Transcript NACE Update

Thank You IA LTAP!
Regions & State Affiliates
(New Affiliate in TN)
EDC LPA Initiative
• LPA Implementation Plan
• Stakeholder Partnering
•
Certification/Qualification Program for LPAs
•
Consultant Selection Strategies for Engineering Services
• September 24 EDC Exchange
Adoption and Implementation by
Counties
The vision of the National Strategy:
 A highway system free of fatalities.
 Envisions an accelerated decline in transportation-related
deaths and injuries.
 An intermediate goal of halving fatalities by
2030,
 Aggressively work toward a level of zero annual fatalities
and few injuries as the norm.
Implementation Elements
 Formal Commitment
 Establishment of Inter-Departmental
and/or Inter-Agency work group
 Review and consideration of all identified
strategies
 Commitment to data collection and
analysis
 Development of Local Safety Improvement
Plan
 Continuing Education
Commitment to data
collection and analysis
Why is Data Important?
 MAP-21 “Data Driven”
 Data Drives Funding
 Allows for better decision
making/resource allocation
 Saves more lives
System Requirements – Roads Coverage
 HSIP applies to all public roads
 Data to be collected from:
-
State owned/maintained roads
Non State owned/maintained roads
Roads on tribal lands
Public roads on Federal lands
10
MAP-21 Eligible Safety Data
Collection, Analysis, and
Improvement Activities
 Collection, analysis and improvement of safety data
is specifically identified as an eligible project within
the definition of a HSIP
11
Road Safety Data Sources –
Working Together with LTAPs
 Technical Assistance
Access to Data
 Data Analysis
 RSAs
 Training
 SHSP Representation
 TRCC
 Research Opportunities
 Peer Exchanges

What can Data Driven Safety Investments
Accomplish?
Source: Scott Davis, Thurston Co., WA
Development of Local
Safety Improvement Plan
Why Local Safety Improvement
Plans?
 MAP-21
 “Plans” Drive Funding
 Allows for better decision
making/resource allocation
 Saves more lives
SHSP Background
 Development led by the state DOT in
consultation with local, state, tribal,
federal and private-sector safety
stakeholders
Minnesota County Highway Safety
Plans – What has it accomplished?
In Minnesota:
 Toward Zero Deaths was adopted as a long term
vision in 2003.
 In 2009, MnDOT changed the distribution of
Highway Safety Improvement Program funds –
from virtually all on State highways to a
distribution proportional to the number of severe
crashes – basically 50% state and 50% local
systems.
Source: Howard Preston, PE, CH2M HILL
17
Implementation Elements
 Formal Commitment
 Establishment of Inter-Departmental
and/or Inter-Agency work group
 Review and consideration of all identified
strategies
 Commitment to data collection and
analysis
 Development of Local Safety Improvement
Plan
 Continuing Education