Non-Assurance Services Isabelle Sapet, IESBA Deputy Chair IESBA CAG Meeting September 11, 2013 New York Page 1
Download ReportTranscript Non-Assurance Services Isabelle Sapet, IESBA Deputy Chair IESBA CAG Meeting September 11, 2013 New York Page 1
Non-Assurance Services Isabelle Sapet, IESBA Deputy Chair IESBA CAG Meeting September 11, 2013 New York Page 1 Background • Non-assurance services (NAS) work stream added to work plan in 2012 – Consider additional restrictions concerning NAS – Determine if materiality is still appropriate as a basis for prohibiting certain NAS and if guidance is necessary to apply it – Consider if preapproval of NAS by those charged with governance (TCWG) is appropriate • General Board agreement to objective of project but with some concern as to scope given the recent independence projects (Independence I & II) Page 2 Non-Assurance Surveys • Surveys requesting information sent to 26 jurisdictions – Information sought with respect to PIEs and non-PIEs – National provisions concerning NAS that are not addressed in the Code – Survey also covered five key areas: Assuming management responsibility Preparing accounting records and financial statements Valuation services Taxation services Internal audit services Page 3 Survey Responses • Results noted the following: – Jurisdictions are in line with the Code regarding most of Code’s provisions – Approximately half of the jurisdictions surveyed specified more restrictive provisions concerning taxation, valuation and internal audit services mostly due to local laws and regulations – Significant number of jurisdictions do not have emergency provisions for bookkeeping or taxation services – Re materiality, responses varied in terms of services to which materiality may be applied, if at all Page 4 IESBA Conclusions • Code’s approach to, and provisions for, taxation, internal audit and valuation services remain appropriate and will not be part of project scope • Code will benefit from and thus the scope of the project will include: – Clarification concerning “management responsibilities” and bookkeeping services that are “routine and mechanical” for consistency in application – Reconsideration of the emergency provisions for bookkeeping and taxation services Page 5 IESBA Conclusions • IESBA also will develop a paper concerning NAS – Used as communication vehicle to raise awareness of Code’s approach to NAS – Emphasize robustness of Code’s NAS provisions – Highlight supplementary approaches to enhance “threats & safeguards” approach – Increase visibility and transparency of Code’s relevant provisions – Discuss taxation, valuation and internal audit services • IESBA to consider outline of paper next week Page 6 Next Steps • IESBA consideration of revised project proposal next week • Proposed changes to the Code for approval for exposure at April 2014 IESBA meeting • First draft of NAS paper December 2013 IESBA meeting • CAG discussion March 2014 • Final draft of the NAS paper for IESBA approval July 2014 Page 7 Questions? Page 8 www.ethicsboard.org