Non-Assurance Services Isabelle Sapet, IESBA Deputy Chair IESBA Meeting September 16-18, 2013 Sydney, Australia Page 1
Download ReportTranscript Non-Assurance Services Isabelle Sapet, IESBA Deputy Chair IESBA Meeting September 16-18, 2013 Sydney, Australia Page 1
Non-Assurance Services Isabelle Sapet, IESBA Deputy Chair IESBA Meeting September 16-18, 2013 Sydney, Australia Page 1 Conclusions from June 2013 IESBA Meeting • Revise the non-assurance services (NAS) project proposal: – Clarify provisions of management responsibility – Clarify the phrase “routine and mechanical” within bookkeeping services – Examine “emergency exceptions” within bookkeeping and taxation services • Develop a paper as a communication vehicle to: – Raise awareness of the Code’s approach to NAS – Emphasize the robustness of the Code’s NAS provisions – Highlight potential supplementary approaches The paper will also address taxation, valuation and internal audit services Page 2 Recent Task Force Developments • Task Force met in August to finalize the project proposal and construct an outline of the NAS paper • Task Force is requesting Board to: – Approve the project proposal (Agenda Item 8-A) – Provide feedback concerning the NAS paper outline (Agenda Item 8-B) Page 3 Project Proposal • Project objective and scope (1/2) – Clarify NAS provisions in the Code concerning management responsibilities (290.162-166) Evaluate the clarity of the term and the overall guidance for consistency in application – Clarify the phrase “routine or mechanical” for bookkeeping services (290.167-174) Consider further guidance for consistency in application Page 4 Project Proposal • Project objective and scope (2/2) – Examine the “emergency exception” provisions related to bookkeeping and taxation services (290.172-174 ; 290 185-186) Consider the appropriateness for continued inclusion in the Code – Propose necessary conforming changes to Section 291 resulting from any of the potential changes to Section 290 Page 5 NAS Paper Outline • NAS Paper Outline – Introduction – Context – NAS issues – Development of Code – How Code addresses issues – Analysis and conclusions (including taxation, valuation & internal audit) – Matters for further consideration Page 6 Timing for NAS Project • September 2013 – Approval of project proposal • April 2014 – Approval of exposure draft • July 2014 – Approval of final NAS paper Page 7 Questions? Page 8 www.ethicsboard.org