Wind Energy in the Southeast Dennis Scanlin Appalachian State University www.wind.appstate.edu Presentation to: Southeast Green Power Summit Atlanta, Georgia December 3,2003
Download ReportTranscript Wind Energy in the Southeast Dennis Scanlin Appalachian State University www.wind.appstate.edu Presentation to: Southeast Green Power Summit Atlanta, Georgia December 3,2003
Wind Energy in the Southeast Dennis Scanlin Appalachian State University www.wind.appstate.edu Presentation to: Southeast Green Power Summit Atlanta, Georgia December 3,2003 Sizes & Applications Small (10 kW) Homes Farms Remote Application Intermediate (10-250 kW) Village Power Hybrid Systems Distributed Power Large (660 kW - 2+MW) Central Station Wind Farms Distributed Power Community Wind World Growth Total Installed Wind Capacity 40000 35000 Capacity (MW) 30000 25000 20000 1. Germany: 14000 MW 2. United States: 6374 MW 3. Spain: 5780 MW 4. Denmark: 3094 MW 5. India: 1900 MW 15000 10000 World total 2003: 37220 MW 5000 19 82 19 83 19 84 19 85 19 86 19 87 19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 0 United States Source: WindPower Monthly Europe Rest of World Drivers for Wind Power • Declining Wind Costs • Fuel Price Uncertainty • Federal and State Policies • Economic Development • Green Power • Energy Security Benefits • • • • • 5 million KWH/yr 500 homes $500,000/yr green power 7.5 million lbs CO2/yr 8.3 tons NOX/yr Reliability of Wind Turbines 100 % Available 80 60 40 20 0 1981 '83 '85 '90 '98 Year Capacity & Cost Trends 100 90 80 70 6000 5000 4000 60 50 40 30 3000 2000 20 10 1000 0 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 0 2004 *Year 2000 dollars Increased Turbine Size - R&D Advances - Manufacturing Improvements Capacity (MW) Cost of Energy (cents/kWh*) Cost of Energy and Cumulative Domestic Capacity Low Cost Electricity Wind Energy Cost Competitiveness ¢/kWh 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 12.8 Value of PTC 8.2 4.2 Source: BTM Consult 4.2 5.0 5.2 8.7 Average Wind Velocity & Cost/KWH • Locations with higher average wind speeds will produce electricity for less Location and Percentage of High Quality Wind Resources in the US Class 6 (4.3%) Class 5 (6.3%) Class 4 & above 27.5% North Carolina Wind Map Ashe & Watauga County Wind Classes Land Areas of Wind Power Classes in 24 Western NC Counties Class @ 50m Power Density (W/m2) Area (acres) Percentage of Total 1- < 100 3,889,086 59.32 1+ (100, 200] 1,895,923 28.92 2 (200, 300] 473,175 7.22 3 (300, 400] 159,767 2.44 4 (400, 500] 68,013 1.04 5 (500, 600] 30,374 0.46 6 (600, 800] 24,275 0.37 7 > 800 15,419 0.24 >= 2 (200, > 800] 771,024 11.76 >= 4 (400, > 800] 138,000 2.1 Wind Resource Analysis by County (acres) Top 5 Counties in Western NC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2-7 4-7 Haywood 99484 36769 19294 9360 4576 5120 3242 78361 22298 Watauga 93356 47809 14302 5396 2303 1729 939 72480 10368 Buncombe 191061 33596 13976 6592 3182 2688 2668 62705 15132 Ashe 184824 40000 9162 4190 1877 1877 1166 58277 9113 Avery 79528 9281 4210 2352 1739 1107 46495 9409 27804 County Wind Maps for Western NC True Wind Map Combined With: Road data Digital elevation models Public lands Appalachian Trail Town boundaries Utility grid Tax parcel maps www.wind.appstate.edu North Carolina Coastal Resources Number of Turbines in Class 4/5 Sites @ 80m to produce: 10% Blue Ridge Electric 10 % Mt. Electric 10% NC 18 10 2400 Small Residential Scale Turbines could power 1 -3 houses (3,000 – 30,000 WWH/yr) Issues for Wind Energy Issues for Wind • Legal – “ridge law” – park/forest restrictions • Visual Impacts • Attitudes towards Wind • Avian Impacts • Indirect negative economic impacts – real estate values Mountain Ridge Protection Act of 1983 • “No building, structure or unit shall protrude at its uppermost point above the crest of the ridge by more than 35’ Exemptions to Ridge Law • Water, radio, telephone or television towers or any equipment for the transmission of electricity or communications or both • Structures of a relatively slender nature and minor vertical projections of a parent building, including chimneys, flagpoles, flues, spires, steeples, belfries, cupolas, antennas, poles, wires, or windmills NC Attorney General’s 2/4/2002 letter to TVA • “The Legislature in 1983 had in mind, the traditional, solitary farm windmill which has long been in use in rural communities, not windfarm turbines of the size, type, or certainly number proposed here…” Boone, NC 2MW Mod-1 Turbine: 1979 - 1983 Public Lands and Wind Resources in North Carolina 35% of land area with class 2 or higher 46% of land area with class 4 or higher Public Lands in North Carolina Land Ownership Cherokee Corps Engineers National Park National Forest State PArk TVA Other Visual Impacts 10 Turbines from 6 miles away Attitudes • 2002 Western NC Survey found: – 75% indicating they wanted more wind power – 63.5% support for turbines on ridge tops, 19% against – 79% for single turbines, 9% against – 57.3% supported clusters of 10 or more turbines on ridge tops, 27.5% against – 66% supported turbines near their home, 21% against Avian Issues • Perspective • Pre and post construction assessment routine – – – – – How many birds use proposed site? What kinds of birds use the proposed site? How is usage related to time of year/day? Are there species of special concern present? Does development have potential to impact species of high priority? – Can research identify impacts and develop mitigation strategies prior to construction? Wind Activities 1) Wind Resource Assessment a. NC State Wind Map b. Anemometer loan program c. TVA wind assessment work d. NC Wind Energy Assessment Projects 2) Education a. Small Wind Workshops at ASU and Solar Center b. Wind Summit in Boone, NC c. Anemometer loan program 3) Wind Working Group 4) Economic impact analyses 5) Environmental and Avian Impact analyses 6) Legal/Permitting Issues 7) Attitudinal surveys 8) Web Site: http://www.ncwindpower.appstate.edu/ In conclusion: Good wind resources in mountains and along coastal areas in all southeastern states, although not widespread, Technology is available, reliable and economical, Majority seem to support wind energy, although significant opposition exists, significant barriers/ concerns, more possibilities for small wind