Transcript Advancing SWPBS in Policy & Practice George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut July 14,

Advancing SWPBS in
Policy & Practice
George Sugai & Rob Horner
OSEP Center on PBIS
Center for Behavioral Education and Research
University of Connecticut
July 14, 2009
www.pbis.org
www.cber.org
www.scalingup.org www.swis.org
[email protected]
Set-up
Sr+ Gina Carlton, Patti Harrison,
Stacy Skalsky, NASP membership
Disclaimer - Not Sch Psych or Policy
Person…..Teacher/Researcher
– Policy enables practice
– Practice informs policy
Handouts & “ppts” = www.pbis.org
Policy
Practice Feedback Loops
Policy
Policy Enabled
Practices
(PEP)
Practice Informed
Policy
(PIP)
Policy (Plan)
Practice (Do)
Fixsen et al. (2005) NIRN. www.scalingup.org
Structure
Procedure
Practice
3+ Policy & Practice
Examples & Considerations
HR 2597
ARRA
SWPBS
Richard’s MESSAGE
Context/culture matters
RtI
HR 2597 May 21, 2009
“Positive Behavior for Safe &
Effective Schools” • ESEA funds for SWPBS
• Provisions
– Professional
development
– Safe & Drug Free
Communities
– Early intervening services
& counseling programs
– Office of specialized
instructional supports
American Recovery &
Reinvestment Act
IDEA & Title Recovery Funds
• Data systems
– E.g., SWIS
• SWPBS implementation, e.g.,
– Early Intervening Services IDEA
– School-wide Programs (ESEA Title I)
– Professional Development (ESEA Title II)
“Response-to-Intervention”
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
UNIVERSAL
SCREENING
CONTINUUM OF
EVIDENCE-BASED
INTERVENTIONS
DATA-BASED
PREVENTION
DECISION MAKING
& EARLY
& PROBLEM
INTERVENTION
SOLVING
CONTINUOUS
PROGRESS
MONITORING
Response to Intervention Framework
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
UNIVERSAL
SCREENING
RtI
CONTINUUM OF
EVIDENCE-BASED
INTERVENTIONS
DATA-BASED
PREVENTION
DECISION MAKING
& EARLY
& PROBLEM
INTERVENTION
SOLVING
CONTINUOUS
PROGRESS
MONITORING
Responsiveness to
Intervention
Social
Sciences
Specials
SWPBS
Etc.
Literacy &
Writing
Numeracy
&
Sciences
Responsiveness to Intervention
Academic Systems
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•High Intensity
Circa 1996
1-5%
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
Universal Interventions
•All students
•Preventive, proactive
Behavioral Systems
80-90%
1-5%
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•Intense, durable procedures
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
80-90%
Universal Interventions
•All settings, all students
•Preventive, proactive
Responsiveness to
Intervention
Academic
+
Social Behavior
MESSAGE
Integrate/braid initiatives
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
FEW
~5%
~15%
SOME
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
ALL
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Intensive
Targeted
Universal
Few
Some
RTI
Continuum of
Support for
ALL
All
MESSAGE
Label behavior…not people
Dec 7, 2007
MESSAGE
Something effective for most
SWPBS is framework for….
Improving
classroom &
school climate
Integrating
Decreasing
academic &
reactive
behavior
management
initiatives
Improving
support for
students w/
EBD
Maximizing
academic
achievement
SWPBS
Approach for
operationalizing
best practice
Supporting Social Competence &
Academic Achievement
OUTCOMES
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
PRACTICES
MESSAGE
Supporting
Support Implementers
Student Behavior
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
• Positive, predictable school-wide
climate
• Surgeon General’s
Report on Youth
Violence (2001)
• High rates of academic & social
success
• Coordinated Social
Emotional &
Learning
(Greenberg et al.,
2003)
• Formal social skills instruction
• Positive active supervision &
reinforcement
• Center for Study &
Prevention of
Violence (2006)
• Positive adult role models
• White House
Conference on
School Violence
(2006)
• Multi-component, multi-year
school-family-community effort
Effective Academic
Instruction
Effective Behavioral
Interventions
=
Continuous & Efficient Databased Decision Making
Systems for Durable &
Accurate Implementation
POSITIVE,
PREVENTIVE
SCHOOL
CULTURE
(SWPBS)
ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS
~5%
~15%
TERTIARY
PREVENTION
TERTIARY
PREVENTION
•• Function-based support
•• Wraparound
•• Person-centered planning
••
••
SECONDARY
PREVENTION
SECONDARY
PREVENTION
•• Check in/out
•• Targeted social skills instruction
•• Peer-based supports
•• Social skills club
••
PRIMARY
PREVENTION
PRIMARY
PREVENTION
•• Teach SW expectations
•• Proactive SW discipline
•• Positive
reinforcement
MESSAGE
•• Effective instruction
•• Parent engagement
••
Logically linked interventions
~80% of Students
SWPBS
Practices
Classroom
Non-classroom
• Smallest #
• Evidence-based
Family
• Biggest, durable effect
Student
MESSAGE
Efficiency, effectiveness, relevance
School-wide
1. Leadership team
2. Behavior purpose statement
3. Set of positive expectations & behaviors
4. Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide
expected behavior
5. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected
behavior
6. Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule
violations
7. Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring &
evaluation
Non-classroom
• Positive expectations & routines
taught & encouraged
• Active supervision by all staff
– Scan, move, interact
• Precorrections & reminders
• Positive reinforcement
Non-Classroom Management: Self-Assessment
Name______________________________
Date_____________
Setting □ Hallway □ Entrance □ Cafeteria
□ Playground □ Other_______________
Time Start_________
Time End _________
Tally each Positive Student Contacts
Total #
Tally each Negative Student Contacts
Total #
Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____: 1
1. Did I have at least 4 positive for 1 negative student contacts?
Yes
No
2. Did I move throughout the area I was supervising?
Yes
No
3. Did I frequently scan the area I was supervising?
Yes
No
4. Did I positively interact with most of the students in the area?
Yes
No
5. Did I handle most minor rule violations quickly and quietly?
Yes
No
6. Did I follow school procedures for handling major rule violations?
Yes
No
7. Do I know our school-wide expectations (positively stated rules)?
Yes
No
8. Did I positively acknowledge at least 5 different students for
displaying our school-wide expectations?
Yes
No
Overall active supervision score:
7-8 “yes” = “Super Supervision”
5-6 “yes” = “So-So Supervision”
MESSAGE
Train in context
<5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed”
# Yes______
Classroom
• All school-wide
• Maximum structure & predictability in routines &
environment
• Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed,
prompted, & supervised.
• Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities
to respond, delivery of evidence-based instructional
curriculum & practices
• Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of
appropriate behavior, including contingent & specific
praise, group contingencies, behavior contracts, token
economies
• Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate
behavior, including specific, contingent, brief corrections
for academic & social behavior errors, differential
reinforcement of other behavior, planned ignoring,
response cost, & timeout.
Classroom Management: Self-Assessment
Teacher__________________________
Rater_______________________
Date___________
Instructional Activity
Time Start_______
Time End________
Tally each Positive Student
Contacts
Total #
Tally each Negative
Student Contacts
Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____ to 1
Total #
Classroom Management Practice
Rating
1.
I have arranged my classroom to minimize crowding and distraction
Yes
No
2.
I have maximized structure and predictability in my classroom (e.g., explicit classroom
routines, specific directions, etc.).
Yes
No
3.
I have posted, taught, reviewed, and reinforced 3-5 positively stated expectations (or rules).
Yes
No
4.
I provided more frequent acknowledgement for appropriate behaviors than inappropriate
behaviors (See top of page).
Yes
No
5.
I provided each student with multiple opportunities to respond and participate during
instruction.
Yes
No
6.
My instruction actively engaged students in observable ways (e.g., writing, verbalizing)
Yes
No
7.
I actively supervised my classroom (e.g., moving, scanning) during instruction.
Yes
No
8.
I ignored or provided quick, direct, explicit reprimands/redirections in response to
inappropriate behavior.
Yes
No
9.
I have multiple strategies/systems in place to acknowledge appropriate behavior (e.g.,
class point systems, praise, etc.).
Yes
No
Yes
No
10. In general, I have provided specific feedback in response to social and academic behavior
errors and correct responses.
Overall classroom management score:
10-8 “yes” = “Super”
7-5 “yes” = “So-So”
# Yes___
<5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed”
Individual Student
• Behavioral competence at school & district
levels
• Function-based behavior support planning
• Team- & data-based decision making
• Comprehensive person-centered planning &
wraparound processes
• Targeted social skills & self-management
instruction
• Individualized instructional & curricular
accommodations
Family
• Continuum of positive behavior support for
all families
• Frequent, regular positive contacts,
communications, & acknowledgements
• Formal & active participation & involvement
as equal partner
• Access to system of integrated school &
community resources
GENERAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS
Team
Agreements
• Readiness agreements, prioritization, &
investments
• 3-4 year implementation
commitment
Data-based
Action
Plan
• Local capacity for
training,
coordination,
coaching, & evaluation
• Systems for implementation integrity
Evaluation
MESSAGE
Implementation
Build local implementation capacities
MESSAGE
Do “it” with others.
Sample Teaming Matrix
Initiative,
Committee
Purpose
Outcome
Target
Group
Staff
Involved
SIP/SID
Attendance
Committee
Increase
attendance
Increase % of
students attending
daily
All students
Eric, Ellen,
Marlee
Goal #2
Character
Education
Improve
character
Improve character
All students
Marlee, J.S.,
Ellen
Goal #3
Safety
Committee
Improve safety
Predictable response
to threat/crisis
Dangerous
students
Has not met
Goal #3
School Spirit
Committee
Enhance school
spirit
Improve morale
All students
Has not met
Discipline
Committee
Improve behavior
Decrease office
referrals
Bullies,
antisocial
students,
repeat
offenders
Ellen, Eric,
Marlee, Otis
DARE
Committee
Prevent drug use
High/at-risk
drug users
Don
EBS Work Group
Implement 3-tier
model
All students
Eric, Ellen,
Marlee, Otis,
Emma
Decrease office
referrals, increase
attendance, enhance
academic
engagement, improve
grades
MESSAGE
Goal #3
Goal #2
Goal #3
Make decisions for working smarter
Teaching Academics &
Behaviors
ADJUST for
Efficiency
MONITOR &
ACKNOWLEDGE
Continuously
DEFINE
Simply
MODEL
PRACTICE
In Setting
MESSAGE
Behavior is a behavior.
Expectations
Teaching
Matrix
SETTING
All
Settings
Hallways
Playgrounds
Cafeteria
Library/
Compute
r Lab
Study,
read,
compute.
Sit in one
spot.
Watch for
your stop.
Assembly
Bus
Respect
Ourselves
Be on task.
Give your
best effort.
Be
prepared.
Walk.
Have a plan.
Eat all your
food.
Select
healthy
foods.
Respect
Others
Be kind.
Hands/feet
to self.
Help/share
with
others.
Use normal
voice
volume.
Walk to
right.
Play safe.
Include
others.
Share
equipment.
Practice
good table
manners
Whisper.
Return
books.
Listen/watch.
Use
appropriate
applause.
Use a quiet
voice.
Stay in your
seat.
Respect
Property
Recycle.
Clean up
after self.
Pick up
litter.
Maintain
physical
space.
Use
equipment
properly.
Put litter in
garbage can.
Replace
trays &
utensils.
Clean up
eating area.
Push in
chairs.
Treat
books
carefully.
Pick up.
Treat chairs
appropriately.
Wipe your
feet.
Sit
appropriately.
MESSAGE
Defendable & efficient
Typical Contexts/
Routines
All
Morning Meeting
Classroom-Wide Rules/Expectations
Respect Others
Respect Property
Respect Self
Use inside voice.
Recycle paper.
Do your best.
Raise hand to
Put writing tools inside
Ask.
answer/talk.
desk.
Put announcements in
Eyes on speaker.
Put check by my
desk.
Give brief answers.
announcements.
Keep feet on floor.
Homework
Do own work.
Turn in before lesson.
Transition
Use inside voice.
Keep hands to self.
“I Need
Assistance”
Teacher Directed
Raise hand or show
“Assistance Card”.
Wait 2 minutes & try
again.
Eyes on speaker.
Keep hands to self.
Independent Work
Use inside voice.
Keep hands to self.
Problem to Solve
Stop, Step Back,
Think, Act
Put homework neatly in Turn in lesson on time.
box.
Do homework
Touch your work only.
night/day before.
Put/get materials first.
Keep hands to self.
Have plan.
Go directly.
Have materials ready.
Have plan.
Ask if unclear.
Use materials as
intended.
Use materials as
intended.
Return with done.
Stop, Step Back,
Think, Act
Have plan.
Ask.
Use time as planned.
Ask.
Stop, Step Back,
Think, Act
Family
Teaching
Matrix
Expectations
Respect
Ourselves
Respect
Others
Respect
Property
SETTING
At home
Morning
Routine
Homework
Meal
Times
In Car
Play
Bedtime
www.pbis.org
Horner, R., & Sugai, G. (2008). Is
school-wide positive behavior support
an evidence-based practice? OSEP
Technical Assistance Center on
Positive Behavioral Interventions and
Support.
www.pbis.org
click “Research”
MESSAGE“Evidence Base”
Know your evidentiary support
90-School Study
Horner et al., in press
• Schools that receive technical assistance from
typical support personnel implement SWPBS
with fidelity
• Fidelity SWPBS is associated with
▫ Low levels of ODR
▫ .29/100/day v. national mean .34
▫ Improved perception of safety of the school
▫ reduced risk factor
▫ Increased proportion of 3rd graders who meet state
reading standard.
Project Target: Preliminary Findings
Bradshaw & Leaf, in press
• PBIS (21 v. 16) schools reached & sustained high
fidelity
• PBIS increased all aspects of organizational health
• Positive effects/trends for student outcomes
– Fewer students with 1 or more ODRs (majors + minors)
– Fewer ODRs (majors + minors)
– Fewer ODRs for truancy
– Fewer suspensions
– Increasing trend in % of students scoring in advanced &
proficient range of state achievement test
7 BIG
BEHAVIOR
IDEAS!!
1 Prevent & precorrect
2 Trigger, teach, reinforce
3 Invest in evidence-based
4 Consider culture/context
5 Implement with fidelity
6 Decide w/ data
7 Establish efficient systems capacity
PBS Systems Implementation Logic
Funding
Visibility
Political
Support
Leadership Team
Active & Integrated Coordination
Training
Coaching
Evaluation
Local School Teams/Demonstrations
www.pbis.org “PBS Implementation Blueprint”
School Psychology et al.
Effective
• Research-based?
Efficient
• Doable?
Relevant
• Contextual & Cultural?
Durable
• Lasting?
Scalable
• Transportable?
SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS
THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION
Continuous
Self-Assessment
Relevance
Valued
Outcomes
Priority
Efficacy
Fidelity
Practice
Implementation
Effective
Practices
Effective Social & Academic
School Culture
Common
Language
SWPBS
Common
Experience
Common
Vision/Values