Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Sep 22 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.
Download ReportTranscript Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Sep 22 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Sep 22 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org My Worry “Teaching” by Getting Tough Runyon: “I hate this f____ing school, & you’re a dumbf_____.” Teacher: “That is disrespectful language. I’m sending you to the office so you’ll learn never to say those words again….starting now!” Immediate & seductive solution….”Get Tough!” • Clamp down & increase monitoring • Re-re-re-review rules • Extend continuum & consistency of consequences • Establish “bottom line” ...Predictable individual response Reactive responses are predictable…. When we experience aversive situation, we want select interventions that produce immediate relief – Remove student – Remove ourselves – Modify physical environment – Assign responsibility for change to student &/or others When behavior doesn’t improve, we “Get Tougher!” • Zero tolerance policies • Increased surveillance • Increased suspension & expulsion • In-service training by expert • Alternative programming …..Predictable systems response! Erroneous assumption that student… • Is inherently “bad” • Will learn more appropriate behavior through increased use of “aversives” • Will be better tomorrow……. But….false sense of safety/security! • Fosters environments of control • Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior • Shifts accountability away from school • Devalues child-adult relationship • Weakens relationship between academic & social behavior programming Science of behavior has taught us that students…. • Are NOT born with “bad behaviors” • Do NOT learn when presented contingent aversive consequences ……..Do learn better ways of behaving by being taught directly & receiving positive feedback VIOLENCE PREVENTION • Positive, predictable school-wide climate • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • High rates of academic & social success • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Formal social skills instruction • Positive active supervision & reinforcement • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • Positive adult role models • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) • Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort 9 SWPBS is Framework for enhancing adoption & implementation of Continuum of evidencebased interventions to achieve Academically & behaviorally important outcomes for All students 12 Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior 13 Stolen w/ permission from MN Jan 28, 2010 Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement PRACTICES Evidence-based, preventive DATA Supporting Decision Making SYSTEMS Supporting Staff Behavior & Implementation Fidelity 14 CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% ~15% SOME Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ALL ~80% of Students 15 IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF CONTINUOUS EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRESS INTERVENTIONS MONITORING UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING CONTENT EXPERTISE & FLUENCY PREVENTION & EARLY INTERVENTION 16 Responsiveness to Intervention Social Sciences Specials SWPBS Etc. Literacy & Writing Numeracy & Sciences Responsiveness to Intervention Academic Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity Circa 1996 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive Behavioral Systems 80-90% 1-5% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive 18 Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Math Intensive Continuum of Support for ALL Science Targeted Spanish Reading Soc skills Universal Soc Studies Basketball Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007 20 Intensive Anger man. Continuum of Support for ALL Prob Sol. Targeted Ind. play Adult rel. Attend. Universal Coop play Peer interac Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007 21 ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS ~5% ~15% TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound • Person-centered planning • • SECONDARY PREVENTION • Check in/out • Targeted social skills instruction • Peer-based supports • Social skills club • ~80% of Students PRIMARY PREVENTION • Teach SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline • Positive reinforcement • Effective instruction • Parent engagement • SWPBS Practices Classroom Non-classroom • Smallest # • Evidence-based Family • Biggest, durable effect Student 23 “Is SWPBS evidencebased practice?” Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (in press). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality. www.pbis.org 24 SCHOOL-WIDE CLASSROOM 1.Leadership team 1.All school-wide 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior EVIDENCEBASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidencebased instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, communications, & acknowledgements move, interact) 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as 3.Precorrections & reminders equal partner 4.Positive reinforcement 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources 25 GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started” Team Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation 26 Funding Visibility Political Support Policy SWPBS Implementation LEADERSHIP TEAM Blueprint (Coordination) www.pbis.org Training Coaching Evaluation Local School/District Implementation Demonstrations Behavioral Expertise 27 Expectations Teaching Matrix SETTING All Settings Hallways Playgrounds Cafeteria Library/ Compute r Lab Study, read, compute. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Assembly Bus Respect Ourselves Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk. Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/feet to self. Help/share with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watch. Use appropriate applause. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Respect Property Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriately. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriately. Family Teaching Matrix SETTING At home Morning Routine Homework Meal Times In Car Play Bedtime Expectations Respect Ourselves Respect Others Respect Property 29 FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals SUSTAINED IMPACT Pre 3000 Sustained impact is real success Total ODRs 2500 2000 Post 1500 1000 500 0 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 Academic Years 30 ODR Admin. Benefit Springfield MS, MD Increased 2001-2002 minutes for administrators 2002-2003 be instructional leaders 2277 1322 = 955 42% improvement = 14,325 min. @15 min. = 238.75 hrs = 40 days Admin. time 31 ODR Instruc. Benefit Springfield MS, MD Increased minutes for 2001-2002 academic engagement & 2002-2003 opportunities to respond 2277 1322 = 955 42% improvement = 42,975 min. @ 45 min. = 716.25 hrs = 119 days Instruc. time 32 Proportion of Students Meeting State Academic EOG Reading Standard Bob Algozzine NC Positive Behavior Support Initiative 100 95 90 85 80 75 Schools w/ Low ODRs & High Academic Outcomes Reading Линейная (Reading) 70 rxy = -.44 (n = 36) 65 60 55 50 0,00 0,10 0,20 0,30 0,40 0,50 ODRs 0,60 0,70 0,80 0,90 1,00 Office Discipline Referrals per 100 Students PBIS in North Carolina Elementary School Suspension Rate PBIS in Virginia 34 Elementary School Improvements in behavior can be associated with improvements in academic outcomes PBIS in Virginia 35 Decreasing high risk behavior by using evidence-based curriculum (RtI) 36 PBIS in Vermont Central Illinois Elem, Middle Schools Triangle Summary 03-04 1 05% Mean Proportion of Students 11% 20% 0.8 22% 0.6 84% 58% 0.4 6+ ODR 2-5 ODR 0-1 ODR 0.2 0 Met SET (N = 23) Not Met SET (N =12) 37 Effective Social & Academic School Culture Effective Practice Common Language Kids Benefit Common Experience Common Vision/Values