Consultation and Negotiation - The Fire Officers Association
Download
Report
Transcript Consultation and Negotiation - The Fire Officers Association
Introduction to Consultation
and Negotiation Skills
OBJECTIVES:
To outline the difference between consultation, negotiation and joint
problem solving
To Examine the benefits of consultation
To understand negotiation theory and basic negotiation skills
To appreciate the difference between position based and interest
based bargaining
To understand the different stages of negotiation
To appreciate how Individual behaviours impact on the negotiating
process.
Knowing the Boundaries
What types of issue might you be consulted on in your
organisation?
What types of issue might you negotiate on in your organisation?
What problems are caused in differentiating between consultation
and negotiation?
Session 1
CONSULTATION
The Definition: Consultation
The process by which management and employees/ representatives
jointly examine and discuss issues of mutual concern.
Involves seeking acceptable solutions to problems through
genuine exchange of views and information whilst
management reserve the right to make decisions.
Benefits of Consultation
Promotes employee involvement
Fosters employee and management co-operation
Uses combined knowledge of those affected
Leads to better quality decision making
Potential problems are addressed at early stages
Clarifies each others' position
Smooth and effective Implementation of change
Improves morale and organisational effectiveness.
Joint Problem Solving
Enables management and employees/ representatives to identify,
tackle and resolve issues together. Understanding of and
commitment to outcomes achieved through consensus decision
making.
Solves problems on the basis that elements of the outcomes
may need to be negotiated
Consensus
A group reaches consensus when all members agree upon a
solution and can honestly say:
I believe you understand my point of view and I
understand yours.
Whether or not I prefer this decision I support it because:
- It was reached fairly
- It is the best decision for us at the time.
Or…
A group doesn’t reach a consensus when all members can’t
agree upon a solution and can honestly say:
Session 2:
Negotiation
Negotiation
The process of bargaining to reach a deal.
Implies acceptance by both parties that agreement between them is
required (or is desirable) before a decision can be implemented.
Both parties must have some level of commitment to do a deal.
Both parties must have the authority and will to vary the terms.
To Negotiate all parties
must have:
A broad appreciation of the principle bargaining theories
An understanding of the different stages of negotiation
An awareness of how individual behaviours impact on the
negotiating process.
Negotiating Theories
Integrative Bargaining
Distributive Bargaining
WIN / WIN
WIN/ LOSE
Principled
Traditional
Interest Based
Position Based
Disclose Information Keep Information
The Stages of Negotiation
1. Preparation
2. Opening moves
3. Middle game
4. End game
Preparation
1.
Decide your Objectives
2.
Decide the Strategy
3.
Research the Subject
4.
Clarify your needs
5.
Anticipate 'their' needs
6.
Assign team roles
7.
Carefully consider any requests for informal
discussions
Prepare Your Strategy
Employees Objectives
Ideal
Realistic
Fallback
Area for
movement
Fallback
Realistic
Employer’s objectives
Ideal
Prioritise your ‘Tradeables’
1. List all the objectives you want to achieve or would like to achieve
2. Priority rank the list from both parties points of view will help to
identify areas where negotiations will be most difficult, and
concessions most hard to win
and
3. Priority rank the issues where there is scope for mutually
beneficial trades.
Opening Moves
Establish credibility of your own position
Develop common ground and shared values
Question, probe and listen
Summarise and clarify
Stress benefits of reaching an agreement
The Middle Game
Make proposals ........ what if?
Can you package the proposals differently?
Signal a willingness to consider/agree to proposals
Consider the other side's subliminal signals
Assess what is on offer
Link and inter-relate issues "If .....then"
Have different options/ideas available.
End Game
Look for opportunities to close the deal
Be aware of the need to save face
Put agreements in writing
-
when effective from?
effective for what period of time ?
who should be informed/ by when and by what means?
Review the team’s performance.
Positive and Negative Behaviours
in Negotiation
Negotiators should:
Avoid
Practice
Interrupting
Questioning
Scoring points
Listening
Talking too much
Summarising
Sarcasm
Challenging
Threats
Looking for clues
Personalising
Focusing on the problem
Entrenched positions
Identifying interests
Types of Negotiator
The ‘Rambo’
The goal is victory and
will pursue it ruthlessly not interested in 'people'
effect
–
The Soft Touch
People oriented - will make
offers, or yield to pressure
The Top-Blower
Frequently loses temper and
threatens or does walk out
The Long Pauser
A tactic designed to
get other side to
reveal more
The Interrogator
Uses constant
interrogation
techniques designed to
make other side feel
has not prepared
properly
The Lecturer
Loves the sound of
own voice pontificates, fails to
listen to what other
side is saying
Negotiating Tactics
Make Token Concessions
Speak to the Silent (because they didn’t know your stance, or are
surprised by your knowledge or stance)
Suggest incomplete brief (stall discussions until more information
is made available)
Wildman / Statesman (Choose your behaviour pattern)
Negotiation Procedure
1.
The Process
2.
The Timescale
3.
The Stages
4.
Conciliation And Arbitration?
Informal Discussions
Informal discussions can be dangerous if
confidentialities are not honoured.
Informal discussions can lead to accusations of
underhand dealing.
Informal discussions can lead to the exposing of the
fall-back position, and can lead to the fall-back
position being taken as read.
Planning and preparation
Consider venue, facilities, refreshments, break-out rooms,
etc (In other words ‘Case the Joint’ if you don’t know it).
Expect the employer to explain the background to
proposal before stating their position. This builds the case
rather than stating a position that has to then be justified.
Explain your stance to the proposals and the reasoning
behind your stance.
Question: Two parties both
want an orange:
Formula for the Solution:
Step 1:
Dig beneath their positions to find out why they want it.
Step2:
Identify interests to achieve a win-win situation.
Interests:
One party wants the juice and the other party wants the rind for a
cake.
Problem solved – the orange can be shared.
PERSONALITIES AND ATTITUDES CAN CREATE OR
DESTROY A GOOD WORKING ENVIRONMENT