Transcript Water strategie

MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR
WATER SUPPLY AND SEWARAGE
SECTOR IN THE REPUBLIC OF
BULGARIA
Water resources
General provisions
Ground water resources – 70% out of the total water resource
Underground water resources – 30% out of the water resource
Quality of the water resources
Utilization of the water resources
The annual average water consumption on the country is estimated at
approximately 10-12 billion m3 per year. For the various branches of economy it is
divided as follows:
 drinking water supply
- 8-10 %
 irrigation
- 5-35 %
 industrial water supply
- 20-26 %
 hydropower
- 15-35 %
For water supply of the settlements 11 dams are used:
№
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Dam
Hristo
Smirnenski
Jovkovtsi
Borovitsa
Asenovets
Kamchia
Srechenska bara
Jasna poljana
Novo
Panicherovo
Studena
Iskar
Beli Iskar
Main settlement supplied
with water
Gabrovo
Total
volume of
resservoir
/mln.m3/
18,7
Veliko Tarnovo
Kardjali
Sliven
Burgas and Varna
Montana and Vratsa
Southern Black Sea
Southern Black Sea
92,2
27,3
28,2
228,5
16,5
34,7
1,8
Pernik
Sofia
Sofia
25,2
670
15,3
Dams used for water supply
Бабово
Силистра
Русе
Свищов
Разград
Монтана
Плевен
Търговище
яз. Среченска бара
Враца
Ловеч
яз. Ястребино
яз. Черни Осъм
Тетевен
София
Перник
яз. Студена
яз. Раянци
яз. Тополница
Кюстендил
Твърдица
яз. Камчия
Бата
Несебър
Ахелой
Бургас
Ямбол
Ясна поляна
яз. Ново паничарево
Чирпан
Пловдив
Пазарджик
яз. Ясна поляна
Димитровград
Велинград
яз. Ракочевица
яз. Асеновец
Камчия
яз. Индже войвода
яз. Бели Искър
Благоевград
Братан
Котел
Сливен
Самоков
Дупница
яз. Дяково
Елена
Трявна
Сопот
Пирдоп
Карлово
яз. Луда Яна
яз. Черешка
Калофер
Стрелча
Панагюрище
яз. Тича
яз. Братан
яз. Йовковци
яз. Хр.Смирненски
яз. Бяла
яз. Искър
яз. Кюстендил
Габрово
Стоките
яз. Бебреш
яз. Красава
яз. Нейковци
Варна
Преслав
В.Търново
Ботевград
Шумен
Хасково
Батак
яз. Младеж
Малко търново
Харманли
яз. Тракиец
яз. Боровица
яз. Сатовча
Кърджали
Гоце Делчев
Сандански
яз. Петрич
Смолян
Мадан
яз. Пловдивци
яз. Джебел
Dams in operation
Dams in the process of construction
Dams under design
Карта на ПСПВ в експлоатация
Map of the Drinking Water Purification Plants inБабово
operation
Русе
Свищов
Силистра
Разград
Монтана
Плевен
Враца
Търговище
Мездра
Ботевград
Етрополе
Искрец
Drinking water
Златна Панега
Тетевен
Габрово
Стоките
Правец
Брезник
Перник
Бистрица
Кюстендил
Твърдица
Шивачево
Радуил
Семково
Братан
Котел
Бата
Несебър
Сливен
Ахелой
Бургас
Ямбол
Пловдив
Чирпан
Приморско
Калово
Пазарджик
Храбрино
Куртово Конаре
Перущица
Батак
Димитровград
Хасково
Кърджали
Гоце Делчев
Камчия
Зидарово
Ясна поляна
Велинград
Смолян
Сандански
Петрич
Елена
Самоков
Рила
Благоевград
Трявна
Панагюрище
Лобош Рударци
Бобов дол
Дупница
В.Търново
Златица Антон
Сопот
Пирдоп
Челопеч
Карлово
Калофер
Стрелча
София
Варна
Преслав
Ловеч
Люти брод
Шумен
Мадан
Харманли
Малко търново
Sewerage Networks and Waste Water Treatment in the
Settlements
Constructed sewerage network and external collectors - 9 013 кm
The share of the towns provided with the sewerage network is 70,2%, and the share of the
villages - 2,1%.
The percentage of the population provided with access to the sewerage network - 46%.
53 Waste Water Treatment Plants have been constructed and placed in service by the end of
2001. 39 of them work with biological treatment while the rest 13 only with mechanical
treatment of the water. Those Treatment Plants serve 63 settlements where 35,7% of the
population live.
INSTITUTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE SECTOR
MRDPW
MOEW
Basin
Directorate
s
MUNICIPALITIES
COMMERCIAL WATER SUPPLY
AND SEWERAGE COMPANIES
COMMERCIAL WATER SUPPLY
AND SEWERAGE COMPANIES
State Regulatory
Commission
COMMERCIAL WATER SUPPLY
AND SEWERAGE COMPANIES
COMMERCIAL WATER SUPPLY
AND SEWERAGE COMPANIES
Regional
Inspection
Bodies on
Environment and
Waters
COMMERCIAL WATER SUPPLY
AND SEWERAGE COMPANIES
REGULATORY
BODIES
Water Supply and Sewerage
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
COMMERCIAL WATER
SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE
COMPANIES
OPERATORS
STATE ENTERPRICE IN CHARGE
WITH THE WATER SUPPLY AND
SEWERAGE ACTIVITIES
Hygiene
epidemic
Inspection
body
Institutional Organization and Existing Forms of
Management in Water Supply and Sewerage
100%
state ownership
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Blagoevgard
Burgas
Vidin
Dobrich
Pazardjik
Pleven
Plovdiv
Razgrad
Smolyan
Sofia-region
Stara Zagora
Haskovo
Jambol
Shared ownership
51% state ownwership
49% municipal
Varna
Vratza
Gabrovo
Dimitrovgrad
Isperih
Kardjali
Kjustendil
Lovech
Montana
Pernik
Russe
Silistra
Sliven
Targovishte
Shumen
Veliko Tarnovo
100%
municipal
Batak
Belovo
Berkovitsa
Botevgrad
Bratsigovo
Breznik
Velingrad
Dupnitsa
Kresna
Kovachevtsi
Kubrat
Panagyurishte
Petrich
Peshtera
Rakitovo
Sandanski
Svishtov
Sevlievo
Sofia-city - concession
Strelcha
Troyan
MAIN CONCLUSIONS ON THE STATUS OF THE WATER
SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE
The water resources are sufficient for normal water supply of the settlements in case
they are properly managed and effectively utilized.
The water supply networks are obsolete and depreciated with high level of water loses.
The number of settlements which are not supplies with water is too low.
Lack of enough number of regulatory annual and multi-annual equalizers
67% of the towns are provided with sewerage networks. Around 20% need reconstruction
and modernization.
There is a need of construction of a great number of sewerage networks and waste water
treatment plants.
The Commercial Water Supply and Sewerage Companies work not having in place the
National Strategy for the Development and Management of the Sector.
SWOT ANALYSIS
Opportunities
The provided services are of primary
importance to all consumers.
Activities in water supply and sewerage
belong to the “natural monopolies”
there are established management
structures and the related facilities.
Over 98,5% of the population uses water
from water supply systems.
The sector is considered a priority one and
it will receive significant funds from the
EU.
The country has available enough water
resources so that to meet the needs of the
population for drinking water.
In the sector work experienced and
competent professionals in the field of water
supply and sewerage.
There is a potential for the absorption of a
great amount of financial resources for
infrastructure improvement.
Financial interest is shown by international
financial institutions.
Some internationally recognized operators
have expressed interest to participate in services
management, and they are ready to make
significant investments for improvement of the
quality of water supply and sewerage services vis
concession or other forms of public-private
Development leverages
Strong sides
partnership.
SWOT ANALYSIS
Threats
depreciated water supply networks.
High level of water loses – over 60%.
Low level of collection of the owned
payments.
Low level of construction of the
sewerage networks.
Necessity of construction of a large
number of Waste Water Treatment Plants.
Necessity of significant investments.
Low level of income if the population.
High economic loses due to high level of
water loses.
Low potential of municipalities and the
state to invest in infrastructure.
Legislation developing slowly and in a
complex way.
Lack of training and re-training programs
designed for the professionals employed in
the sector.
Demographic problems related with the
reduction of consumption.
Restructuring of economy related with the
Obstacles to overcome
Weak sides
reduction of water consumption.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Option
Advantages
Disadvantages
Service contarct
а.It is applied to solve specific problems when: a good
management is already achieved; decrease of loses;
billing; management of Waste Water Treatment Plants ,
etc.
а.It can not solve the problems of the noneffective management
b.It can not improve the bad repayment of
expenditures
c.It is concluded for a short term
Management contract
а.They can quickly improve the technical capacity and
financial indicators
b.A good effectiveness is achieved for specific tasks
c.The responsibility for operation and maintenance is
transferred to the operator
а.Short term of effect
b.It does not ensure capital investments
Lease
а.Via it a good profit is achieved if the management is
improved
b.The operator is responsible for the effectiveness of
operation
c.Longer operational period
а. It does not ensure investments
b. For planning of capital costs
responsible remains the owner
Concession and
ВОТ*
а. The whole activity is transferred to the operator
b.Improved is the effectiveness of the management
c.Improved are the qualities of services
d.Long-run contracts - over 25 years
e.It Ensures investments for long-run development
f.The new facilities under construction and the
improved existing facilities remain for the owner of the
infrastructure
а. If the management during the contract
period if not good, then the risk is higher.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE MANAGEMENT
OPTIONS
Option
Joint companies
Privatization
Advantages
Disadvantages
а. Private sector participation is restricted
to the extent as identified in the contract .
b. If there is a good public-private
partnership, an increase of the
effectiveness and improvement of the
management could be achieved.
c. They are of long standing nature
d. Capital investments are ensured for
the development of infrastructure
а. A part of the responsibilities and risks
are retained by the owner
b. In some cases the owner and the
regulatory body are the same state body
which make the management more
complicated
а. All responsibilities are transferred to
the operator
b. Effectiveness and management are
improved
а. The sell of assets is carried out.
b. A very high extent of regulation is
required
c. Risk for the protection of public
interests
PROPOSAL FOR MANAGEMENT MODELS OF THE WATER SUPPLY
AND SEWERAGE WITH PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICPATION
Service contracts
Management contracts
Concession contracts and ВОТ
Establishment of joint management companies while
applying the said models
SOCIAL POLICY
 Characteristics of the employment in water sector
 Over 16 000 people are employed in the sector
 Stability of labour agreements
 Low level of outstanding payments to the employees
 Transparency of public finances and insurance system
SOCIAL POLICY
 Social factors that shall be taken into account during the process of
restructuring
 specific features of the regional labour market and the needs of the
related operators of the water supply and sewerage systems;
 the unemployment levels and defined by the related operator short-
term development perspectives;
 the possibilities of the related operators to implement adequate
programs for qualification and re-training of the available labour
force;
 the possibilities of the national employment programs and matching
the interests of the employed staff and of the investors in water
supply systems with the interests of their owners;
WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE REGULATION
 Economic regulation
 Commission on regulation of water services
• levels and standards of the services
Quality of drinking water
 Chemical-epidemic inspections within Ministry of Health
Quality of ground and underground water
Regional inspections for protection of environment and waters
INVESTMENT POLICY, PROGRAMMES AND PROJECTS
 Necessity of establishment of investment fund or state company for infrastructure
projects in water supply and sewerage
 Provision of capital investments via charges included in the price of the services and
dedicated to rehabilitation and completion of construction of the water supply and
sewerage networks
 Co-financing of international projects
Investment programs
 National program for construction of drinking water purification plants and water supply
projects
 Program for measures required in cases when a trend towards a dry season is observed
- prepared and adopted in 2001
 National program for priority construction of urban waste water treatment plants in
settlements with over 10.000 inhabitants
 National program for priority construction of urban waste water treatment plants in
settlements with over 2.000 inhabitants
INVESTMENT POLICY, PROGRAMMES AND PROJECTS
 National program for construction of sewerage systems in settlements with
over 10.000 inhabitants
 National program for construction of sewerage systems in settlements with
over 2.000 inhabitants
 Programs for management of water loses in water supply networks
 Projects for active control over the water loses
 Improvement of the operation and management of water supply and sewerage
networks
 Completion of water metering activities
 Reconstruction of water supply networks
INVESTMENTS NEEDED
№




Purpose of
Investments
Rehabilitatio
n of water
supply
networks
and
decrease of
water loses
Construction
of new and
completion of
already
started
facilities
Construction
of sewerage
networks
Construction
of
Waste
Water
Treatment
Plans – I
phase
Investments
needed
Responsib
le
institution
s
Implementation
terms
Possible
investment
sources
MRDPW
and
municipaliti
es
2002-2015
Concessions,
accession funds
(ISPA), National
budget
1 676
MRDPW
and
municipaliti
es
2002-2015
ВОТ, concessions,
National Budget
1 100
MOEW,
MRDPW
and
municipaliti
es
MOEW and
municipaliti
es
In compliance with
the National
Programme on
sewerage networks
ISPA, National
Budget
In compliance with
the National
Programme on
Waste Water
Treatment Plants
ISPA, National
Budget
/ million evro./
3 376
636
INDICATORS FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE ACTION PLAN
Development objective
1. Provision of conditions for
effective management of the
sector
2. Provision of conditions for
private sector participation
taking into account public
interests
Indicators for monitoring
Water loses
Water and Sewerage
Companies with water
loses >30%
Personnel in Water and
Sewerage Companies
servicing 1000 consumers
Decrease of water loses
Water and Sewerage
Companies with private
sector participation
Volume of investments
Water and Sewerage
3. Application of a structural
Companies
approach of management, taking
into account regional planning
and ensuring economies of scale
Population with central
4. Achievement of quality of
water supply
water and sewerage services that Population subjected to the
meets the requirements of the
regime of water supply
legislation
comparing the total number
of population
Population using drinking
water that does not meet
the requirements
Population with access to
sewerage networks
Population with access to
Urban Waste Water
Treatments Plants
Measurement
unit
million m3
number
number
million m3
number
thousand leva
number
%
%
%
%
%
Year of
2003
Year of
2015