Transcript Project Management & Technical Board Reports paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report PM & Technical Board Report • Monthly update on Issues - Brief –

Project Management
&
Technical Board
Reports
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
1
PM & Technical Board Report
• Monthly update on Issues - Brief
– Technical Board &Technical Issues from
executive board
– Management Issues…
• Safety Review (proposal)
• Cost & Schedule Review (outcome…)
• Gateway
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
2
Technical Board
– Technical board meets every second week by
phone for ~1hr:
• Alain Blondel, Alan Bross, Paul Drumm,
Yury Ivanyushenkov, Wing Lau, Vittorio Palladino,
Yagmur Torun, Mike Zisman,
– Minutes & other information on the web:
http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/MICE/TechBoard/Index.html
• MICE  Technical Team  Technical Board
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
3
Technical Board Report
Actions + Change Notes:
Proposed design;
Estimated cost;
Responsibility for implementation;
Impact (forces, operation, performance, schedule etc).
e.g.
Radiation shielding between the tracker and the absorber
Magnetic shielding between the solenoid & up/down stream detectors
Connections between the modules
Interlock for RF
Cryocoolers & Helium
Position of diffuser
Changes to sizes of PID detectors
Gap at stage II & fixing to floor.
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
4
In progress…
Reviews
Documents Required
Sequence
Outline designs
Preliminary Hazard
and Operability
Assessments
Working Group
Preliminary Assessments
Hazard and
Operability
Assessment
+
Panel Review
RAL Defined
Review
Proposal for final choice
OK for detailed design
Failure Modes
Stress Calculations
Interlocks &
Operational Procedures
Contingency Plans
Pressure Vessel &
ATEX regulations….
+
Detailed design
OK to Manufacture
Manufacture and installation
ISIS Safety Officer
Permission to operate
MICE Hydrogen Safety Review Procedure
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
5
Proposal for a Design & Safety Review
•
•
The AFCSWG proved to be a successful model - important safety features and risks could be critically
examined.
This experience has been beneficial to MICE
–
–
–
•
motivation and focus
confidence within the collaboration
Confidence at RAL
Sufficient progress has been made to move to the next stage –
–
MICE will expand the scope of the task to include
•
•
•
•
engineering designs and
safety aspects
of all the components of MICE: detectors and cooling channel.
Safety Group core:
–
Engineering:
•
•
Wing Lau
Steve Virostek
–
Cooling Channel:
–
Magnets & Absorber:
•
•
•
Mike Zisman
Elwyn Baynham
Mike Green
–
Integration:
–
Detectors & Electronics:
•
•
–
Yury Ivanyushenkov
Group’s task is
to solicit additional information (papers,
reports, presentations).
to meet as part of the existing AFC
series of meetings to avoid meeting escalation.
It is up to the Convenor to initiate
meetings of one or other of the groups.
Alan Bross
Interlocks:
•
Convenor
“Tom Bradshaw”
The group should consider the design of MICE,
including the beam line & target, and all
infrastructures (shielding, RF power, electrical
power systems, controls etc).
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
6
Charge to the Group
The remit of the group is to:
• Document sufficient design detail and analysis that an assessment of the
design of components against appropriate engineering design rules can
be made.
• Similarly for components in the integrated environment of MICE - this
might examine interconnections, holding of forces, integrated vacuum
systems etc.
• Provide a safety & hazard assessment of the components in the
operational phase; identify procedures, risks, consequences,
identification of fault conditions etc.
• The completed information will be presented to the MICE Executive
Board to gain agreement and will then be subject to an external and
independent review which will inform the Executive Board. The Executive
Board will then take action on the report of the review.
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
7
Cost & Schedule Review
• Two weeks ago Friday 12th November
– All the material supplied is available at:
http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/mice/cost_schedule/Document_List.html
• Review report & Response is also available
– http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/MICE/cost_sc
hedule/Actions%20and%20Response.pdf
• Important input to the Gateway review in two
weeks time!
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
8
Cost & Schedule Review II
• Overall response is positive
– The cost for the muon beam looks reasonable…
…overall the panel believes the team can build
the beamline within the cost envelope proposed.
– Overall the timescale for the beam-line seems to
be achievable if money is available soon.
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
9
Cost & Schedule Review II
– The project does seem to be in very good shape,
and the details of the organization are
impressive. The team have a good control of their
costs, and know where they are.
– However, the 3% inflation on technical equipment
is likely to prove optimistic, and may result in an
overall underestimate of late spend.
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
10
Cost & Schedule Review II
– Risks
• Shutdown & Commissioning of beam line
• Target Design
• RF equipment
– Actions on MICE-UK team:
• Reconsider inflation
• Reconsider commissioning
• Consider outsourcing
– Need for design reviews
• Because we didn’t talk about them,
• But we had been thinking about them…
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
11
Gateway Review
• Gateway Review
– 20th & 21st December
– One day of presentation + next day for
report/questions (TBC)
• Culham, OST, B’ham (JD), RAL (JG)
• KJP, KL, PD + AB, MZ
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
12
What we want…
• Muon Beam On ISIS
• Design Work
– to provide infrastructure
• Put as much in place as possible…
– Safeguard MICE-UK deliverables (Coils)
• R&D
– Hydrogen system
– RF power system
• Tracker for MICE Stage II
• Remind them of
– Focus Coils, RF, Remaining infrastructure etc
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
13
GW Review
• Examines:
– Robust Business Case
– Procurement strategy is robust and appropriate.
– Management & Controls in place
• Monitoring & Performance measures in place
• Risk assessment & management
– Development and delivery plans and
– Funding availability for the whole project.
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
14
Input…
• Building up the document list…
– Gateway 1 Report and the response to recommendations: G1-1(RTR)-R0.4
– Paper submitted to Science Committee. (Note this was in confidence).
– Documents submitted to the MICE Cost & Schedule Review including the
combined Review report and the response from the MICE-UK team.
– Business Case revision X and version submitted to the Gateway 1 review
– MICE Project Specification and detailed MICE-UK Project Specification
– Stakeholder Plan
– Project Management Plan
– Risk Analysis
– MoU Structure
– Spend & Resource Profiles
– MICE WBS Cost spreadsheet
– MICE UK Cost Summary
– Spend to date against Plan + Various Reports…
paul drumm; 1st December 2004; PM&TB Report
15