FKE-FTK-BPA-PK FKE - FTK Zamani Md Sani Nur Ilyana Apandi RusdyYaacob Nurul Ain Said Loi Wei Sen Arfah Ahmad Nur Maisarah Aimie Nazmin Aminurrashid (FTK) Khalil Azha (FTK) BPA Pusat Komputer Noor Asyikin Al-Qais Alias Azhar.

Download Report

Transcript FKE-FTK-BPA-PK FKE - FTK Zamani Md Sani Nur Ilyana Apandi RusdyYaacob Nurul Ain Said Loi Wei Sen Arfah Ahmad Nur Maisarah Aimie Nazmin Aminurrashid (FTK) Khalil Azha (FTK) BPA Pusat Komputer Noor Asyikin Al-Qais Alias Azhar.

FKE-FTK-BPA-PK
FKE - FTK
Zamani Md Sani
Nur Ilyana Apandi
RusdyYaacob
Nurul Ain Said
Loi Wei Sen
Arfah Ahmad
Nur Maisarah
Aimie Nazmin
Aminurrashid (FTK)
Khalil Azha (FTK)
BPA
Pusat Komputer
Noor Asyikin
Al-Qais Alias
Azhar Ismail
Rozana Abu Bakar
Norazhar Ahmad
Norhayati Ahmad
Mohd Reduan
Problems related to the system..
 Students are given options to sit anywhere as long in the
range
 Hard to trace absentees when there longer traceable
method available.
 ~1 hour to check/reorganize students attendees by lecturers
 Longer time to double check and finding misplace/lost
answer paper
 Conclusion – there
improvement
are more room for
Students discipline issue
 Higher risk for student sit in grouping. With the system
potential of students sits together are higher.
 With groups, student maybe can discuss together.
Post exam issues
 Trivial issues for handling the answer paper by the
examiner
 Potential quality issues based on wrong key in marks in
the system by the examiner
 Inefficient time spent for key in the marks

Based on the capacity of the exam hall
 Sport Complex – 450 seats
 Main hall – 800 seats

Same with the old ranging method, BUT now
each of the students has its own table number
provided in the slip
1
8
9
16
17
24
25
32
2
7
10
15
18
23
26
31
3
6
11
14
19
22
27
30
4
5
12
13
20
21
28
29
&
vs

Attendance checking must be based on the slip + table
number together with the file containing the list of
students names. (estimate ~20 minutes for 60 students).
Preferable done by the subject lecturer.

Empty table means – on the spot traceable
absentees.

Answer paper collection as per normal process. If there is
no tally, then the serial number should be referred to
solve the problems.
Preferable to arrange the paper by numbers too!!
I’ll give you the reason why – in the video



Easier for control



Students are forced to sit on the given number. We have more power.
Minimizing students grouping – minimizing copying effort in exam
Tracking purpose
 Absentees & late comers can be traced on the spot
 Attendance slip check reduce to only maximum ~20 minutes
 Final answer paper tally issue at the end of exam can be reduced

Post exam with easier tracking (For lecturers)
 Easy to key in marks to personal record and then to SMP
 Faster way to trace the sample for test answer for AEC


FKE is the pioneer in using the methods in mid
term i.e. test 1 and test 2
To design, took~10 minutes for 70 students but
the Return Of Investment is more than that…
Interested? let us know ….
i)
ii)
iii)
Seat number on attendance sheet for
invigilators
Arrangements up to 2 lines skip
New numbering arrangement in halls

Video



Completed for Sem Khas in August with minor
issues
Completed 1st and 2nd year Diploma examination
with minor issues
Current – 3rd year diploma still with minor issues.

Upgrade your life version … @ UTeM