DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 5, 2008 www.cber.org www.pbis.org [email protected].
Download ReportTranscript DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 5, 2008 www.cber.org www.pbis.org [email protected].
DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 5, 2008 www.cber.org www.pbis.org [email protected] Problem Statement “We give schools strategies & systems for developing positive, effective, achieving, & caring school & classroom environments, but implementation is not accurate, consistent, or durable. Schools need more than training.” Implementation Levels Student Classroom School District State Organizer • What does district level systems change look like (Outcome) • What does SWPBS look like (Practices)? • What would district level coordination look like to ensure accurate & sustainable implementation? (Systems) • How would we know if have sustainable implementation? (Data) See PBS Implementation Blueprint Sustaining & Scaling Change • Know your basics • Adopt & adapt evidence-based practices • Monitor implementation fidelity • Give priority to what matters • Keep data regular, easy, & relevant • Know your outcomes • Integrate for efficiency • Build durable capacity • Celebrate successes & improvement SWPBS/PBIS WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT SAFE & EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS? • Positive, predictable school-wide climate • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Formal social skills instruction • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Positive active supervision & reinforcement • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • Positive adult role models • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) • High rates of academic & social success • Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Achieving & Supporting Sustainability Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior Team GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation Team-led Process Behavioral Capacity Priority & Status Representation Team Data-based Decision Making Administrator Communications Top 3 SchoolWide Initiatives Coaching & Facilitation 3-4 Year Commitment Agreements & Supports Dedicated Resources & Time 3-Tiered Prevention Logic Administrative Participation Self-Assessment Efficient Systems of Data Management Team-based Decision Making Data-based Action Plan EvidenceBased Practices Existing Discipline Data Multiple Systems Team Managed Staff Acknowledgements Effective Practices Implementation Continuous Monitoring Administrator Participation Staff Training & Support Team-based Decision Making & Planning Relevant & Measurable Indicators Efficient Input, Storage, & Retrieval Evaluation Continuous Monitoring Effective Visual Displays Regular Review SWPBS Subsystems Classroom Non-classroom Student Family School-wide 1. Common purpose & approach to discipline 2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation Non-classroom • Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged • Active supervision by all staff – Scan, move, interact • Precorrections & reminders • Positive reinforcement Classroom • Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged • Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged • Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adultstudent interaction • Active supervision • Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors • Frequent precorrections for chronic errors • Effective academic instruction & curriculum Individual Student • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations Family • Continuum of positive behavior support for all families • Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements • Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner • Access to system of integrated school & community resources Some Sustainability Basics Need, Agreements, Adoption, & Outcomes Local Demonstration w/ Fidelity 1. IMPLEMENTATION 2. PHASES 4. Systems Adoption, Scaling, & Continuous Regeneration 3. Sustained Capacity, Elaboration, & Replication Scaling Center: Implementation Stages • Exploration • Installation • Initial Implementation • Full Implementation • Innovation • Sustainability Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005 2 – 4 Years Sustainability = Organizational capacity for & documentation of accurate implementation (90%) of evidencebased practice across desired context (e.g., district, classroom, school-wide, nonclassroom) over time w/ local resources & systems for continuous regeneration. Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). J. Evid.-based Prac. in Sch. SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION Continuous Self-Assessment Valued Outcomes Relevance Priority Efficacy Fidelity Practice Implementation Effective Practices Integration Working Smarter Initiative, Project, Committee Attendance Committee Character Education Safety Committee School Spirit Committee Discipline Committee DARE Committee EBS Work Group Purpose Outcome Target Group Staff Involved SIP/SID/e tc ESTABLISHING A CONTINUUM of SWPBS TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound/PCP Audit • Special Education ~5%• 1. Identify existing practices • ~15% • • • • • by tier 2. Specify outcome for each effort SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out 3. Evaluate implementation Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports accuracy & outcome Social skills club effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on PRIMARY4. PREVENTION • Teach & encourage positive outcomes SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline 5. Establish decision rules (RtI) • Effective instruction • Parent engagement • ~80% of Students It’s not just about behavior! STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Good Teaching Behavior Management Increasing District & State Competency and Capacity Investing in Outcomes, Data, Practices, and Systems Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive Behavioral Systems 80-90% 1-5% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING STUDENT & PROBLEM PERFORMANCE SOLVING CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING RtI: Good “IDEiA” Policy Approach or framework for redesigning & establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators • NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention • NOT limited to special education • NOT new Quotable Fixsen • “Policy is – Allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs” – Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action” • “Training does not predict action” – “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications” Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Need, Agreements, Adoption, & Outcomes Local Demonstration w/ Fidelity 1. IMPLEMENTATION 2. PHASES 4. Systems Adoption, Scaling, & Continuous Regeneration 3. Sustained Capacity, Elaboration, & Replication SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION Continuous Self-Assessment Valued Outcomes Relevance Priority Efficacy Fidelity Practice Implementation Effective Practices PBIS Implementation Blueprint PBS Systems Implementation Logic Funding Visibility Political Support Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS • Implementation support • Data-based action plan • Coordination • Capacity building • Policy & funding • Communications • Training capacity • Exemplars • Evaluation MEMBERS • Coordinator • Representation • Behavioral capacity • Agency • Parent/family • Leadership • Etc Training Coaching Evaluation Training Coaching • Continuous • Function oriented • Local support • Data-based • Preventive • Positive • Competent • Etc…. Evaluation • Continuous • Question-based • Academic & social • Efficient • Team-coordinated • Public • Etc…. • Continuous • Embedded • Team-coordinated • Data-based • Local expertise • Action plan linked • Etc…. Funding Visibility • General fund • 3 years of support • Integrated • Data-based • Etc…. • Demos & research • Multiple formats • Multiple audiences • Acknow. others • Etc…. Political Support • Continuous • Top 3 priorities • Quarterly/annually • Policy • Participation • Etc…. Local School Teams/Demonstrations • Fidelity implementation • >80% of staff • >80% of students • Administrator leadership • Team-based • Data driven • Contextually relevant • Teaching focused • Integrated initiatives • Positively oriented • Etc…..