Irrigating Orchards Efficiently for Water and Energy Savings Allan Fulton UC Farm Advisor Tehama County.
Download ReportTranscript Irrigating Orchards Efficiently for Water and Energy Savings Allan Fulton UC Farm Advisor Tehama County.
Irrigating Orchards Efficiently for Water and Energy Savings Allan Fulton UC Farm Advisor Tehama County 1 Reducing Water and Energy Costs • Hours of irrigation and/or pumping • Unit energy cost • Horsepower or kilowatt demand 2 Steps to Reduce Hours of Irrigation or Pumping • Manage orchard floor vegetation 3 Orchard Floor Vegetation Management • Normal and wet years generally encourage orchard floor vegetation o o Helps soil tilth and infiltration rates Important BMP to control runoff • Dry years are the exception o o Consumes winter rainfall, reduces reserve May increase in-season water use up to 25% 4 Steps to Reduce Hours of Irrigation or Pumping • Manage orchard floor vegetation • Operate and maintain irrigation systems that apply water uniformly 5 Evaluations Completed 2002 - 2007 DU Average, Maximum, Minimum Source: Tehama County RCD Mobile Irrigation Lab DU 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Completed Max Min Average Completed Max Min Average Completed Max Min Average Completed Max Min Average Completed Max Min Average Completed Max Min Average Total Max Min 250 191 200 150 98 97 98 97 87 95 96 96 86 82 79 77 67 100 59 53 47 45 42 42 41 33 26 18 50 13 17 13 0 2007 6 Applied water (inches) Distribution Uniformity vs Irrigation Requirement 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Crop needs 2” of water 0.85 0.7 0.6 Distribution Uniformity 0.5 Sources of Non-uniform Irrigation with Drip and Microsprinkler • • • • • • Particulate plugging Chemical plugging Biological plugging Pressure and flow variability System changes Under-designed systems 8 Causes of Non-uniform Flood Irrigation • Soils with high water intake properties • Slow water advance across checks – – – – Field lengths too long or checks too wide In-flow too low Field slope irregular and/or too flat Rough soil surface conditions • Not set up to capture and reuse tailwater runoff 9 Steps to Reduce Hours of Irrigation or Pumping • Manage orchard floor vegetation • Operate and maintain irrigation systems that apply water uniformly • Modify irrigation systems for young trees 10 11 Steps to Reduce Hours of Irrigation or Pumping • Manage orchard floor vegetation • Operate and maintain irrigation systems that apply water uniformly • Modify irrigation system for young trees • Irrigation scheduling and regulated deficit irrigation 12 Irrigation Scheduling •When to irrigate •How much water to apply •Prevent soil moisture from limiting crop • Avoid excess deep percolation and irrigation 13 Irrigation Scheduling Tools • Weather and ETc monitoring • Soil moisture monitoring • Crop stress monitoring 14 Use evapotranspiration (ET) data from weather stations to estimate crop water needs: •Solar Radiation •Wind Speed •Relative Humidity •Air Temperature wwwcimis.water.ca.gov Spatial CIMIS ETo Reporting Many types of Dielectric sensors Regulated Deficit Irrigation – Going a Step Further with Irrigation Scheduling • Purposely allowing crop water stress • Control timing and extent of crop stress • Reducing crop ET • Not affecting yield or minimizing effect • Optimizing profits per unit of water or energy 19 How Does Crop Stress Reduce Crop ET? Microscopic view of leaf surface 20 Tools to Manage Crop Stress 21 Example of Water Savings from Using Crop Stress in Almonds (Glenn County, 2005-2008) Irrigation Treatment 4 –year Avg Yield (pounds nutmeats/acre) 4-year Avg Nut Size (grams per kernel) Water Use Efficiency (gallons water/pound nutmeats) Control1 2,640 1.21 458 Regulated Deficit Irrigation2 2,640 1.18 428 Significance NS 0.02 * NS 1 Consumptive use for control 3.8 acre-feet per acre Consumptive use for Regulated Deficit Irrigation 3.3 acre-feet per acre 3 Water savings of 0.5 acre-feet per acre (13 % reduction in hours of pumping) 2 22 Steps to Reduce Irrigation and Pumping Hours • Manage orchard floor vegetation • Irrigation system maintenance and improvements • Irrigation scheduling and regulated deficit irrigation • Use practices that favor water infiltration not evaporation 23 Practices that Favor Water Infiltration • Longer intervals between irrigations – Alternate check irrigation with flood irrigation systems • Longer set times (within limits) • Minimize irrigation in mid afternoon • Soil and water amendments 24 Ways to Reduce Energy Unit Cost • Compare energy sources and costs – Various rate structures for electricity – Fossil fuels – “Green” energy sources 25 Ways to Reduce Energy Unit Cost • Compare energy sources and costs • When rainfall is low, winter irrigate? 26 Benefits of Winter Irrigation • Build up soil moisture reserve • Pumping lifts may be less • Deeper infiltration, less evaporation • Reserve may help at harvest • Appropriateness of winter irrigation depends on several factors 27 Ways to Reduce Energy Unit Cost • Compare energy sources and costs • When rainfall is low, winter irrigate? • When more than one source of water is available, look for opportunities to coordinate them and save 28 Steps to Reduce Horsepower Requirements • Reduce pressure requirements • Change from impact sprinkler (>50 psi) to drip • Change from high to low pressure micro-irrigation 29 Steps to Reduce Horsepower Requirements • Reduce pressure requirements • Operate efficient pumping plants 30 Electrical Pumping Plant Efficiency % Efficiency gpm x total head = 3960 x Input Horsepower 31 An Efficient Pumping Plant • Provides enough total head to lift and pressurize water • Delivers enough flow capacity (gpm) • Minimizes horsepower requirement • Operates efficiently over expected range of groundwater conditions 32 100 TOTAL HEAD (feet) Example Pumping Plant Performing as Expected 80 60 1984(54%) 1983 (64%) 1985 (62%) 40 20 0 2000 2400 2800 PUMP CAPACITY (gpm) 3200 3600 33 Possible Reasons for Lower Pumping Plant Efficiency Unrelated to Pump Wear & Tear • Declining groundwater level that doesn’t match pump performance characteristics • Change in irrigation system requiring more water or pressure • Declining well efficiency 34 100 TOTAL HEAD (feet) Example Pumping Plant Not Performing as Expected 80 1983 (64%) 1984 (66%) 60 1985 (55%) 40 20 0 2000 2400 2800 PUMP CAPACITY (gpm) 3200 3600 35 Corrective Actions • > 60 % efficiency, no correction • 55 to 60 % efficiency, first impeller adjustment, second repair • 50 to 55 % efficiency, first pump repair, second replacement • < 50 % pump replacement 36 Steps to Reduce Horsepower Requirements • Operate pumps that perform efficiently • Maintain efficient pumping plants • Well efficiency 37 Keys to Reducing Water and Energy Costs • Minimize hours of irrigation or pumping • Acquire energy at a competitive cost • Reduce horsepower or kilowatt demand 38 Don’t Let Irrigation Costs Sneak Up on You! THANK YOU! 39