Who are Russia’s Entrepreneurs? Discussion Simon Johnson Outline 1) Some Big Questions 2) This Project 3) Suggestions 4) Conclusion.

Download Report

Transcript Who are Russia’s Entrepreneurs? Discussion Simon Johnson Outline 1) Some Big Questions 2) This Project 3) Suggestions 4) Conclusion.

Who are Russia’s Entrepreneurs?
Discussion
Simon Johnson
1
Outline
1) Some Big Questions
2) This Project
3) Suggestions
4) Conclusion
2
1. Some Big Questions
• How important are entrepreneurs in economic
development?
– Is it informal microbusinesses?
– Or registering as small entrepreneurs?
– Or the process of growing up to be large private
firms?
• What can entrepreneurs do when property
rights or contracting institutions are weak?
– What should be the institutional reform agenda:
• What is first order?
• What can we really do?
3
2. This Project
• Survey entrepreneurs and nonentrepreneurs (matching?) in 5 large
emerging markets: R, C, B, I & N
– Why not Indonesia, Pakistan?
• Ask about personal characteristics, e.g.,
attitude to risk, family background,
network-type connections
4
The Authors’ Question
• To what extent is entrepreneurship
driven by:
– Institutions
– Social variables
– Individual characteristics
• (Presumably), what policies would
increase the tendency to form new
companies?
5
What do you mean by
Entrepreneurship?
• The MIT model: high tech, spin-offs from
university or large companies
– Ed Roberts: biographies of entrepreneurs; who
sets up and develops companies best?
– Diane Burton: it’s about the initial organizational
structure
– Need to network with venture capital, motivate star
scientists etc (Shane, Stern etc)
• But is this relevant for most of the world?
– Individuals who like risk and have family wealth
are more likely to be independent business people
– Survivor and endogeneity bias
6
– And, at the end of the day, so what?
Intriguing Preliminary Results,
from Russia
• It’s all about mothers: education and
prior experience (sign conflict?)
– Fathers are not that important (or not
around any more? demographic issue)
• Entrepreneurs are short
• Entrepreneurs are oblivious
– They don’t think there is corruption (or
didn’t get hit up yet…?)
7
3. Suggestions
• Make this project central to the institutional
reform debate
– What prevents people from forming and,
particularly, from growing businesses?
– Is there a glass or iron ceiling?
• What obstacles can entrepreneurs find ways
around and what is impassable?
• Is there regional or individual variation in
strategies to cope with weak institutions?
– Bring us all the details
8
We need to unbundle institutions
E.g.,
1. Politics: distribution of political power,
determined by political institutions
–
When political power of elites unconstrained,
•
•
weak property rights for investors because of holdup
potential for blocking of new technologies
2. Law: legal procedures, legal formalism, and
judicial control of economic activity
–
–
–
Greater legal formalism leads to less fair
outcomes and greater gov. intervention
French civil law conducive to legal formalism
Similar results with procedural complexity etc
9
4. Conclusion
• Institutions matter?
– Definitely for long-term growth (100-200 years)
– Maybe for medium-run growth (10-30 years) but
this relationship is much less robust
– Definitely for medium-run volatility/crisis severity
• Evidence on entrepreneurship-indevelopment essentially missing
– Private sector investment is central to
development
– More than just investment by cronies?
– But investment by whom, when and with what
beliefs about returns?
– Are the entrepreneurs the central mechanism?
10