Transcript Knowledge Exchange Visualisation

Connecting learners to sharers…. …and people with similar things to share or learn…
Kaia
A
Sarah E
Natalia
O
Fred C
Jan v O
Enrique
M
Heidi S
One
IOne
IIwant
want
Iwant
IIwant
want
Ithing
want
thing
would
toto
toto
share
learn
to
Ilearn
to
learn
Iwant
learn:
want
like
learn
learn
“how
“[my
“more
“how
to
“more
to
to
“have
“Clear
“how
“(1)
learn
learn:
learn:
to
view
anyone
about
the
about
facilitate
people
others
“(1)
and
“How
of]
“is
usual
Which
experiences
OM
how
the
practice
has
experienced
does
have
a(!)application
as
to
used
session
are
how
potentially
outcome
OM
made
based
the
OM
to
relate
with
with
inof
constraints
Icomplex
programme
stakeholders
to
integrate
useful
the
want
OM
the
mapping
constraints
monitoring
participation
ato
beneficiaries
atforum
learn:
systems
(at
RBM
when
evaluations
can
least)
that
of
“(1)
and
work;
applying
be
development
of
for
one
two
How
possibilities
used
more
O/M
- change
how
I should
so
levels:
carried
different
approaches
in
learning-based
powerful-boundary
often
are
post-disaster
(such
consider
they
1.
stakeholders
hear
out
of
Behavioural
groups
putting
involved
as
within
that
inchange
in
large
have
PCM
/OM
an
complex
and
spread
rehabilitation
Ioutcome
approaches?
LogFrame
want
partners?
and
how
projects/program
experimented
changes
to
how
out
projects
tolearn
mapping
identify
through
indo
&How
a
situations,
OM
among
“(1)
we
large
Are
that
does
involve
together
them
framework.
with
what
athere
organization)”
large
need
teams
policy
one
and
particularly
better?
toways
the
region.
to
do
(for
go
improved
makers
aren’t
focus
right
and
This
about
to
planning
How
get
The
what
able
people?
on
is
looking
and
to
telling
around
our
the
tangible
forum
identify
to
not
and
first
to
atI
Organizational
M&E).
stakeholders
impacts
refer
year
policymakers,
keep
some
do
boundary
how
to
of
when
Iup
have
is
implementing
itof
astheir
might
called
these
well
trying
partners
in
some
Practices
monitoring
for
the
as
be
the
issues?
toexample,
assessments
used
process
own
combine
Eastern
in
outcome
aexperiences
in
component
Are
better
so
linking
of
that
Indonesia
I’d
RBM
some
"mainstreaming"
mapping
like
way,
of
one
relief
behavioural
and
learningto
of
and
wants
how
try
OM
Forum.
logic
and
inaand
to
the
and
few
to
St2eep
theoretical
figure
(2)
One
This
change
differentiate
models
oriented
energy
changes,
I What
want
thing
consists
out
programme
their
with
to
complementary
in
what
approaches
Ithinking,
share
development
would
particularly
development
them
OM.
behaviours?
ofmakes
broad
“issues
(I
like
from
and
but
think
itmore
to
range
Iwithin
strategic
while
work
am
share:
tools,
planning,
around
Iefforts.”
What
already
appropriate
most
of
and
the
individual
methodologies
“stakeholders.
ifpartners
would
linking
monitoring
what
interested
they
did
including
one
do
makes
like
and
than
the
and
not
of
toin
is
The
and
share
appreciating
Iother
itwant
ongoing,
institutional
'how-to'
see
fall
the
organizational
exercises
aim
IICD's
apart
stakeholders
to
anything
"not
oflearn
link
the
we
to
and
M&E
energy
capacity
do").
people
will
forum
both
what
wrong
detangle
have
practices
methodology
others?”
Iapproaches
that
are
as
also
ishave
development
with
to
an
to
a
the
want
become
the
program
start
essential
used
their
(OP)
“10
methodological,
to
planning
and
most
for
behaviour?
be
with
amay
each
efforts.
input
knowledge
see
able
'how-to'
common
other
aim
for
where
of
to
to athe
all
Ito
process,
stages
convince
Isupport
the
Would
also
aspects
itwant
has
community
intarct
MDGs,
meaningful
second
in
to
arguments
similarities
we
and
changes
OM
share
of
colleagues
to
require
organizational
and
workload
(i.e.
influence
Heidi's
which,
“my
end
explicit
in
Enriques
with
against
aexperiences
existing
of
suggestion
'previous'
(who
through
elements
year
BP
OM.
inclusion
using
environment?
may
assessment
example
evaluation.”
To
M&E
the
workshop
learn
be
so
OM”
on
of
in
sharing
systems.”
hostile
Ihow
specific
Poverty
of
can
more,
Force
and
OM
give
to
or
Istrategic
Reduction
And
want
ofcan
skeptical)
advice
knowledge,
(2)
to
support
How
share
planning:
to
Strategies.
project/program
toknowledge
monitoring
“…a
Field
address
view
networks
define
please
OPs
number
Analysis)”
an
(2)
M&E
OM
visit:
this?”
deal
and
Behavioural
tools.
management
of
priorities
approach
teams
with
resources,
comments
thebased
and
creative
change
asand
are
afrom
how
and
able
to
solution
Iin
various
on
want
manage
learning
energy
I this
to
want
organisational
influence
http://www.iicd.org/evaluation”
tocommunity's
to
authors
share
to
end-users
focus
the
processes
share
infor
“(1)
development
important
about
“experiences
learning
that
tips
-real-life
of
for
possible
on
isaexample
collected
project,
results
the
strategies.”
experiences.”
inrole
constraints
the
with
(2)
program
potential
of
not
region
OM
how
donor
to be
to
toor
workshops.
I(2)
Ioverwhelmed
organisations
become
Iwant
want
organization,
would
The
use
when
to
to
users
experiences
OM
like
share
more
share
applying
The
tools
toofwith
who
effective
“tips
share
but
“(1)
approaches
improved
effectively
loads
not
support
My
learning-based
for
others
“How
the
overcoming
experiences
within
ofcookstoves.”
overall
to
change
have
info
for
and
use
each
monitoring.
and
possibilities
on
capacities,
Force
processes
resistance”
member's
using
in
effectively
PCM
actually
Field
O/M
to
sphere
motivations
introduce
Analysis
implementing
which
approaches,
I want
within
ofare
influence.
to
to
OM
and
different
develop
guided
share
to
OM
in
contexts
athe
use
diverse
“How
with
The
by
acultural
context
Strategy
outcome
it?forum
ato
innatural
public
use
which
contexts.
of
hopes
Map.
OM
mapping.
capacity
within
resource
the
with
Force
to
group
be
24-a
mangaement
Field
conduit
Iworks.
I(2)
want
want
hours
participants
development
practical
analysis
to
to
how
for
and
share
learn
more
can
project
experiences
'how-to'
can
that
“from
“how
these
effective
in
help
are
the
[by
Iadvice
work
am
identify
be
hostile
education
implementation
linked,
on
development
using
with
or
the
to
broad
experience
OM
OM
challenge
itand
sector
orwithout
in
strategies
how
aren’t
abased
Iin
large
mean
can
on
of
they
public
interested
“As
using
Ikeeping
doing
on
want
and
be
Ithe
am
sector
OM
specific
linked
to
the
Paris
currently
the
share:
in
monitoring,
institution
such
learning
to
monitoring
Declaration
activities
mentioning
organizational
“Experiences
Africa…”
contexts,
working
about
to
using
for
process
foster
(March
it.”
on
each
it.
especially
the
the
on
improvement?”
For
organizational
OM
Outcome
going
what
2005)
above
example,
tools
in
to
and
for
two
the
do
/
issues,
making
journals
increasing
area
Challenge
and
how
ofwhat
Ito
sure
multi-sector
will
and
run
aid
their
not
hopefully
itothers]
and
an
promotes
effectiveness…
toProgress
OM
cultural
do(2)
policy
workshop
when
soon
Some
learning
change”
Markers,
coordination
be
trying
tips
able
itwithout
does
and
to
and
tocombine
and
is
share
seem
pointers
ever
carried
where
even
my
to
we
me
add
referring
are
that
temporality.
for
interested
OM
experiences
out
organizing
to is
the
byrelevant
RBM
groups
methodology
Ininthat
promoting
an
and
in herem
these
of
way
OM
OM.”
people…”
workshop”
the
areas!”
or
and
and
strategy
thein
facilitating
jargon.”
many
map
of
the
look
dialogue
projects
more dynamic
oriented
betweentowards
and
policy
easier
makers
social
to related
change
acoss toin
Indonesia,
ministerial especially
and organisational
outcomes”
for (CDD)boundaries.”
projects…”
Beatrice
B
Ben R
Who’s next?
?
Lorra T
Petra K
Daniel R
Huib
Nele B
Gordon
M