Transcript Project Hi’ilani PBS Team Follow-up George Sugai Center on Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports www.pbis.org May 6, 2008

Project Hi’ilani
PBS Team Follow-up
George Sugai
Center on Positive Behavior
Interventions & Supports
www.pbis.org
May 6, 2008
Main Topics
• SW Positive Behavior Support
• Non Classroom Settings
• Classroom Management
• Noncompliance & Escalations
• Targeted Interventions
• Action Planning
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT
PREVENTING VIOLENCE?
• Positive, predictable school-wide
climate
• Surgeon General’s
Report on Youth
Violence (2001)
• Formal social skills instruction
• Coordinated Social
Emotional &
Learning
(Greenberg et al.,
2003)
• Positive active supervision &
reinforcement
• Center for Study &
Prevention of
Violence (2006)
• Positive adult role models
• White House
Conference on
School Violence
(2006)
• High rates of academic & social
success
• Multi-component, multi-year
school-family-community effort
Positive
Behavior
Support
Social Competence &
Academic Achievement
OUTCOMES
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
PRACTICES
Supporting
Student Behavior
GENERAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS:
“Getting Started”
Team
Agreements
Data-based
Action Plan
Evaluation
Implementation
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
~5%
~15%
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Intensive
Targeted
Universal
Few
Some
All
Dec 7, 2007
RTI
Continuum of
Support for
ALL
FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals
SUSTAINED IMPACT
Pre
3000
Total ODRs
2500
2000
Post
1500
1000
500
0
94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Academic Years
Mean ODRs per 100 students per school day
Illinois and Hawaii Elementary Schools 2003-04 (No Minors)
1 Schools doing SW-PBS well report a 25% lower
Mean ODR/100/Day
rate of ODRs
0.8
0.6
0.4
.85
.64
0.2
0
N = 87
N = 53
Met SET 80/80
Did Not Meet SET
Illinois 02-03 Mean Proportion of Students Meeting ISAT Reading
Mean Percentage of 3rd graders
meeting ISAT Reading Standard
Standard
t test (df 119) p < .0001
70%
62.19%
60%
50%
46.60%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
PBIS NOT in place N = 69
PBIS IN place N = 52
Proportion of Students Meeting
Reading Standards
Proportion of 3rd Graders who meet or exceed state
reading standards (ISAT) in Illinois schools 02-03
t = 9.20; df = 27 p < .0001
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
NN= =23
23
0
Not Meeting SET
NN==8
8
Meeting SET
Central Illinois Elem, Middle Schools
Triangle Summary 03-04
1
05%
Mean Proportion of
Students
11%
20%
0.8
22%
0.6
84%
58%
0.4
0.2
6+ ODR
2-5 ODR
0-1 ODR
SWPBS schools are more preventive
0
Met SET (N = 23)
Not Met SET (N =12)
North Illinois Schools (Elem, Middle)
Triangle Summary 03-04
Mean Proportion of
Students
1
0.8
04%
08%
14%
17%
0.6
88%
69%
0.4
0.2
6+ ODR
2-5 ODR
0-1 ODR
SWPBS schools are more preventive
0
Met SET N = 28
Not Met SET N = 11
Major Office Discipline Referrals (05-06)
Mean Proportion of Students
0-1
'2-5
'6+
100%
90%
3%
8%
10%
11%
16%
18%
89%
74%
71%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
ODR rates vary by level
10%
0%
K=6 (N = 1010)
6-9 (N = 312)
9-12 (N = 104)
Major Office Discipline Referrals (05-06)
Percentage of ODRs by Student Group
'0-1
'2-5
'6+
A few kids get many ODRs
100%
90%
32%
48%
45%
43%
37%
40%
25%
15%
15%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
K-6 (N = 1010)
6-9 (N = 312)
9-12 (N = 104)
Bethel School District
ODR's by Grade Level
900
800
700
Number of ODR's
600
2001-02
500
2002-03
2003-04
400
2004-05
300
200
100
0
K
1
2
3
4
5
6
Grade Level
7
8
9
10
11
12
SWPBS
Subsystems
Classroom
Family
Non-classroom
Student
School-wide
1. Common purpose & approach to discipline
2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors
3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior
4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging
expected behavior
5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging
inappropriate behavior
6. Procedures for on-going monitoring &
evaluation
Few positive SW expectations defined,
taught, & encouraged
Teaching Matrix Activity
Classroom
Respect
Others
• Use inside
Respect
Environment
& Property
• Recycle
Respect
Yourself
• Do your best
•__________
Respect
Learning
voice
• ________
paper
•_________
• Have
materials
ready
•__________
Lunchroom
Bus
• Eat your own
• Stay in your
food
•__________
• Return trays
•__________
• Wash your
hands
•__________
• Eat balanced
diet
•__________
seat
•_________
Hallway
• Stay to right
• _________
Assembly
• Arrive on
time to
speaker
•__________
• Keep feet on
• Put trash in
• Take litter
• Be at stop on
• Use your
• Listen to
floor
•__________
time
•__________
• Go directly
from bus to
class
•__________
cans
•_________
words
•__________
• Go directly
to class
•__________
with you
•__________
speaker
•__________
• Discuss topic
in class w/
others
•__________
Acknowledge & Recognize
Reinforcement Wisdom!
• “Knowing” or saying “know” does
NOT mean “will do”
• Students “do more” when “doing
works”…appropriate & inappropriate!
• Natural consequences are varied,
unpredictable, undependable,…not
always preventive
Individual Student
• Behavioral competence at school & district
levels
• Function-based behavior support planning
• Team- & data-based decision making
• Comprehensive person-centered planning &
wraparound processes
• Targeted social skills & self-management
instruction
• Individualized instructional & curricular
accommodations
Family
• Continuum of positive behavior support for
all families
• Frequent, regular positive contacts,
communications, & acknowledgements
• Formal & active participation & involvement
as equal partner
• Access to system of integrated school &
community resources
Non-classroom
• Positive expectations & routines
taught & encouraged
• Active supervision by all staff
– Scan, move, interact
• Precorrections & reminders
• Positive reinforcement
SWPBS
Subsystems
Classroom
Family
Non-classroom
Student
Nonclassroom Settings
• Particular times or places where
supervision is emphasized
– Cafeteria, hallways, playgrounds, bathrooms
– Buses & bus loading zones, parking lots
– Study halls, library, “free time”
– Assemblies, sporting events, dances
• Where instruction is not available as
behavior management tool
Classroom v.
Nonclassroom
• Classroom
• Nonclassroom
– Teacher directed
– Student focused
– Instructionally focused
– Social focus
– Small # of predictable
students
– Large # of
unpredictable students
MANAGEMENT
FEATURES
• Physical/environmental
arrangements
• Routines & expectations
• Staff behavior
• Student behavior
BASIC MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES
• Expected behaviors/routines taught
directly
• Active supervision
– Movement
– Scanning
– Interact
• Precorrections
• Positive reinforcement of expected
behavior
SYSTEMS FEATURES
• School-wide implementation
– All staff
– Direct teaching 1st day/week
– Regular review, practice, & positive
reinforcement
• Team-based identification,
implementation, & evaluation
• Data-based decision making
Basics
“Active Supervision:
Self-Assessment”
YES or NO
Non-Classroom Management: Self-Assessment
Name______________________________
Date_____________
Setting □ Hallway □ Entrance □ Cafeteria
□ Playground □ Other_______________
Time Start_________
Time End _________
Tally each Positive Student Contacts
Total #
Tally each Negative Student Contacts
Total #
Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____: 1
1. Did I have at least 4 positive for 1 negative student contacts?
Yes
No
2. Did I move throughout the area I was supervising?
Yes
No
3. Did I frequently scan the area I was supervising?
Yes
No
4. Did I positively interact with most of the students in the area?
Yes
No
5. Did I handle most minor rule violations quickly and quietly?
Yes
No
6. Did I follow school procedures for handling major rule violations?
Yes
No
7. Do I know our school-wide expectations (positively stated rules)?
Yes
No
8. Did I positively acknowledge at least 5 different students for
displaying our school-wide expectations?
Yes
No
Overall active supervision score:
7-8 “yes” = “Super Supervision”
5-6 “yes” = “So-So Supervision”
<5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed”
# Yes______
Douglas County S.D., CO 4-08
Douglas County S.D., CO 4-08
Douglas County S.D., CO 4-08
HEEIA ELEMENTARY
Cafeteria Example
Elizabeth “Becca” Falelua
Other examples
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Talk-Walk-Squawk
Recess then Lunch
Adopt-a-Bathroom
Neighborhood Watch
1-Way Cones
“Music-Mags-Munchies”
Numbers instead of alphabet
Movement between hallway & classroom
“Trash-Trays-n-Travel” & “Whisper While you Walk”
“Game Rule” cards
Participation in assembly
Why does everyone need
to be involved?
• Staff outnumbered
• Adult presence
– Prompts desired behavior
– Deters problem behavior
• “Being a good citizen”
– Contribute to school climate
Example Supervisors’ Activities
• For each item on Self-Assessment
share one specific strategy you try to
use.
• Observe colleague.
• Video tape & assess.
• Agree on one item that everyone will
emphasize next week, & tell all staff.
• Complete Self-Assessment for one
setting next week, & turn into Tom on
Friday.
SWPBS
Subsystems
Classroom
Family
Non-classroom
Student
Classroom
• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught
& encouraged
• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught &
encouraged
• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adultstudent interaction
• Active supervision
• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior
errors
• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors
• Effective academic instruction & curriculum
Three Basic CM
Elements
1. Instructional/Curricular
Management
2. Environmental Management
3. Proactive Behavior
Management
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
~5%
~15%
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Message
STUDENT
ACHIEVEMENT
Good Teaching
Behavior Management
Increasing District & State Competency and Capacity
Investing in Outcomes, Data, Practices, and Systems
Designing School-Wide Systems
for Student Success
Academic Systems
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•High Intensity
1-5%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
Universal Interventions
•All students
•Preventive, proactive
Behavioral Systems
5-10%
80-90%
1-5%
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•Intense, durable procedures
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
80-90%
Universal Interventions
•All settings, all students
•Preventive, proactive
Responsiveness to
Intervention
Academic
+
Social Behavior
Intensive
Targeted
Universal
Few
Some
All
Dec 7, 2007
RTI
Continuum of
Support for
ALL
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
UNIVERSAL
SCREENING
RtI
CONTINUUM OF
EVIDENCE-BASED
INTERVENTIONS
DATA-BASED
DECISION MAKING
STUDENT
& PROBLEM
PERFORMANCE
SOLVING
CONTINUOUS
PROGRESS
MONITORING
Essential Behavior &
Classroom Management
Practices
See Classroom Management
Self-Checklist (7r)
Classroom Management: Self-Assessment
Teacher__________________________
Rater_______________________
Date___________
Instructional Activity
Time Start_______
Time End________
Tally each Positive Student
Contacts
Total #
Tally each Negative
Student Contacts
Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____ to 1
Total #
Classroom Management Practice
Rating
1.
I have arranged my classroom to minimize crowding and distraction
Yes
No
2.
I have maximized structure and predictability in my classroom (e.g., explicit classroom
routines, specific directions, etc.).
Yes
No
3.
I have posted, taught, reviewed, and reinforced 3-5 positively stated expectations (or rules).
Yes
No
4.
I provided more frequent acknowledgement for appropriate behaviors than inappropriate
behaviors (See top of page).
Yes
No
5.
I provided each student with multiple opportunities to respond and participate during
instruction.
Yes
No
6.
My instruction actively engaged students in observable ways (e.g., writing, verbalizing)
Yes
No
7.
I actively supervised my classroom (e.g., moving, scanning) during instruction.
Yes
No
8.
I ignored or provided quick, direct, explicit reprimands/redirections in response to
inappropriate behavior.
Yes
No
9.
I have multiple strategies/systems in place to acknowledge appropriate behavior (e.g.,
class point systems, praise, etc.).
Yes
No
Yes
No
10. In general, I have provided specific feedback in response to social and academic behavior
errors and correct responses.
Overall classroom management score:
10-8 “yes” = “Super”
7-5 “yes” = “So-So”
# Yes___
<5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed”
-O
ct
3N
o
16 v
-N
o
30 v
-N
ov
7D
ec
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
eb
8F
e
17 b
-F
eb
25
-F
eb
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
13 r
-A
p
29 r
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
100
90
10
0
BL
CI/
CO
CI/CO
+75%
CI/CO
+80%
80
80
90
School Days
CI/CO
+90%
70
Helena
60
50
40
30
20
10
100
0
90
70
Jade
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
Farrell
70
60
50
40
30
20
Began
meds.
Class B
Results
100
BL
CI/
CO
90
CI/CO
+75%
CI/CO
+80%
CI/CO
+90%
80
Helena
70
60
Peer
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
Jade
80
70
60
Peer
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
Farrell
80
70
Peer
60
50
40
30
20
School Days
eb
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
r
13
-A
pr
29
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
-F
25
17
-F
eb
eb
Began
meds.
8F
-O
ct
3N
ov
16
-N
ov
30
-N
ov
7D
ec
0
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
eb
10
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
Class B
Results
+
Compos
ite
Peers
100
BL
90
Study 2
Results
CI/
CO
CI/CO
75%
CI/CO
80%
FB
plan
FB
plan 2
80
Marce llus
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
Blair
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Be n
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Oliv ia
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
e
b
8F
e
b
17
-F
e
b
25
-F
e
b
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
r
13
-A
p
29 r
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
-O
ct
3N
ov
16
-N
o
30 v
-N
ov
7D
ec
0
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
90
School Days
100
CI/
CO
CI/CO
75%
CI/CO
80%
FB
plan
FB
plan 2
80
Marce llus
70
60
Peer
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Peer
Blair
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
Be n
70
60
Peer
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
Peer
Oliv ia
60
50
40
30
20
10
School Days
4M
a
11 r
-M
a
30 r
-M
ar
5A
p
r
13
-A
p
29 r
-A
p
10 r
-M
a
19 y
-M
ay
6Ja
n
13
-J
a
n
18
-J
a
n
27
-J
a
n
3F
eb
8F
eb
17
-F
e
25 b
-F
eb
-O
ct
3N
ov
16
-N
o
30 v
-N
ov
7D
ec
0
26
Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior
Study 2
Results
+
Compo
site
Peer
BL
90