IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
Download ReportTranscript IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut August 4, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org [email protected] BIG IDEAS • Long history of effective behavioral interventions exists • PBIS practices & systems related to improved academic & social behavior outcomes • Accurate implementation possible by real implementers Optimism • National priority & visibility • Research-based practices & policy • Guided systemic implementation sustainability & scaling • Continuous research & technical assistance Basics: 4 PBS Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior PBS Systems Implementation Logic Funding Visibility Political Support Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION Continuous Self-Assessment Relevance Valued Outcomes Priority Efficacy Fidelity Practice Implementation Effective Practices VIOLENCE PREVENTION? • Positive, predictable school-wide climate • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Formal social skills instruction • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Positive active supervision & reinforcement • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • Positive adult role models • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) • High rates of academic & social success • Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort 90-School Study Horner et al., in press • Schools that receive technical assistance from typical support personnel implement SWPBS with fidelity • Fidelity SWPBS is associated with ▫ Low levels of ODR ▫ .29/100/day v. national mean .34 ▫ Improved perception of safety of the school ▫ reduced risk factor ▫ Increased proportion of 3rd graders who meet state reading standard. Project Target: Preliminary Findings Bradshaw & Leaf, in press • PBIS (21 v. 16) schools reached & sustained high fidelity • PBIS increased all aspects of organizational health • Positive effects/trends for student outcomes – Fewer students with 1 or more ODRs (majors + minors) – Fewer ODRs (majors + minors) – Fewer ODRs for truancy – Fewer suspensions – Increasing trend in % of students scoring in advanced & proficient range of state achievement test Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive Behavioral Systems 80-90% 1-5% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING STUDENT & PROBLEM PERFORMANCE SOLVING CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING RtI: Good “IDEiA” Policy Approach or framework for redesigning & establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators • NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention • NOT limited to special education • NOT new Quotable Fixsen • “Policy is – Allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs” – Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action” • “Training does not predict action” – “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications” Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 RTI Continuum of Support for ALL RtI Application Examples EARLY READING/LITERACY SOCIAL BEHAVIOR TEAM General educator, special educator, reading specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. General educator, special educator, behavior specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. UNIVERSAL SCREENING Curriculum based measurement SSBD, record review, gating PROGRESS MONITORING Curriculum based measurement ODR, suspensions, behavior incidents, precision teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS 5-specific reading skills: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension Direct social skills instruction, positive reinforcement, token economy, active supervision, behavioral contracting, group contingency management, function-based support, selfmanagement DECISION MAKING RULES Core, strategic, intensive Primary, secondary, tertiary tiers CONTINUUM of SWPBS TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound/PCP Audit • Special Education ~5%• 1. Identify existing practices • ~15% • • • • • by tier 2. Specify outcome for each effort SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out 3. Evaluate implementation Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports accuracy & outcome Social skills club effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on PRIMARY4. PREVENTION • Teach & encourage positive outcomes SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline 5. Establish decision rules (RtI) • Effective instruction • Parent engagement • ~80% of Students National ODR/ISS/OSS July 2008 K-6 6-9 9-12 2409 # Sch 1756 476 177 # Std 781,546 311,725 161,182 1,254,453 # ODR 423,647 414,716 235,279 1,073,642 ISS # Evnt 6 38 38 avg/100 # Day 12 49 61 OSS # Evnt 6 30 24 avg/100 # Day 10 74 61 # Expl 0.03 0.29 0.39 SWIS summary 07-08 July 2, 2008 2,717 sch, 1,377,989 stds; 1,232,826 Maj ODRs Grade Range # Schools Mean Enroll. Mean ODRs/100/ sch day (std dev.) K-6 1,756 445 ..35 (.45) 1/300 day 6-9 476 654 .91 (1.40) 1/100 /day 9-12 177 910 1.05 (1.56) 1/105/day K-(8-12) 308 401 1.01 (1.88) 1/100 /day % Students 3 100% 8 9 15 16 8 90% 80% 70% 60% 6+ 50% 2-5 89 77 40% 0-1 74 30% 20% 10% 0% K-6 6-9 School Level July 2, 2008 9-12 % Major ODRs 100% 90% 33 45 80% 44 70% 60% 6+ 50% 42 2-5 0-1 40% 38 38 17 18 30% 20% 26 10% 0% K-6 6-9 School Level July 2, 2008 9-12 District Office Discipline Referrals 2001-2008 1000 900 800 Number of Referrals 700 600 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 500 2004-05 2005-06 400 2006-07 2007-08 300 200 100 0 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade Level 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sustaining Change • Know your basics • Implement with fidelity • Give priority to what matters • Know your outcomes • Integrate for efficiency • Build durable capacity Summary Notes • Demonstrations – Implementation sustainability – Formalizing family engagement & support – Sustainability involves recognition – Measurable definitions to enable evaluation of time use • Tertiary Demonstrations Interagency – Establishing demos – Specific direction for multiple players/sites – Work w/ existing structures/resources • School/Family/Community Partnerships - Engagement – Driven by stakeholders – Self-assessment & existing structures – Thinking long term with measurable benchmarks • Fiscal – Implementation costs – Enhancements for ease of use – Retest before distribution – Cost data summaries are useful • Related Initiatives - Coaching – Identify what exists & common ground (SIP) – Integrate around outcomes & need data – Generic functions • Political Support/Visibility – National legislation – Nonpartisan approach – Promoting policy through best practice & examples – Targeting small # of powerful influential advocacy groups Overall • “Working Smarter” – Is “it”…. – Effective – Efficient – Relevant – Durable – Scalable • RtI as umbrella for academic & behavior • Integration for predictability, efficiency, & continuous regeneration • Family engagement metric & continuum of evidence-based practices (RtI)….metric directly outcome linked • Model/demonstrate before promoting • Research-Practice-Policy • Precorrect-prevent, teach, acknowledge, & reinforce at systems level Organization Common Vision ORGANIZATION MEMBERS Common Experience Common Language Sr+ • Striving for common vision, language, & routine • Using data & outcome driven decisions • Sticking w/ what works • Modeling what you want to see • Acknowledging & showcasing accomplishments • Staying connected to student outcomes