., & Sugai, G. (1993). School-wide & classroom management: Reconceptualizing the integration & management of students with behavior problems in general education. Education & Treatment of Children, 16, 361-381. “Changing Teacher Behavior is Not Easy” Instruction Approach to Problem Behavior Team-based Action Planning ODR Data Changing Adult Behavior: 3 Guiding Principles for Professional Development 1. “Change is slow, difficult, gradual process for teachers Guskey, 1986, p. 59 2. “Teachers need to receive regular feedback on student learning outcomes” 3. “Continued support & follow-up are necessary after initial training” “Project PREPARE” Challenges Establishing effective leadership behavior (interventionist) Sustaining accurate & fluent intervention implementation Responding to nonresponsive staff behavior Continuous progress monitoring & intervention adjustments Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (1994). Including students with severe behavior problems in general education settings: Assumptions, challenges, and solutions. In J. Marr, G. Sugai, & G. Tindal (Eds.). The OR conference monograph (Vol. 6) (pp. 102-120). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. Behavioral Challenges v. EBD Effective Behavioral Support Educational, Behavioral, & Organizational Capacity All as Foundation for Some Specialized Behavioral Expertise Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J. R., Bricker, D., & Kaufman, M. J. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 193-256. Multi-tiered prevention framework Schools as change agent Universal screening Continuous progress monitoring Priority for evidence-based practices PBS 1980s Positive Behavior Support ABA 1968 Applied Behavior Analysis PBIS 1997 Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports SWPBS SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORTS Converging Influences 1990s Implementation Science RtI 1990s ResponsetoIntervention 15 • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) Positive predictable school-wide Multi-component, climate multi-year schoolfamily-community effort High rates academic & social success VIOLENCE PREVENTION Positive adult role models Formal social skills Positive active instruction supervision & reinforcement SWPBS is Framework for enhancing adoption & implementation of Continuum of evidencebased interventions to achieve Academically & behaviorally important outcomes for All students Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior “Early Triangle” (p. 201) Walker, Knitzer, Reid, et al., CDC CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ALL ~80% of Students Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF CONTINUOUS EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRESS INTERVENTIONS MONITORING UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING CONTENT EXPERTISE & FLUENCY PREVENTION & EARLY INTERVENTION Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 Continuum of Support for ALL Math Intensive Continuum of Support for ALL Science Targeted Spanish Reading Soc skills Universal Soc Studies Basketball Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007 Intensive Anger man. Continuum of Support for ALL Prob Sol. Targeted Ind. play Adult rel. Attend. Universal Coop play Peer interac Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007 ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS ~5% ~15% TERTIARY TERTIARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Function-based support •• Wraparound •• Person-centered planning •• •• SECONDARY SECONDARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Check in/out •• Targeted social skills instruction •• Peer-based supports •• Social skills club •• ~80% of Students PRIMARY PRIMARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Teach SW expectations •• Proactive SW discipline •• Positive reinforcement •• Effective instruction •• Parent engagement •• SWPBS Practices Classroom Non-classroom Student • Smallest # • Evidence-based Family • Biggest, durable effect SCHOOL-WIDE CLASSROOM 1.1. Leadership team 1.All school-wide 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior EVIDENCEBASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidencebased instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, communications, & acknowledgements move, interact) 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as 3.Precorrections & reminders equal partner 4.Positive reinforcement 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources Direct instruction for academic & social behavior ADJUST for Efficiency MONITOR & ACKNOWLEDGE Continuously DEFINE Simply MODEL PRACTICE In Setting Teaching Matrix All Settings Hallways Playgrounds Cafeteria Library/ Compute r Lab Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Study, read, compute. Assembly Bus Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/feet to self. Help/share with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watch. Use appropriate applause. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Respect Property Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriately. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriately. Respect Ourselves Expectations SETTING Teaching directly in context RAH – at Adams City High School (Respect – Achievement – Honor) RAH Classroom Hallway/ Cafeteria Bathrooms Commons Respect Be on time; attend regularly; follow class rules Keep location neat, keep to the right, use appropriate lang., monitor noise level, allow others to pass Put trash in cans, push in your chair, be courteous to all staff and students Keep area clean, put trash in cans, be mindful of others’ personal space, flush toilet Achievement Do your best on all assignments and assessments, take notes, ask questions Keep track of your belongings, monitor time to get to class Check space before you leave, keep track of personal belongings Be a good example to other students, leave the room better than you found it Honor Do your own work; tell the truth Be considerate of yours and others’ personal space Keep your own place in line, maintain personal boundaries Report any graffiti or vandalism RAH – Athletics RAH Practice Competitions Eligibility Lettering Team Travel Respect Listen to coaches directions; push yourself and encourage teammates to excel. Show positive sportsmanship; Solve problems in mature manner; Positive interactions with refs, umps, etc. Show up on time for every practice and competition. Show up on time for every practice and competition; Compete x%. Take care of your own possessions and litter; be where you are directed to be. Achievement Set example in the classroom and in the playing field as a true achiever. Set and reach for both individual and team goals; encourage your teammates. Earn passing grades; Attend school regularly; only excused absences Demonstrate academic excellence. Complete your assignments missed for team travel. Honor Demonstrate good sportsmanship and team spirit. Suit up in clean uniforms; Win with honor and integrity; Represent your school with good conduct. Show team pride in and out of the school. Stay out of trouble – set a good example for others. Suit up for any competitions you are not playing. Show team honor. Remember you are acting on behalf of the school at all times and demonstrate team honor/pride. Cheer for teammates. Typical Contexts/ Routines All Morning Meeting Classroom-Wide Rules/Expectations Respect Others Respect Property Respect Self Use inside voice. Recycle paper. Do your best. Raise hand to Put writing tools inside Ask. answer/talk. desk. Put announcements in Eyes on speaker. Put check by my desk. Give brief answers. announcements. Keep feet on floor. Homework Do own work. Turn in before lesson. Transition Use inside voice. Keep hands to self. “I Need Assistance” Teacher Directed Raise hand or show “Assistance Card”. Wait 2 minutes & try again. Eyes on speaker. Keep hands to self. Independent Work Use inside voice. Keep hands to self. Problem to Solve Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Put homework neatly in Turn in lesson on time. box. Do homework Touch your work only. night/day before. Put/get materials first. Keep hands to self. Have plan. Go directly. Have materials ready. Have plan. Ask if unclear. Use materials as intended. Use materials as intended. Return with done. Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Have plan. Ask. Use time as planned. Ask. Stop, Step Back, Think, Act Family Teaching Matrix Expectations Respect Ourselves Respect Others Respect Property Transfer of stimulus control SETTING At home Morning Routine Homework Meal Times In Car Play Bedtime 4 Data Concerns Student outcomes Practice selection Practice implementation Systems integration PRACTICE “Making a turn” Effective IMPLEMENTATION Effective Not Effective Maximum Student Benefits Not Effective Fixsen & Blase, 2009 35 Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). J. Evid.-based Prac. in Sch. 36 Funding Visibility Political Support Policy LEADERSHIP TEAM (Coordination) Training Coaching Evaluation Local School/District Implementation Demonstrations Behavioral Expertise “Disproportionality “Bullying Behavior” “Culture & Cultural Relevance” Restraint & Seclusion Sustainability & Scaling-up School Improvement & Reform Reconceptualizing Bullying from Behavior Analytic Perspective for SWPBS Emphasize overt observable behavior Consider sets of behavior w/ similar function Examine behavior in context Specific relationship between behavior & context Describe behavioral learning histories Change context to change probability of behavior What is “bullying?” Remember “Label behavior, not people…’ So, say, “bully behavior” Behavior Verbal/physical aggression, intimidation, harassment, teasing, manipulation Why do bully behavior? Get/obtain Escape/avoid E.g., stuff, things, attention, status, money, activity, attention, etc. E.g., same…but less likely Why is “why” important? PREVENTION Teach effective, efficient, relevant alt. SS Remove triggers of BB Add triggers for alt. SS Remove conseq. that maintain BB De-emphasis on adding consequence for problem behavior Add conseq. that maintain SS Target Initiator Continuum of Behavior Fluency Context or Setting Bystander Staff Is Behavior an Issue? Step 1 • Implement SWPBS continuum w/ fidelity • Review SW data at least monthly Step 2 • Modify implementation plan based on data • Implement modifications w/ fidelity Step 3 • Monitor implementation fidelity • Monitor student progress & responsiveness • Modify as indicated by data Implementation must be culturally responsive & shaped Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1-14. www.pbis.org Reconceptualizing Culture from Behavior Analytic Perspective for SWPBS Emphasize overt observable behavior Consider sets of behavior w/ similar function (response class) Examine behavior in context Specific relationship between behavior & context (antecedent & consequence events) Describe behavioral learning histories (stimulus control) Change context to change probability of behavior Culture is the extent to which a group of individuals engage in overt & verbal behavior reflecting shared behavioral learning histories, serving to differentiate the group from other groups, & predicting how individuals within the group act in specific setting conditions. That is, culture reflects a collection of common verbal & overt behaviors that are learned & maintained by a set of similar social & environmental contingencies (i.e., learning history). Emphasis is on applied settings with recognition that group membership is (a) flexible & dynamic, & (b) changed & shaped over time, across generations, & from one setting to another Culturally & contextually relevant is used to describe & consider the unique variables, characteristics, & learning histories of students, educators, & family & community members involved in the implementation of SWPBS. A major assumption is that effective instructional practices & behavior & classroom management strategies exist (Horner, Sugai, & Anderson, 2010), & consideration must be given to culture & context