The JPARC Neutrino Target Y.Hayato (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for T.Nakadaira & J-PARC n beam-line construction group (I borrowed most of all the transparencies.

Download Report

Transcript The JPARC Neutrino Target Y.Hayato (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for T.Nakadaira & J-PARC n beam-line construction group (I borrowed most of all the transparencies.

The JPARC Neutrino Target
Y.Hayato (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo)
for T.Nakadaira
& J-PARC n beam-line construction group
(I borrowed most of all the transparencies from Nakadaira-san)
J-PARC neutrino beam line
Primary Proton
beam line
Proton Energy
50GeV
(40/30GeV @ T=0)
# of Protons / pulse 3.31014
Beam Power
750kW
 4MW @ Phase II
Bunch structure
8 (15) bunches/spill
Spill width ~5ms
Extraction
point
Target
Target station
Decay volume
beam dump
muon monitor
Cycle: 3~4 sec
Bunch spacing: ~600(300) ns
Bunch length: 58ns (Full width)
Near neutrino
detector
Target Station
• Accommodate
– Baffle: Graphite, 32mmf hole x
1.7m long to protect 1st horn
– Target
– 3 Horns
• Area filled with Helium gas
– reduce Tritium, NOx
production
• Highly radio-activated
– ~1Sv/h,
– Need remote-controlled
maintenance system
• Need cooling (Helium vessel,
radiation shield,..)
3rd horn
2nd horn
472
beam
1400
900
Target
Baffle
Trg&
1st horn
809
1400
Baffle
2000
1st Horn 2nd Horn
100 cm
2500
3rd Horn
Target dimension
• Co-axial 2 layer cooling pipe: Graphite / Ti-6Al-4V, Helium cooling
47.0
Outer pipe
46.4
Ti-6Al-4V
Inner pipe
39.6
35.6
26.0
[mm]
IG-43
target
IG-43
Cooing path
Sectional area
= 4.610-4 [m2]
f=47mm
spacer
f=26mm
One design of the target & surrounding cooling pipe
(Not the final design).
陽子ビーム
He inlet
He outlet
Ti-6Al-4V
Beam window
Ti-6Al-4V
陽子ビーム
Target
Need further design study
Graphite IG-43
} To downstream
} To downstream
Design of inlet and outlet
of He Gas is not fixed.
Target cooling : Water or Helium?
Disadvantage
Advantage
Water Cooling
Very Efficient
 High Heat transfer ratio
 Already tested.
 Simple circulation system
large Irradiation effect
 Ttarget  300C
to avoid the water boiling:
Ttarget @ surface < 100C
Target container is needed.
DPwater= ~2MPa due to the
temperature rise by a beam hit.
Huge radioactive waste water
Helium Gas cooling
We can control Ttarget to
minimize the irradiation
effect. (Ttarget = 400 ~ 800 C)
 Reduce radioactive waste water
 No target container is needed
 Very High flow rate
~ 2000 l/min [0.5MPa]
~ 12000 l/min [0.1MPa]
 Circulation system is
complicated.
 Special treatment for the
high temperature gas
(200C) is necessary.
Target : Conceptual design
• Core: Isotropic-Graphite : IG-43 (Toyo Tanso Co. Ltd)
– Energy deposit… Total: ~40kJ/spill (30GeV)
 DT  200K. seq = 7.5 [MPa]  Tensile strength = 37.2 [MPa]
MARS
Distribution of the energy deposit in the target (w/ 1 spill)
J/gK degree
proton beam
f=47mm
cm
f=26mm
R target
DR (target ~ horn)
13 [mm]
3[mm]
Energy deposit (30GeV, sx= sy =4.24mm)
Target
Inner Pipe
Outer Pipe
Insulator
Targeting Efficiency
For Gaussian beam
39.3 [kJ/spill]
3.5 [kJ/spill]
1.1 [kJ/spill]
1.5 [kJ/spill]
99.09%
(0.91%loss)
Helium flow (T gas < 200C, suction=0.03MPa)
Cross section
Flow rate
Avg. speed @ target
DP @straight part+1 hex
st
459.3 [mm2]
491 [Nm3/h]
246 [m/s]
0.0833 [MPa]
Irradiation Effect of Graphite
• Expected radiation damage of the target
– The approximation formula used by NuMI target group : 0.25dpa/year
– MARS simulation
: 0.15~0.20 dpa/year
• Dimension change : shrinkage by ~5mm in length in 5 years at maximum.
~75mm in radius
• Degradation of thermal conductivity … decreased by 97%
@ 200 C
70~80% @ 400 C
• Magnitude of the damage strongly depends
on the irradiation temperature.
– It is better to keep the temperature of target around 400 ~ 800 C
400
600
800 1000
Irradiation
JAERI report (1991)
Temperature(C)
-0.5%
2dpa
1dpa
800oC
400oC
Dimension change
Toyo-Tanso Co Ltd. IG-11
Thermal conductivity (After/Before)
1
2
3
(dpa)
FEM simulation of He cooling
• Assumptions: 0.19MPa
He Initial temperature: 25 C
He flow rate:
6000 [l/min]  194 [m/sec]
Heat convection rate: 820 [W/m2/K]
(50GeV,f=15mm)
Target Temperature
Max: ~ 500 C
Avg. : ~380 C
Min: ~ 300 C
Helium Temperature
Max: ~160 C
Avg. : ~40 C
(DT = 135 C)
FEM simulation of He cooling
25C
~34C
~102C
38C
160C
395C
500C
~380C
~300C
(50GeV,f=15mm)
• Assumptions: 0.19MPa
(Possible pressure drop at
the downstream of target is
taken into account.)
• He Initial temperature: 25 C
He flow rate:
6000 [l/min]  194 [m/sec]
Heat convection rate:
820 [W/m2/K]
fin.